RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국가회계 우발부채 회계처리에 대한 비판적 검토: 반복지출 우발부채 사례를 중심으로 = Critical Review of the National Accounting Standard on Contingent Liability: A Case of Recurrent Expenditure

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104893542

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study investigates the case of recurrent contingent liabilities and suggests the policy implication for practical use of the financial statements of Korea which have been published based on accrual accounting from 2011. The amount of recurrent contingent liabilities is more than 1 trillion won each year, which is comparable to the one-year net operating costs of several ministries of the central government. However, the government does not account for provisions regarding these expenditures for the reason that it is difficult to estimate future costs reasonably. In this study, we critically investigate and compare IFRS, IPSAS, and the national accounting standards in relation to recurrent contingent liabilities. Since most of the recurrent contingent liabilities are based on laws, agreements and policies, outflow of resources or potential services will be required and the amount of the obligation can be measured with sufficient reliability. We argue that, considering the inherent characteristics of the government sector, the fiscal environment, and policy objectives in Korea, it is meaningful to account recurrent contingent liabilities as provisions in financial statements. Ultimately, it is expected to strengthen the public accountability of the government and to enhance the policy utilization of the accrual based national accounting information.
      번역하기

      This study investigates the case of recurrent contingent liabilities and suggests the policy implication for practical use of the financial statements of Korea which have been published based on accrual accounting from 2011. The amount of recurrent co...

      This study investigates the case of recurrent contingent liabilities and suggests the policy implication for practical use of the financial statements of Korea which have been published based on accrual accounting from 2011. The amount of recurrent contingent liabilities is more than 1 trillion won each year, which is comparable to the one-year net operating costs of several ministries of the central government. However, the government does not account for provisions regarding these expenditures for the reason that it is difficult to estimate future costs reasonably. In this study, we critically investigate and compare IFRS, IPSAS, and the national accounting standards in relation to recurrent contingent liabilities. Since most of the recurrent contingent liabilities are based on laws, agreements and policies, outflow of resources or potential services will be required and the amount of the obligation can be measured with sufficient reliability. We argue that, considering the inherent characteristics of the government sector, the fiscal environment, and policy objectives in Korea, it is meaningful to account recurrent contingent liabilities as provisions in financial statements. Ultimately, it is expected to strengthen the public accountability of the government and to enhance the policy utilization of the accrual based national accounting information.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 금재덕, "지방재정공시제도의 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원 5 (5): 29-48, 2010

      2 최연식, "정보이용자 관점에서의 국가 재무보고 사례 분석 - 한국과 미국의 국가결산보고서 비교분석을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 24 (24): 347-390, 2015

      3 정성호, "우발부채의 체계적 관리를 위한 제언: GFS 2014에 근거한 용어 재정립, 분류 및 보고체계를 중심으로" 한국지방재정학회 20 (20): 59-87, 2015

      4 박성동, "우리나라 국가회계기준의 개정방향에 관한 연구- 미국 국가회계규정 및 국제공공회계기준과의 비교분석을 중심으로 -" 한국회계학회 21 (21): 31-58, 2012

      5 고윤성, "연금회계준칙 제정에 따른 국가회계의 개선방안 연구" 한국회계학회 21 (21): 1-33, 2012

      6 박재환, "미국, 영국 및 뉴질랜드 중앙정부 감사보고서 사례 연구" 한국회계학회 21 (21): 257-292, 2012

      7 허웅, "국가별 정부회계제도 차이에 대한 연구" 피터드러커 소사이어티 4 (4): 143-181, 2011

      8 최연식, "공공부문 재무보고를 위한 개념체계 해외사례 분석: 미국과 캐나다의 공공부문 개념체계 비교·분석을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 25 (25): 221-259, 2016

      9 Kim, K. S., "Valuation of the Minimum Revenue Guarantee in the Urban Railway PPP Project" 2013

      10 Currie, E., "The potential role of government debt management offices in monitoring and managing contingent liabilities" World Bank 2002

      1 금재덕, "지방재정공시제도의 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원 5 (5): 29-48, 2010

      2 최연식, "정보이용자 관점에서의 국가 재무보고 사례 분석 - 한국과 미국의 국가결산보고서 비교분석을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 24 (24): 347-390, 2015

      3 정성호, "우발부채의 체계적 관리를 위한 제언: GFS 2014에 근거한 용어 재정립, 분류 및 보고체계를 중심으로" 한국지방재정학회 20 (20): 59-87, 2015

      4 박성동, "우리나라 국가회계기준의 개정방향에 관한 연구- 미국 국가회계규정 및 국제공공회계기준과의 비교분석을 중심으로 -" 한국회계학회 21 (21): 31-58, 2012

      5 고윤성, "연금회계준칙 제정에 따른 국가회계의 개선방안 연구" 한국회계학회 21 (21): 1-33, 2012

      6 박재환, "미국, 영국 및 뉴질랜드 중앙정부 감사보고서 사례 연구" 한국회계학회 21 (21): 257-292, 2012

      7 허웅, "국가별 정부회계제도 차이에 대한 연구" 피터드러커 소사이어티 4 (4): 143-181, 2011

      8 최연식, "공공부문 재무보고를 위한 개념체계 해외사례 분석: 미국과 캐나다의 공공부문 개념체계 비교·분석을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 25 (25): 221-259, 2016

      9 Kim, K. S., "Valuation of the Minimum Revenue Guarantee in the Urban Railway PPP Project" 2013

      10 Currie, E., "The potential role of government debt management offices in monitoring and managing contingent liabilities" World Bank 2002

      11 Kim, S. H., "The Status and Future Task of Local Government Cost Accounting System" 8 (8): 61-88, 2010

      12 Jeoung, M. S., "The Performance of Accrual Basis Accounting System : The Case of Bucheon Municipal Government" 7 (7): 75-96, 2009

      13 You, K. Y., "The Course of Development in Governmental Budget System based on Accrual According : In Emphasis in the Defense Financial According" 5 (5): 97-122, 2007

      14 Choi, J. H., "The Characteristics of Basic Concepts in Governmental Accounting Terminology" 2 (2): 81-96, 2004

      15 Government of the Republic of Korea, "Report on National Account" 2013

      16 Government of the Republic of Korea, "Report on National Account" 2012

      17 Government of the Republic of Korea, "Report on National Account" 2015

      18 Government of the Republic of Korea, "Report on National Account" 2014

      19 Government of the Republic of Korea, "Report on National Account" 2011

      20 Financial Accounting Standards, "Provisions, Contingent Liabilities, Contingent Asset"

      21 Shim, J. Y., "Performance and Tasks of Local Government Accounting Training" 4 (4): 31-52, 2006

      22 Ministry of Strategy and Finance, "National Accounting Manual"

      23 Paik, T. Y., "Local Governments Cost Accounting Standards and Methods" 8 (8): 31-51, 2010

      24 Kim, K. H., "Improving the Indicator for Analysing Local Public Finance in Accrual Accounting System" 9 (9): 1-37, 2011

      25 Kwon, B. C., "Improvement of the Public Accounting System by the Government Accounting Act - Focusing on the National Pension System -" 6 (6): 55-77, 2008

      26 KDI PIMAC, "Improvement of financial support standards and procedures for private investment projects"

      27 Lee, N. K., "Governmental Accounting Reform in UK: Focusing on Transition Process to the Accrual Accounting System" 1 (1): 77-102, 2003

      28 "Enforcement Decree of the Private Investment Act for Social Infrastructure"

      29 Jeong, S. H., "Discourse for sound Korean finance" Pakyoungsa 2015

      30 Kim, K. H., "Directions for Setting National Pension Fund Accounting Standards" 7 (7): 3-27, 2009

      31 Das, T., "Contingent Liability Management - A Study on India"

      32 KDI PIMAC, "BTL Standard Conduct Agreement Commentary Research"

      33 KDI PIMAC, "BTL Business facilities Management Guideline Research"

      34 Kim, K. D., "An Analysis of the Attitude on the Performance of the Double-entry and Accrual Basis Accounting System in Korean Local Governments" 11 (11): 61-84, 2013

      35 Lee, K. S., "Alice in wonderland - how to use government accrual accounting information -" 8 (8): 115-152, 2010

      36 Kim, K. H., "Accrual basis is now more prevalent in government accounting" 2 : 2015

      37 Bae, K. S., "A Study on the Relation of Government's Risk Management and Accounting" 10 (10): 61-79, 2012

      38 KDI PIMAC, "A Study on the Investment Status and Regulation Improvement of Fund Investment in Private Investment Projects"

      39 Lee, J. H., "A Study on the Financial Accounting Information System of Chungbuk Government" 9 (9): 39-52, 2011

      40 Kim, H., "A Study on the Development of Local Government's Performance Disclosure" 3 (3): 1-26, 2005

      41 Choi, S. K., "A Study on Public Sector Pension Accounting in Government Financial Reporting" 5 (5): 85-113, 2007

      42 Yoon, J. W., "A Study on Conceptual Framework of Government Financial Reporting" 3 (3): 51-76, 2005

      43 Hwang, K. J., "A Road Map to Effective Implementation of Local Governments' Financial Statements Audit" 6 (6): 3-36, 2008

      44 Shin, J. R., "A Desirable Way of Government Accounting Education" 3 (3): 163-184, 2005

      45 Lim, S. S., "A Comment on Critical Issues for Reforming Government Accounting" 2 (2): 89-113, 2004

      46 "2016 KDI PIMAC Annual Report" 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.99 0.99 1.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.35 1.43 2.629 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼