RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      헤겔의 반낭만주의적 낭만주의 ; 그의 체계에서 “낭만적인 것”의 변증법 = Hegel`s anti-romantic romanticism: The dialectics of “the romantic” in his system

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99667061

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this research is to provide a deeper and more appropriate interpretation of the Hegelian concept of ‘the romantic.’ The author focuses especially on Hegel`s new change of view, which might be called ‘the second turn’: Although he is familiar with romanticism in his youth period, the mature Hegel turns to anti-romanticism (the first turn), because he took the absoluteness of reason; But in the process of development of his system to the completion, he subsumes both romantic and anti-romantic standpoints under ‘the romantic’ as a macroscopic category and uses this concept in a wider and more profound sense. His concept of ‘the romantic’ can be used almost synonymously with ‘the christian.’ However, ‘the christian’ includes the christianity as a certain religion on the one hand, but may not be simply equalized with it on the other, just as ‘the romantic’ is a superordinate concept of romanticism and thus could not be identified with it, because these two concepts basically indicate the way of mental operation called ‘internalness’ (Innerlichkeit). Therefore we could say that the highest and ultimate fulfillment of the Hegelian romantic (and the Hegelian christian) could be found exclusively in the stage of (speculative) philosophy, but neither in the romanticism nor in the christianity, and in this sense he could be called an ‘anti-romantic romanticist.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this research is to provide a deeper and more appropriate interpretation of the Hegelian concept of ‘the romantic.’ The author focuses especially on Hegel`s new change of view, which might be called ‘the second turn’: Although h...

      The purpose of this research is to provide a deeper and more appropriate interpretation of the Hegelian concept of ‘the romantic.’ The author focuses especially on Hegel`s new change of view, which might be called ‘the second turn’: Although he is familiar with romanticism in his youth period, the mature Hegel turns to anti-romanticism (the first turn), because he took the absoluteness of reason; But in the process of development of his system to the completion, he subsumes both romantic and anti-romantic standpoints under ‘the romantic’ as a macroscopic category and uses this concept in a wider and more profound sense. His concept of ‘the romantic’ can be used almost synonymously with ‘the christian.’ However, ‘the christian’ includes the christianity as a certain religion on the one hand, but may not be simply equalized with it on the other, just as ‘the romantic’ is a superordinate concept of romanticism and thus could not be identified with it, because these two concepts basically indicate the way of mental operation called ‘internalness’ (Innerlichkeit). Therefore we could say that the highest and ultimate fulfillment of the Hegelian romantic (and the Hegelian christian) could be found exclusively in the stage of (speculative) philosophy, but neither in the romanticism nor in the christianity, and in this sense he could be called an ‘anti-romantic romanticist.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최신한, "헤겔의 종교 담론과 계몽의 계몽" 새한철학회 63 (63): 431-449, 2011

      2 권대중, "헤겔의 반낭만주의에 함축된 철학적 층위들" 한국헤겔학회 (31) : 155-176, 2012

      3 권대중, "헤겔의 미학, In 미학의 역사" 서울대출판부 2007

      4 권대중, "헤겔의 ‘예술의 종언’ 명제가 지니는 다양한 논의 지평들" 33 : 2002

      5 헤겔, "종교철학" 지식산업사 1999

      6 이창환, "예술의 “철학”으로서의 헤겔 미학" 17 : 1992

      7 G. W. F. Hegel, "Werke in zwanzig Bänden" Frankfurt a. M 1971

      8 H. G. Hotho, "Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik"

      9 Ph. Marheineke, "Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion"

      10 "Phänomenologie des Geistes"

      1 최신한, "헤겔의 종교 담론과 계몽의 계몽" 새한철학회 63 (63): 431-449, 2011

      2 권대중, "헤겔의 반낭만주의에 함축된 철학적 층위들" 한국헤겔학회 (31) : 155-176, 2012

      3 권대중, "헤겔의 미학, In 미학의 역사" 서울대출판부 2007

      4 권대중, "헤겔의 ‘예술의 종언’ 명제가 지니는 다양한 논의 지평들" 33 : 2002

      5 헤겔, "종교철학" 지식산업사 1999

      6 이창환, "예술의 “철학”으로서의 헤겔 미학" 17 : 1992

      7 G. W. F. Hegel, "Werke in zwanzig Bänden" Frankfurt a. M 1971

      8 H. G. Hotho, "Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik"

      9 Ph. Marheineke, "Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion"

      10 "Phänomenologie des Geistes"

      11 V. Hösle, "Hegels System, In Philosophie der Natur und des Geistes" 1988

      12 O. Pöggeler, "Hegel in Berlin: preußische Kulturpolitik und idealistische Ästhetik, In Todestag des Philosophen" 1981

      13 "Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grudrisse"

      14 "Frühe Schriften"

      15 G. W. F. Hegel, "Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaft im Grudrisse (1817)" 1927

      16 "Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaft im Grudrisse"

      17 W. Jaeschke, "Die Religionsphilosophie Hegels" 1983

      18 A. Hofstadter, "Die Kunst: Tod und Verklärung. Überlegungen zu Hegels Lehre von der Romantik, In Hegel-Studien Beiheft" 1974

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.21 0.21 0.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.26 0.736 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼