RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    財務成果測定値의 發展過程에 관한 小考 = Historical Review of the Corporate Financial Performance Measures

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3007373

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the early 1920's, appearance of big companies like GM and DuPont asked for the development of efficient management tools and measures of corporate performance. Since then, measures used by management include Net Income, EPS, Cash Flows, ROI, RI, Market Value, Economic Income and EVA. These performance measures have been used variously in different times and in different industries. This paper tries to provide historical perspectives on the development of such measures. Especially the demand for, development processes, and traits of those measures used heavily y current management will be explained.
    The development of corporate performance measures over the past century has its genesis in the works of statisticians, economists and managers who sought to understand the functions of the statisticians, economists and managers who sought to understand the functions of the American corporation, and-through this understanding-to improve its operation. Early attempts by academics to compare economic performance across firms using empirical data as well as significant developments in economic theory that are relevant to the performance assessment of firms are reviewed.
    We argue that, even though several of the key concepts of corporate performance measures have their origins in the 1920's, much of today's debate about evaluation of corporate performance has to do with their ability to generate relevant accounting numbers when employed in the theoretically correct economic models.
    Net Income, EPS, ROI, RI and EVA are measure frequently used by both academics and practitioners. Especially, ROI and EVA are preferred and are expected to be favorites in the future.
    번역하기

    In the early 1920's, appearance of big companies like GM and DuPont asked for the development of efficient management tools and measures of corporate performance. Since then, measures used by management include Net Income, EPS, Cash Flows, ROI, RI, M...

    In the early 1920's, appearance of big companies like GM and DuPont asked for the development of efficient management tools and measures of corporate performance. Since then, measures used by management include Net Income, EPS, Cash Flows, ROI, RI, Market Value, Economic Income and EVA. These performance measures have been used variously in different times and in different industries. This paper tries to provide historical perspectives on the development of such measures. Especially the demand for, development processes, and traits of those measures used heavily y current management will be explained.
    The development of corporate performance measures over the past century has its genesis in the works of statisticians, economists and managers who sought to understand the functions of the statisticians, economists and managers who sought to understand the functions of the American corporation, and-through this understanding-to improve its operation. Early attempts by academics to compare economic performance across firms using empirical data as well as significant developments in economic theory that are relevant to the performance assessment of firms are reviewed.
    We argue that, even though several of the key concepts of corporate performance measures have their origins in the 1920's, much of today's debate about evaluation of corporate performance has to do with their ability to generate relevant accounting numbers when employed in the theoretically correct economic models.
    Net Income, EPS, ROI, RI and EVA are measure frequently used by both academics and practitioners. Especially, ROI and EVA are preferred and are expected to be favorites in the future.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.序 論
    • Ⅱ.企業成果測 評價의 必要性 擡頭
    • Ⅲ.成果評價 基礎로서의 價値理論
    • Ⅳ.主要 企業成果 測定値 및 導入背景
    • Ⅳ.結論
    • Ⅰ.序 論
    • Ⅱ.企業成果測 評價의 必要性 擡頭
    • Ⅲ.成果評價 基礎로서의 價値理論
    • Ⅳ.主要 企業成果 測定値 및 導入背景
    • Ⅳ.結論
    • 참고문헌
    • SUMMARY
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼