롱기누스 숭고론의 시학적 전유 = Poetics of The Sublime and Longinus

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This writing has its purpose in groping for the sublime concept's poetic application by critically reviewing the sublime discussion that has risen as a modern aesthetic theory from a poetic point of view.
Over a long period of time, the ancient Greeks eliminated the irrational factors of their political system and culture. They removed holiness and sentiments such as astrology, oracles, pathos and lunacy and replaced with a logos-centered rationalism. <On the Sublime> by Longinus is supposed to have been written to regain the human mind's freedom that had been repressed by such ancient rationalism. In order to achieve this, Longinus presented the origin of sublime by using sublime discourse as sublime subject and pursued the restoration of great poets represented by Homer through education. This is an important characteristic that distinguishes his theory of sublime from other ancient poetry and provided the foundation that made possible for modern aesthetics to dualize the human aesthetic judgment with beauty and sublime.
Firstly, it shows big difference from the modern sublime in the sense that it used the sublime discourse as sublime subject and for this reason, his sublime theory is very easy to exclusively possess poetry. Especially, Longinus' sublime concept includes the meaning of 'big' and 'high' and this can be interpreted as a result reflecting the ancient Greeks' mythical thinking of deciding God's power and rank with high and low. Moreover, sublime can be understood as uplift in emotion derived from the desire to overcome the limits of humans and become a bigger and higher God-like being. The pathos produced in this process especially can be a probable cause for sublime poetry in the sense that it has the same effects as the poetic language's significance being put into action that violates the existing language systems or symbolic systems.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김용희, "해방이라는 숭고한 대상과 언어적 공황" 국어국문학회 141 : 367-389, 2005

2 리오타르, J.-F., "포스트모던의 조건" 민음사 1992

3 칸트, I., "판단력 비판" 박영사 2005

4 박현수, "일제 강점기 시의 숭고 고찰 in: 현대시와 전통주의 수사학" 서울대출판부 2004

5 김점용, "이육사 시의 숭고미" 한국시학회 (17) : 31-51, 2006

6 플라톤, "이온 in: 플라톤전집 제6권" 상서각 1973

7 아리스토텔레스, "시학" 문예출판사 2002

8 크리스테바, J., "시적 언어의 혁명" 동문선 2000

9 낭시, J.-L., "숭고한 봉헌 in: 숭고에 대하여" 문학과지성사 2005

10 안성찬, "숭고의 미학" 유로서적 2004

11 버크, E., "숭고와 아름다움의 이념의 기원에 대한 철학적 탐구" 마티 2006

12 김동우, "숭고와 계몽의 역설 - 한용운 시의 현재성" 한국시학회 (24) : 67-93, 2009

13 아리스토텔레스, "숭고에 관하여 in: 시학" 문예출판사 2002

14 박민규, "백석 시의 숭고(崇高)와 그 의미" 한국시학회 (23) : 193-218, 2008

15 타타르키비츠, W., "미학의 기본 개념사" 미술문화 1999

16 플라톤, "메논 in: 플라톤전집 제3권" 상서각 1973

17 김상봉, "롱기누스와 숭고의 개념" 한국서양고전학회 9 (9): 1995

18 장파, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" 푸른숲 1999

19 오인용, "낭만주의 비평의 이념적 지형: 숭고 담론의 정치학" 한국비평이론학회 10 (10): 5-28, 2005

20 도즈, E. R., "그리스인들과 비이성적인 것" 까치 2002

21 베르낭, J.-P., "그리스 사유의 기원" 길 2006

22 플라톤, "국가" 삼성출판사 1990

23 메종뇌브, J., "감정" 한길사 1999

24 Bradley, A. C., "Oxford Lectures On Poetry" Atlantic 2009

25 Müller, A., "'Erhaben, das Erhabene in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie" Schwabe & Co. 1972