RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    청소년 문화복지지표체계 개발연구 = The Study of Adolescents Cultural Wellbeing Indicator - System Development

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30104977

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of but also this research was net only developing korean adolescent`s cultural wellbeing indicator-system than concretely validatingit. For this purpose, this study uses literature review, 2 rounds of delphi method process and statistical analysis. On delphi method process, participants were adolescents and relevant professionals(professors, institute researcher and field experts). The Number of participants was 90 in first round and 63 in second round. The results of this study were as follows. First, adolescents cultural wellbeing indicator-system has constructed 22 categories, 46 subcategories, 186 indicator items (147 objectives and 39 subjectives) in 5 parts. Second, the results of validate 「adolescents cultural wellbeing indicator-system」 were present congruence between three professional groups in mean by ANOVA, Also MDS results showed euclidean gaps between three groups. But it appeared consentaneously distribute near by ideal point. So can assumed there were congruence with validity of individual items in 「Adolescents cultural wellbeing indicator-system」
    번역하기

    The purpose of but also this research was net only developing korean adolescent`s cultural wellbeing indicator-system than concretely validatingit. For this purpose, this study uses literature review, 2 rounds of delphi method process and statistical ...

    The purpose of but also this research was net only developing korean adolescent`s cultural wellbeing indicator-system than concretely validatingit. For this purpose, this study uses literature review, 2 rounds of delphi method process and statistical analysis. On delphi method process, participants were adolescents and relevant professionals(professors, institute researcher and field experts). The Number of participants was 90 in first round and 63 in second round. The results of this study were as follows. First, adolescents cultural wellbeing indicator-system has constructed 22 categories, 46 subcategories, 186 indicator items (147 objectives and 39 subjectives) in 5 parts. Second, the results of validate 「adolescents cultural wellbeing indicator-system」 were present congruence between three professional groups in mean by ANOVA, Also MDS results showed euclidean gaps between three groups. But it appeared consentaneously distribute near by ideal point. So can assumed there were congruence with validity of individual items in 「Adolescents cultural wellbeing indicator-system」

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.51 2.51 2.56
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.84 2.89 3.162 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼