RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Regulating Export Taxes in Multilateral Negotiations: Nature and Options = Regulating Export Taxes in Multilateral Negotiations: Nature and Options

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75040446

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The proliferation of export taxes and other export restrictions in the middle of the so-called agflation is casting a cloud over food security especially in developing countries. Nevertheless, common arguments or rationale for the trade measure prevailed include safeguarding economic development, terms of trade, the balance of payment, the environment, security and others. This paper surveyed trade dispute cases under the GATT and examined the GATT rules and bilateral trade agreements concerning export taxes. It also pointed out the irony that the WTO is reining in export taxes of newly acceding countries while it shows strong resistance to make commitments at the DDA negotiations. Finally, the paper suggests three regulatory options to moderate export taxes. First, it is to make member countries reaffirm and thus comply with the existing GATT provisions of transparency. The second option is to forge a separated agreement on export taxes. The third alternative is to establish a new system that specifies commitments regarding introduction, notification, reduction, reviews and dispute settlements.1)
    번역하기

    The proliferation of export taxes and other export restrictions in the middle of the so-called agflation is casting a cloud over food security especially in developing countries. Nevertheless, common arguments or rationale for the trade measure prevai...

    The proliferation of export taxes and other export restrictions in the middle of the so-called agflation is casting a cloud over food security especially in developing countries. Nevertheless, common arguments or rationale for the trade measure prevailed include safeguarding economic development, terms of trade, the balance of payment, the environment, security and others. This paper surveyed trade dispute cases under the GATT and examined the GATT rules and bilateral trade agreements concerning export taxes. It also pointed out the irony that the WTO is reining in export taxes of newly acceding countries while it shows strong resistance to make commitments at the DDA negotiations. Finally, the paper suggests three regulatory options to moderate export taxes. First, it is to make member countries reaffirm and thus comply with the existing GATT provisions of transparency. The second option is to forge a separated agreement on export taxes. The third alternative is to establish a new system that specifies commitments regarding introduction, notification, reduction, reviews and dispute settlements.1)

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼