미국에서 적극적조치(Affirmative Action)를 둘러싸고 전개되었던 논쟁을 제도의 필요성, 효과성, 정당성, 역기능의 네 가지 논점을 중심으로 살펴본다. 제도의 효과성에 대한 비판에 대해서는 단...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76136646
2006
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
167-208(42쪽)
22
0
상세조회0
다운로드미국에서 적극적조치(Affirmative Action)를 둘러싸고 전개되었던 논쟁을 제도의 필요성, 효과성, 정당성, 역기능의 네 가지 논점을 중심으로 살펴본다. 제도의 효과성에 대한 비판에 대해서는 단...
미국에서 적극적조치(Affirmative Action)를 둘러싸고 전개되었던 논쟁을 제도의 필요성, 효과성, 정당성, 역기능의 네 가지 논점을 중심으로 살펴본다. 제도의 효과성에 대한 비판에 대해서는 단순히 사실을 드러내는 방식으로 충분한 답변이 되지만, 다른 세가지 논점은 다음과 같은 두 가지 점에서의 근본적인 인식의 차이를 반영한다.
첫째, 적극적조치의 반대론자와 옹호론자를 구분 짓는 가장 근본적인 인식의 차이는 현행 사회의 작동방식 즉, 사회시스템의 완전성에 대한 신뢰 여부를 반영한다. 적극적 조치의 반대론자들은 현재 사회의 작동원리는 업적주의이고 이것이 제대로 작동하지 못하는 경우에 한해서 차별이라는 문제가 발생한다고 보는데 비해서, 이 제도의 옹호론자는 현재 사회에서 수용되고 있는 업적주의는 그 자체로 공정성이 결여되어 있다고 보는 차이가 있다.
두 번째로 적극적조치의 반대론자와 옹호론자를 구분 짓는 근본적인 차이는 과거차별과 현재차별의 연관성에 대한 인식 차이에 있다. 과거에는 차별이 있었고 이것이 문제가 되었지만 이제는 더 이상의 차별을 금지한다면 추가적인 피해자는 없으므로 차별 문제는 해소되는 것이라고 보게 되면 적극적조치의 필요성을 인정하지 않게 된다. 이런 시각에서는 과거의 잘못을 현재에 보상하려고 한다는 점과 개인이 당한 피해를 집단적으로 보상하려고 한다는 점에서 적극적조치의 정당성에 의문을 제기한다.
미국의 오랜 적극적조치 논쟁은 목표치가 외부에 의해서 강제적으로 주어지는 할당제에 대한 강한 거부감을 드러내고 있으며, 우대조치는 일정한 자격요견을 갖춘 대상자 중에서 소수자에 대한 우대를 실시하는 것이 제도에 대한 사회적 수용성을 높일 수 있음을 보여주고 있다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper reviews 40 years debates on Affirmative Action in the United States of America, focusing on the subjects of necessity, effectiveness, legitimacy, and dysfunction. The effectiveness of the Affirmative Action has been revealed in the history....
This paper reviews 40 years debates on Affirmative Action in the United States of America, focusing on the subjects of necessity, effectiveness, legitimacy, and dysfunction. The effectiveness of the Affirmative Action has been revealed in the history. The debates on the other three subjects reflect the perspectives on the following two aspects.
One of the most important differences between advocates and opponents of the Affirmative Action comes from the belief on the meritocratic social system. The opponents believe that the society is dominated by the meritocracy and that discrimination appears as a social problem just in case that the meritocracy malfunctions. On the other hand, the advocates raise questions if the so-called “meritocracy” is fair in the real world.
The other difference between advocates and opponents of the Affirmative Action is based on the perspectives on the relationship between the past and the current discriminations. Opponents believe that the ordinary discrimination acts works fine to prevent further discrimination against women and minorities. In this perspective, the Affirmative Action is not legitimate because white males who are innocent of acts having caused harm nonetheless being forced to provide restitution for such acts.
On the other hand, advocates of the Affirmative Action argue that preferential treatment be justified in terms of distributive justice. In this perspective, the ordinary discrimination acts are not enough and 'leveling the ground' should be necessary to solve the discrimination problem because the current discrimination is closely related with the past one.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "적극적 고용개선조치 제도 매뉴얼. 노동부." 노동부 2006
2 "적극적 고용개선조치 도입관련 자료집" 노동부 2005
3 "선진국의 적극적 고용개선조치 사례연구’ AA-net 워킹페이퍼 시리즈 AA2005-9." 2005
4 "pp. 83-88. in Debating Affirmative Action and The Politics of Inclusion edited by Mills" 4-, 1994
5 "in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 1220 57-40 77, 19932004
6 "Who has benefited from Affirmative Action in employment? edited by Curry" Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc. 77-96, 1996
7 "White Males and the Crisis of Affirmative Action. New York" 1991
8 "We Won't Go Back: Making the case for Affirmative Action" Houghton Mifflin Company. 1997
9 "The University of Michigan Press." 1992
10 "The Shape of the River Long-term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions" Princeton Princeton University Press. 1998
1 "적극적 고용개선조치 제도 매뉴얼. 노동부." 노동부 2006
2 "적극적 고용개선조치 도입관련 자료집" 노동부 2005
3 "선진국의 적극적 고용개선조치 사례연구’ AA-net 워킹페이퍼 시리즈 AA2005-9." 2005
4 "pp. 83-88. in Debating Affirmative Action and The Politics of Inclusion edited by Mills" 4-, 1994
5 "in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 1220 57-40 77, 19932004
6 "Who has benefited from Affirmative Action in employment? edited by Curry" Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc. 77-96, 1996
7 "White Males and the Crisis of Affirmative Action. New York" 1991
8 "We Won't Go Back: Making the case for Affirmative Action" Houghton Mifflin Company. 1997
9 "The University of Michigan Press." 1992
10 "The Shape of the River Long-term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions" Princeton Princeton University Press. 1998
11 "The Remedy: Class, Race, and Affirmative Action" A New Republic Book 1995
12 "The Limits of compensatory Justice pp. 281-310. in Nomos 33 edited by Chapman" New York University Press. 1991
13 "The Impact of Affirmative Action on Labor Demand ATest of Some Implications of the Le Chatelier Principle Review of Economics and Statistics in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 251 363-60 372, 19922004
14 "The Impact of Affirmative Action on Employment Journal of Labor Economics in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 439 154-63 178, 19842004
15 "The Future of Affirmative Action" 84 : 953-, 1996
16 "The Future of Affirmative Action" 1996
17 "The Enforcement of Equal Opportunity Law Under Imperfect Information Quarterly Journal of Economics in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 309 39-26 56, 19912004
18 "The End of Affirmative Action Where do we go from here?" A Birch Lane Press Book. 1996
19 "The Economics of Discrimination" University of Chicago Press. 1971
20 "The Constitutional Logic of Affirmative Action,Durham,N.C." Duke University Press. 1992
21 "The Affirmative Action Fraud: can we restore the American civil rights vision?," Cato Institute 1996
22 "Social Justice or Reverse Discrimination?" Prometheus Books 1997
23 "Reversing discrimination:The Case for Affirmative Action,International Publisher" New York. 1992
24 "Reparations to Wronged Groups" 2002
25 "Patricia J.(1991" The Alchemy of Race and Rights harvarduniv.press
26 "One by One from the Inside Out:Essays and Reviews on Race and Responsibility in America,New York" Free Press. 1995
27 "Mentoring and Diversity" 90 (90): 765-786, 2002
28 "Losing Ground:American Social Policy 1950-1980,New York" Basic. 1984
29 "Introduction"pp.-v. in The Affirmative Action Debate" 2002
30 "In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government" 1988
31 "Good for Business Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital. Washington" U.S. Government printing Office. 1995
32 "From the Realities of Affirmative Action in Employment Debating Affirmative Action in Education and Employment edited by Crosby The University of Michigan press." The University of Michigan press 103-113, 2000
33 "From not all black and white: Affirmative Action, Race and American Values" The University of Michigan press 97-102, 2000
34 "From Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby Debating Affirmative Action in Education and Employment edited by Crosby The University of Michigan press." The University of Michigan press. 150-158, 2000
35 "Expert Testimony in Defense of Affirmative Action Debating Affirmative Action in Education and Employment edited by Crosby The University of Michigan press." The University of Michigan press 124-133, 2000
36 "Employment and Occupational Advance Under Affirmative Action Review of Economics and Statistics in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 377 179-86 187, 1984b2004
37 "Employment Quotas for Minorities Journal of Political Economy in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 3-38, 19762004
38 "Employment Quotas for Minorities Journal of Political Economy in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 3-38, 19762004
39 "Does the Contract Compliance Program Work? An Analysis of Chicago Data in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 544 133-64 153, 19762004
40 "Discrimination and Morally Relevant Characteristics" 1-, 2002
41 "Class-Based Affirmative Action: Lessons and Caveats" Lessons and Caveats. Taxas Law Review 74. 74 : 1996
42 "Civil Wrongs:What Went Wrong with Affirmative Action,San Francisco" Institute for Contemporary Studies. 1994
43 "Backfire: A Reporter's Look at Affirmative Action, Washington" Regnery Publishing Inc. 1996
44 "Are Affirmative Action Hires Less Qualified? Evidence from Employer-Employee Data on New Hires Journal of Labor Economics in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 17 (17): 534 373-69 408, 1999
45 "Antidiscrimination or Reverse discrimination The Impact of Changing Demographics and Affirmative Action on Productivity Journal of Human Resources in The Economics of Affirmative Action edited by Holzer" 145 333-74 362, 1984a2004
46 "An Equal Chance" The University of Michigan press 58-59, 2000
47 "Affirmative Discrimination:Ethic Inequality and Public Policy,New York" Basic Books. 1975
48 "Affirmative Action:A Problem or a Remedy?,Minneapolis" Lerner Publications Company. 1997
49 "Affirmative Action: Social Justice or Unfair Preference?," Rowan & Littlefield Publishers INC. 1996
50 "Affirmative Action: Con" Rowan & Littlefield Publishers INC. 1996
51 "Affirmative Action: A Reference Handbook" ABC-CLIO, Inc 1999
52 "Affirmative Action is dead; long live affirmative action" yale university press 2004
53 "1. Thinking about Affirmative Action in In Defense of Affirmative Action" A New Republic Book BasicBooks. 1-31, 1996
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 평가 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.45 | 1.58 | 1.768 | 0.36 |
로그인하고 관련된 다양한 학술자료를 확인해 보세요.
로그인