RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    모바일 애플리케이션 업데이트 선택에 대한 사용자 후회 = User`s Regret on Update Decisions of Mobile Applications

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101074602

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose While new versions of mobile applications could offer users better computing environment, users are not always comfortable with them for various reasons. Considering making update decisions is important task for users, it is crucial for us to understand users`` behavior and attitude on app updates. The purpose of this study is to explain why mobile users succumb to both reactance toward the update and satisfaction to the current version, ultimately leading them to feel the regret by employing three theoretical perspectives including regret theory, status quo bias theory and the dual model. Design/methodology/approach Survey data collected from 204 mobile users was used to test the research model using partial least squares analysis. The results have shown that both reactance toward the update and satisfaction to the current version have negative impacts on individuals`` decisions to update, which leading to their regret after updating the applications Findings By integrating both status quo bias and regret theory in the model, this study tried to explain why mobile users feel regret in application update settings. More specifically, this study has proposed a novel framework that introduces an individual``s update decision on mobile applications.
    번역하기

    Purpose While new versions of mobile applications could offer users better computing environment, users are not always comfortable with them for various reasons. Considering making update decisions is important task for users, it is crucial for us to ...

    Purpose While new versions of mobile applications could offer users better computing environment, users are not always comfortable with them for various reasons. Considering making update decisions is important task for users, it is crucial for us to understand users`` behavior and attitude on app updates. The purpose of this study is to explain why mobile users succumb to both reactance toward the update and satisfaction to the current version, ultimately leading them to feel the regret by employing three theoretical perspectives including regret theory, status quo bias theory and the dual model. Design/methodology/approach Survey data collected from 204 mobile users was used to test the research model using partial least squares analysis. The results have shown that both reactance toward the update and satisfaction to the current version have negative impacts on individuals`` decisions to update, which leading to their regret after updating the applications Findings By integrating both status quo bias and regret theory in the model, this study tried to explain why mobile users feel regret in application update settings. More specifically, this study has proposed a novel framework that introduces an individual``s update decision on mobile applications.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박세훈, "현상유지편향을 조절하는 요인에 관한 연구" 한국마케팅학회 24 (24): 149-171, 2009

    2 박상철, "스마트워크 환경에서 스마트 기기 활용에 따른 사용자 저항과 개인 생산성에 관한 연구" 한국정보시스템학회 23 (23): 143-164, 2014

    3 정원진, "사용자 인지기능을 매개로 스마트폰 애플리케이션의 사용자환경 디자인이 애플리케이션 이용성과에 미치는 영향" 한국정보시스템학회 23 (23): 1-23, 2014

    4 박상철, "근시안적 손실회피 관점에서 본 모바일 애플리케이션 사용자의 현상유지 편향에 관한 연구" 한국정보시스템학회 24 (24): 189-208, 2015

    5 Bhattacherjee, A., "Why End-Users Move to the Cloud: A Migration-Theoretic Analysis" 23 (23): 357-372, 2014

    6 Fuchs, C., "Using Single-Item Measures for Construct Measurement in Management Research" 69 : 195-210, 2009

    7 Venkatesh, V., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

    8 Parthasarathy, M., "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services" 9 (9): 362-379, 1998

    9 Bhattacherjee, A., "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model" 25 (25): 351-370, 2001

    10 Hsieh, J. J. P., "Understanding Digital Inequality:Comparing Continued Use Behavioral Models of the Socio-Economically Advantaged and Disadvantaged" 32 (32): 97-126, 2008

    1 박세훈, "현상유지편향을 조절하는 요인에 관한 연구" 한국마케팅학회 24 (24): 149-171, 2009

    2 박상철, "스마트워크 환경에서 스마트 기기 활용에 따른 사용자 저항과 개인 생산성에 관한 연구" 한국정보시스템학회 23 (23): 143-164, 2014

    3 정원진, "사용자 인지기능을 매개로 스마트폰 애플리케이션의 사용자환경 디자인이 애플리케이션 이용성과에 미치는 영향" 한국정보시스템학회 23 (23): 1-23, 2014

    4 박상철, "근시안적 손실회피 관점에서 본 모바일 애플리케이션 사용자의 현상유지 편향에 관한 연구" 한국정보시스템학회 24 (24): 189-208, 2015

    5 Bhattacherjee, A., "Why End-Users Move to the Cloud: A Migration-Theoretic Analysis" 23 (23): 357-372, 2014

    6 Fuchs, C., "Using Single-Item Measures for Construct Measurement in Management Research" 69 : 195-210, 2009

    7 Venkatesh, V., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

    8 Parthasarathy, M., "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services" 9 (9): 362-379, 1998

    9 Bhattacherjee, A., "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model" 25 (25): 351-370, 2001

    10 Hsieh, J. J. P., "Understanding Digital Inequality:Comparing Continued Use Behavioral Models of the Socio-Economically Advantaged and Disadvantaged" 32 (32): 97-126, 2008

    11 Wong, K. F. E., "The Role of Anticipated Regret in Escalation of Commitment" 92 (92): 545-554, 2007

    12 Kahneman, D., "The Psychology of Preferences" 246 : 160-173, 1982

    13 Schwartz, B., "The Paradox of Choice - Why More is Less" MP3Una edition 2014

    14 Geyskens, I., "The Effects of Trust and Interdependence on Relationship Commitment: A Trans-Atlantic Study" 13 (13): 303-317, 1996

    15 Tykocinski, O. E., "The Consequences of Doing Nothing:Inaction Inertia as Avoidance of Anticipate Counterfactual Regret" 75 (75): 607-616, 1998

    16 Jones, M. A., "Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services" 76 (76): 259-274, 2000

    17 Samuelson, W., "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making" 1 (1): 7-59, 1988

    18 Wanous, J.P., "Single-Item Reliability: A Replication and Extension" 4 : 361-375, 2001

    19 Polites, G.L., "Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance" 36 (36): 21-42, 2012

    20 Connolly, T., "Regret in Economic and Psychological Theories of Choice" 19 (19): 139-154, 2006

    21 Bell, D. E., "Regret in Decision-Making under Uncertainty" 30 (30): 961-981, 1982

    22 Connolly, T., "Regret in Decision Making" 11 (11): 212-216, 2002

    23 Loomes, G., "Regret Theory:An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty" 92 : 805-824, 1982

    24 Kahneman, D., "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk" 7 (7): 263-291, 1979

    25 Ajzen, I., "Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior" 32 (32): 665-683, 2002

    26 Wanous, J. P., "Overall Job Satisfaction: How Good Are Single Item Measures?" 82 : 247-252, 1997

    27 Kim, S. S., "Out of Dedication or Constraint? A Dual Model of Post-Adoption Phenomena and its Empirical Test in the Context of Online Services" 33 (33): 49-70, 2009

    28 van Dijk, E., "On the Psychology of ‘if only’: Regret and the Comparison between Factual and Counterfactual Outcomes" 97 (97): 152-160, 2005

    29 Hair, J. F., Jr., "Multivariate Data Analysis" Prentice-Hall 1998

    30 Robins, R. W., "Measuring Global Self-Esteem:Construct Validation of A Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale" 27 : 151-161, 2001

    31 Kim, H.W., "Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective" 33 (33): 567-582, 2009

    32 Preece, J., Y., "Interaction Design" John Wiley

    33 Fornell, C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error" 18 (18): 39-50, 1981

    34 Bendapudi, N., "Customers`Motivations for Maintaining Relationships with Service Providers" 73 (73): 15-37, 1997

    35 Compeau, D. R., "Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test" 19 (19): 189-211,

    36 Igbaria, M., "Computer Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Microcomputer Use" 9 : 229-241, 1990

    37 Zeelenberg, M., "Anticipated Regret, Expected Feedback and Behavioral Decision Making" 12 : 93-106, 1999

    38 Gefen, D., "A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity using PLS-Graph:Tutorial and Annotated Example" 16 : 91-109, 2005

    39 Keil, M., "A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects" 24 (24): 299-325, 2000

    40 Jasperson, J., "A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems" 29 (29): 525-557, 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.19 1.19 1.28
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.31 1.21 1.379 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼