RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    무고죄에서 징계처분의 해석에 대한 비판적 고찰 = A Critical Review of the Interpretation of Disciplinary Actions in the Case of False Accusation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110046159

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Indiscriminate accusations and reports are rampant, and the resulting false accusations are also increasing. False accusation is a serious crime that involves using the judicial system to falsely accuse another person of criminal or disciplinary action. However, due to low awareness of the crime, there are many cases where it is used as a means to harass others.
    The majority opinion and precedents hold that the primary legal interest in the crime of false accusation is the state's legal interest in exercising its judicial power and disciplinary power properly, while the individual's legal interest in not being unfairly punished or dispositioned is considered a secondary legal interest. Accordingly, the act of false accusation for the purpose of receiving disciplinary action is recognized as a disciplinary action under Article 156 of the Criminal Act only when the sanction is imposed due to a special power relationship or supervisory relationship under public law. Disciplinary action that has the nature of a judicial legal act is not considered a subject of false accusation.
    Unlike criminal punishment, disciplinary action is characterized by a greater degree of infringement on the personal legal interests of the accused than on the national legal interests. The personal legal interests that are violated by disciplinary action cannot be overlooked. However, it is being applied with a focus on the interpretation that it is a crime that infringes on national interests by linking it with criminal punishment. As a result, those who are not in a special power relationship under public law are not protected by Article 156 of the Criminal Act even if they are subject to disciplinary action for making a false report.
    Therefore, it is necessary to delete the ‘public office or public official’ specified as the subject of reporting in Article 156 of the Criminal Act on false accusation and to expand the scope of interpretation of disciplinary action. All public disciplinary actions based on the law should be regarded as disciplinary actions for false accusations, and it is necessary to protect those who have been unfairly subjected to disciplinary action or are at risk of such action, without distinction of special power relationships under public law or legal relationships under private law.
    번역하기

    Indiscriminate accusations and reports are rampant, and the resulting false accusations are also increasing. False accusation is a serious crime that involves using the judicial system to falsely accuse another person of criminal or disciplinary actio...

    Indiscriminate accusations and reports are rampant, and the resulting false accusations are also increasing. False accusation is a serious crime that involves using the judicial system to falsely accuse another person of criminal or disciplinary action. However, due to low awareness of the crime, there are many cases where it is used as a means to harass others.
    The majority opinion and precedents hold that the primary legal interest in the crime of false accusation is the state's legal interest in exercising its judicial power and disciplinary power properly, while the individual's legal interest in not being unfairly punished or dispositioned is considered a secondary legal interest. Accordingly, the act of false accusation for the purpose of receiving disciplinary action is recognized as a disciplinary action under Article 156 of the Criminal Act only when the sanction is imposed due to a special power relationship or supervisory relationship under public law. Disciplinary action that has the nature of a judicial legal act is not considered a subject of false accusation.
    Unlike criminal punishment, disciplinary action is characterized by a greater degree of infringement on the personal legal interests of the accused than on the national legal interests. The personal legal interests that are violated by disciplinary action cannot be overlooked. However, it is being applied with a focus on the interpretation that it is a crime that infringes on national interests by linking it with criminal punishment. As a result, those who are not in a special power relationship under public law are not protected by Article 156 of the Criminal Act even if they are subject to disciplinary action for making a false report.
    Therefore, it is necessary to delete the ‘public office or public official’ specified as the subject of reporting in Article 156 of the Criminal Act on false accusation and to expand the scope of interpretation of disciplinary action. All public disciplinary actions based on the law should be regarded as disciplinary actions for false accusations, and it is necessary to protect those who have been unfairly subjected to disciplinary action or are at risk of such action, without distinction of special power relationships under public law or legal relationships under private law.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼