“몸은 하나인데 많은 지체가 있고 몸의 지체가 많으나 한 몸임”을 적용한 현행 특허법상 특허권침해 판단에 관한 논의 = A Study on Determination of Patent Infringement under Korean Patent Act applying “The body is a unit, though it is made up of many parts; and though all its parts are many, they form one body”

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As this article examines the practically legal meaning of patented invention and patent claims in relation to patent infringement, and also All Elements Rule (AER) for determination of it.
‘A single patented invention is composed of several elements(or limitations of the element), and the patent right granted on the patent claims made up of each element has the effect of that right within a certain scope.’ However, all elements should be equally valued and read as they are in the accused product ('read on') without being distinguished as essential or secondary elements. If any element of the patented invention is missing, the accused product does not practice the patented invention. AER established on this basis was embodied in patented inventions as well as claimed inventions, and developed as legal solution for determining the infringement of patent rights.
Contrary to the fundamentals of AER, the value-difference/ the discrimination of elements is to intentionally distort AER or to misunderstand to apply the patented invention. In addition, in a patent infringement lawsuits they are inacceptable in their judgements, that is not to find the conclusion to ask the infringement but to show the inclusion of patent by trial to confirm scope of patent right. There can be no other opinion that this, too, is wrong.
It is once again confirmed that All Limitation Rule (ALR) or AER, the practical definition of patented invention and patent claims examined here are the core of establishing the legal principles of patent law. Until now, the legal research in this field has been lacking, so we are looking forward to more significant study on this subject-matter in the future.
*1 Corinthians 12:12

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박희섭, "특허법원론" 세창출판사 2009

2 사법연수원, "특허법연구" 2015

3 조영선, "특허법 3. 0" 박영사 2022

4 임석재, "특허법" 박영사 2018

5 배대헌, "특허권침해와 손해배상" 세창출판사 1997

6 김형두, "특허권침해 소송에서 특허권의 효력이 심리되고 있는 중에 그와 별개로 제기된 권리범위확인심판의 확인의 이익 여부" 박영사 42 : 2020

7 송영식, "지적소유권법(상)" 육법사 2005

8 배대헌, "지재법 분쟁해결의 최전선" 법문사 2022

9 권택수, "요건사실 특허법" 진원사 2010

10 최성준, "신특허법론" 신영사 2005

11 "수원지법 2019. 6. 14 선고 2018노1443 판결"

12 "수원지법 2018. 2. 8 선고 2017고정3057 판결"

13 "대법원 2023. 2. 2 선고 2022후10210 판결"

14 "대법원 2022. 9. 7 선고 2021다280835 판결"

15 "대법원 2022. 10. 14 선고 2022다223358 판결"

16 "대법원 2022. 1. 27 선고 2019다277751(본소) 판결"

17 "대법원 2021. 6. 30 선고 2021다217011 판결"

18 "대법원 2020. 7. 23 선고 2019도9547 판결"

19 "대법원 2019. 1. 31 선고 2018다267252 판결"

20 "대법원 2018. 2. 8 선고 2016후328 판결"

21 "대법원 2017. 9. 26 선고 2014다27425 판결"

22 "대법원 2015. 8. 27 선고 2014다7964 판결"

23 "대법원 2014. 7. 24 선고 2013다14361 판결"

24 "대법원 2013. 9. 12 선고 2012다36326 판결"

25 "대법원 2011. 9. 29 선고 2010다65818 판결"

26 "대법원 2011. 1. 27 선고 2009후832 판결"

27 "대법원 2010. 9. 30 자 2010마183 결정"

28 "대법원 2010. 12. 9 선고 2010후289 판결"

29 "대법원 2009. 10. 15 선고 2009다46712 판결"

30 "대법원 2005. 9. 30 선고 2004후3553 판결"

31 "대법원 2001. 9. 7 선고 99후1584 판결"

32 "대법원 2001. 12. 24 선고 99다31513 판결"

33 "대법원 2001. 10. 30 선고 99후710 판결"

34 "대법원 1997. 10. 24 선고 96후1798 판결"

35 Amy L. Landers, "Understanding Patent Law" LexisNexis 2008

36 Craig A. Nard, "The Law of Patents" Wolters Kluwer 2008

37 Donald S. Chisum, "Principles of Patent Law" Foundation Press 2001

38 Barry L. Grossman, "Patent Litigation Strategies Handbook" ABA/BNA 2000

39 Alan L. Durham, "Patent Law Essentials" Praeger 2018

40 Randall R. Rader, "Patent Law" West Academic Publishing 2018

41 Janice M, "Mueller, Patent Law" Aspen Publishing 2013

42 Jay Dratler, Jr., "Intellectual Property Law: Commercial, Creative, and Industrial Property (Vol.Ⅰ)" Law Journal Press 2006

43 Roger E. Schechter, "Intellectual Property" Thomas/West 2003

44 Annette Kur, "European Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases and Materials: Text, Cases and Materials" Edward Elgar 2019

45 Floyd H. Crews, "Dynamics of the Patent System" 1960

46 Paul Goldstein, "Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines" Foundation Press 2010

47 WIPO, "An International Guide to Patent Case Management for Judges"