RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    아리스토텔레스에게 있어서 행복의 조건 = The Conditions of Happiness in Aristotle

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99894163

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Aristotle in the Nicomachean Ethics discusses the concept of human happiness. However, since he in Book 1, chs. 7-13 appears to regard the sum of all the activities as happiness, whereas he in Bk. 10, chs 6-8 seems to say that contemplation is a sufficient condition for happiness, there has been a controversy concerning which one of the two views really represents Aristotle. In what follows, I shall bring in the conception of “the comprehensibility of the soul” introduced by Aristotle in the De Anima and claim on the basis of it that his views called inclusive thesis and dominant thesis, respectively, are not incompatible, but can be interpreted as one and the same view. That is, he sometimes mentions a single soul and sometimes various souls, but since when he mentions a single soul, he has in mind a higher soul which subsumes or includes various lower souls, both cases can be understood as having indeed one and the same connotation. Through this discussion, we can conclude that the seemingly inconsistent theory of Aristotle`s conception of happiness is in effect consistent.
    번역하기

    Aristotle in the Nicomachean Ethics discusses the concept of human happiness. However, since he in Book 1, chs. 7-13 appears to regard the sum of all the activities as happiness, whereas he in Bk. 10, chs 6-8 seems to say that contemplation is a suffi...

    Aristotle in the Nicomachean Ethics discusses the concept of human happiness. However, since he in Book 1, chs. 7-13 appears to regard the sum of all the activities as happiness, whereas he in Bk. 10, chs 6-8 seems to say that contemplation is a sufficient condition for happiness, there has been a controversy concerning which one of the two views really represents Aristotle. In what follows, I shall bring in the conception of “the comprehensibility of the soul” introduced by Aristotle in the De Anima and claim on the basis of it that his views called inclusive thesis and dominant thesis, respectively, are not incompatible, but can be interpreted as one and the same view. That is, he sometimes mentions a single soul and sometimes various souls, but since when he mentions a single soul, he has in mind a higher soul which subsumes or includes various lower souls, both cases can be understood as having indeed one and the same connotation. Through this discussion, we can conclude that the seemingly inconsistent theory of Aristotle`s conception of happiness is in effect consistent.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼