RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      2009 개정 교육과정과 고등학교 국사 교육 = 2009 National Curriculum Amendment and Korean History Education in High School

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82623857

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      2007 revised National Curriculum by Ministry of Education, Science and Technology was revised again in 2009, the itemized details for ‘History’ subject was amended in 2010. From 2011, newly revised curriculum for history turned out to have undesirable affects on history education. They are summarized as below.
      First, formerly separate subjects known as ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’ are unified as ‘Korean History’. But in the process of the integration, ‘Korean Contemporary History’ has sharply cut down and ‘Economic History’, ‘Social Science’ and ‘Cultural History’ have particularly not been dealt at all.
      Second, ‘Korean History’ has been decided to be taught 5 times a week, which means less history education than before. The 7th National Curriculum demanded to complete 200 hours of ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’, but 2009 revised National Curriculum notifies 85 hours of course completion for ‘Korean History’.
      Third, with introduction of intensive course completion, ‘Korean History’ course is completed within a semester, therefore resulting in growing number of students who give up to complete the course.
      The government is taking on the plan to make ‘Korean history’ as a required subject. However, for ‘Korean History’ to be taught successfully in high schools, making the subject as compulsory is not the critical issue. To genuinely reinforce Korean history education, it would be more crucial to make all the test applicants for National Academic Aptitude Test take ‘Korean History’ test.
      번역하기

      2007 revised National Curriculum by Ministry of Education, Science and Technology was revised again in 2009, the itemized details for ‘History’ subject was amended in 2010. From 2011, newly revised curriculum for history turned out to have undesir...

      2007 revised National Curriculum by Ministry of Education, Science and Technology was revised again in 2009, the itemized details for ‘History’ subject was amended in 2010. From 2011, newly revised curriculum for history turned out to have undesirable affects on history education. They are summarized as below.
      First, formerly separate subjects known as ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’ are unified as ‘Korean History’. But in the process of the integration, ‘Korean Contemporary History’ has sharply cut down and ‘Economic History’, ‘Social Science’ and ‘Cultural History’ have particularly not been dealt at all.
      Second, ‘Korean History’ has been decided to be taught 5 times a week, which means less history education than before. The 7th National Curriculum demanded to complete 200 hours of ‘National History’ and ‘Korean Contemporary History’, but 2009 revised National Curriculum notifies 85 hours of course completion for ‘Korean History’.
      Third, with introduction of intensive course completion, ‘Korean History’ course is completed within a semester, therefore resulting in growing number of students who give up to complete the course.
      The government is taking on the plan to make ‘Korean history’ as a required subject. However, for ‘Korean History’ to be taught successfully in high schools, making the subject as compulsory is not the critical issue. To genuinely reinforce Korean history education, it would be more crucial to make all the test applicants for National Academic Aptitude Test take ‘Korean History’ test.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서언
      • 2. 교육과정 변화와 〈국사〉 과목
      • 3. 집중이수제의 문제점
      • 4. 대학수학능력시험에서 〈국사〉 과목의 변천과 영향
      • 5. 제언
      • 1. 서언
      • 2. 교육과정 변화와 〈국사〉 과목
      • 3. 집중이수제의 문제점
      • 4. 대학수학능력시험에서 〈국사〉 과목의 변천과 영향
      • 5. 제언
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 0.94
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.94 0.96 1.598 0.59
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼