RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      ChatGPT의 유용성과 제한점에 대한 대학생의 인식에 관한 연구 = The Study on University Students' Perception of the Usefulness and Limitations of ChatGPT

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109235855

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was conducted with the aim of providing practical insights that can help in planning and designing more learner-tailored support when applying ChatGPT in university education by understanding university students' perceptions of the usefulness and limitations of ChatGPT. For this study, a survey was conducted targeting students enrolled in the S liberal arts course conducted as a cyber lecture at C University in the first semester of the 2023 academic year, and students enrolled in the K teacher training course at S University. Descriptive statistics, frequency analysis, reliability analysis, t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were conducted on the valid data from 610 respondents. The main findings are as follows. First, regarding the perception of ChatGPT, overall, the usefulness of ChatGPT was relatively positively perceived, while the limitations of ChatGPT were relatively concerning. Second, gender differences in perception showed that women had a more positive perception of the 'use of translation functions' and 'assignment analysis and feedback' within usefulness, whereas men had greater concerns about 'plagiarism and academic dishonesty' within limitations. Third, there were no significant differences in perception by grade level, but differences were found by major field in the 'use of translation functions' and 'basic data analysis and generation' within usefulness. Students from the humanities and social sciences and engineering fields perceived ChatGPT as more useful than those from the arts and physical education fields. Within limitations, students from the arts and physical education fields had greater concerns about 'learning gaps due to the ability to use ChatGPT' than those from the engineering fields. In conclusion, since most university students perceive the use of ChatGPT in learning as useful, it is necessary to encourage the active use of ChatGPT in classes and assignments. Additionally, to alleviate concerns about the limitations of ChatGPT, continuous education to prevent plagiarism and academic dishonesty should be conducted to raise awareness of plagiarism.
      번역하기

      This study was conducted with the aim of providing practical insights that can help in planning and designing more learner-tailored support when applying ChatGPT in university education by understanding university students' perceptions of the usefulne...

      This study was conducted with the aim of providing practical insights that can help in planning and designing more learner-tailored support when applying ChatGPT in university education by understanding university students' perceptions of the usefulness and limitations of ChatGPT. For this study, a survey was conducted targeting students enrolled in the S liberal arts course conducted as a cyber lecture at C University in the first semester of the 2023 academic year, and students enrolled in the K teacher training course at S University. Descriptive statistics, frequency analysis, reliability analysis, t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were conducted on the valid data from 610 respondents. The main findings are as follows. First, regarding the perception of ChatGPT, overall, the usefulness of ChatGPT was relatively positively perceived, while the limitations of ChatGPT were relatively concerning. Second, gender differences in perception showed that women had a more positive perception of the 'use of translation functions' and 'assignment analysis and feedback' within usefulness, whereas men had greater concerns about 'plagiarism and academic dishonesty' within limitations. Third, there were no significant differences in perception by grade level, but differences were found by major field in the 'use of translation functions' and 'basic data analysis and generation' within usefulness. Students from the humanities and social sciences and engineering fields perceived ChatGPT as more useful than those from the arts and physical education fields. Within limitations, students from the arts and physical education fields had greater concerns about 'learning gaps due to the ability to use ChatGPT' than those from the engineering fields. In conclusion, since most university students perceive the use of ChatGPT in learning as useful, it is necessary to encourage the active use of ChatGPT in classes and assignments. Additionally, to alleviate concerns about the limitations of ChatGPT, continuous education to prevent plagiarism and academic dishonesty should be conducted to raise awareness of plagiarism.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼