RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Essays in Law and Economics.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14491134

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      [S.l.]: Princeton University 2015

    • 학위수여대학

      Princeton University Economics

    • 수여연도

      2015

    • 작성언어

      영어

    • 주제어
    • 학위

      Ph.D.

    • 페이지수

      179 p.

    • 지도교수/심사위원

      Advisers: Orley C. Ashenfelter; Henry S. Farber.

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This collection of essays applies empirical techniques from economics to questions in law, with a focus on innovation and litigation. A common theme among these articles is that empirical analysis can be used to measure and predict how legal actors respond to economic incentives.
    Chapter 1 explores an understudied question in patents: what is the relative importance of patent term (i.e., duration of patent protection) across different industries? This article (co-authored with fellow Princeton Ph.D. candidate, Judd Cramer) measures term sensitivity through patent applicants' response to the passage of the TRIPS agreement, which changed how term was calculated. We find significant differences in term sensitivity across industries, some of which follows conventional wisdom (patent term is important in pharmaceuticals) and some of which does not (it also matters for software). Our measure is highly correlated with patent renewal rates across industries. This corroborates an intuitive prediction that we formalize in a model: industries that place a greater value on patent term tend to have higher expected profits toward the end of term.
    Chapter 2 applies these empirical results in a policy context. This law review piece explains how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office could increase its revenues and promote innovation by charging different patent "prices" for inventions in different industries. Such pricing could also be used to tailor effective patent term across industries, an emergent goal for many legal scholars.
    Chapter 3 turns to diversity jurisdiction cases, a prominent form of federal litigation. I develop a general model of forum shopping and empirically corroborate one of its testable predictions: parties (particularly corporations) who litigate outside of their home state settle cases more often than parties who litigate at home. My results are robust under a variety of specifications, including ones with fixed effects for plaintiff home state, years of suit filing and termination, forum, and case type.
    번역하기

    This collection of essays applies empirical techniques from economics to questions in law, with a focus on innovation and litigation. A common theme among these articles is that empirical analysis can be used to measure and predict how legal actors r...

    This collection of essays applies empirical techniques from economics to questions in law, with a focus on innovation and litigation. A common theme among these articles is that empirical analysis can be used to measure and predict how legal actors respond to economic incentives.
    Chapter 1 explores an understudied question in patents: what is the relative importance of patent term (i.e., duration of patent protection) across different industries? This article (co-authored with fellow Princeton Ph.D. candidate, Judd Cramer) measures term sensitivity through patent applicants' response to the passage of the TRIPS agreement, which changed how term was calculated. We find significant differences in term sensitivity across industries, some of which follows conventional wisdom (patent term is important in pharmaceuticals) and some of which does not (it also matters for software). Our measure is highly correlated with patent renewal rates across industries. This corroborates an intuitive prediction that we formalize in a model: industries that place a greater value on patent term tend to have higher expected profits toward the end of term.
    Chapter 2 applies these empirical results in a policy context. This law review piece explains how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office could increase its revenues and promote innovation by charging different patent "prices" for inventions in different industries. Such pricing could also be used to tailor effective patent term across industries, an emergent goal for many legal scholars.
    Chapter 3 turns to diversity jurisdiction cases, a prominent form of federal litigation. I develop a general model of forum shopping and empirically corroborate one of its testable predictions: parties (particularly corporations) who litigate outside of their home state settle cases more often than parties who litigate at home. My results are robust under a variety of specifications, including ones with fixed effects for plaintiff home state, years of suit filing and termination, forum, and case type.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼