RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    교수유형 (teaching styles) 분석을 위한 준거 탐색 = The Investigation on the Criteria for the Analysis of Teaching Styles

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40116227

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The main purpose of this study is to investigate on the criteria for the analysis of teaching styles. The former studies of teaching have been largely focused on effective teaching behaviors, but teachers` educational perspectives such as teaching purposes, beliefs and attitudes have been overlooked in the process-product studies. So, for promoting the teaching effectiveness, researchers need to study the teachers` teaching styles. Teaching styles represent the total of teachers values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Therefore teaching style is how teachers philosophically approach and then conduct moments of instruction. This means that teaching behaviors are based on the teachers` beliefs and attitudes. The relationship between the teachers beliefs and the behaviors of teachers has been the focus of much recent research of teaching. Many researchers have argued that teachers beliefs-practice(behaviors) congruency is an element of effective and good teaching. But many teachers have beliefs about teaching and learning that do not correlate with their behaviors in the teaching-learning process. This discrepancy between behavior and belief can ultimately result in conflict in the teaching-learning exchange. Therefore, researches of the teaching effectiveness should be focused on the study of teaching styles which are composed of teaching behaviors and beliefs. This article is aimed at conceptualize the criteria of teaching styles analysis which are logical teaching behaviors, strategic teaching behaviors, and teaching beliefs. As a result, the criteria of the teaching style analysis were suggested, consisting of three dimensions and three elements within each dimension. These are the dimension of logical teaching behaviors(constructing of instructional contents, explanation, identification of contents attainment), the dimension of strategic teaching behaviors(motivation, questioning, management of learning behaviors), and the dimension of teaching beliefs(about learners, teaching and learning, teachers themselves).
    번역하기

    The main purpose of this study is to investigate on the criteria for the analysis of teaching styles. The former studies of teaching have been largely focused on effective teaching behaviors, but teachers` educational perspectives such as teaching pur...

    The main purpose of this study is to investigate on the criteria for the analysis of teaching styles. The former studies of teaching have been largely focused on effective teaching behaviors, but teachers` educational perspectives such as teaching purposes, beliefs and attitudes have been overlooked in the process-product studies. So, for promoting the teaching effectiveness, researchers need to study the teachers` teaching styles. Teaching styles represent the total of teachers values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Therefore teaching style is how teachers philosophically approach and then conduct moments of instruction. This means that teaching behaviors are based on the teachers` beliefs and attitudes. The relationship between the teachers beliefs and the behaviors of teachers has been the focus of much recent research of teaching. Many researchers have argued that teachers beliefs-practice(behaviors) congruency is an element of effective and good teaching. But many teachers have beliefs about teaching and learning that do not correlate with their behaviors in the teaching-learning process. This discrepancy between behavior and belief can ultimately result in conflict in the teaching-learning exchange. Therefore, researches of the teaching effectiveness should be focused on the study of teaching styles which are composed of teaching behaviors and beliefs. This article is aimed at conceptualize the criteria of teaching styles analysis which are logical teaching behaviors, strategic teaching behaviors, and teaching beliefs. As a result, the criteria of the teaching style analysis were suggested, consisting of three dimensions and three elements within each dimension. These are the dimension of logical teaching behaviors(constructing of instructional contents, explanation, identification of contents attainment), the dimension of strategic teaching behaviors(motivation, questioning, management of learning behaviors), and the dimension of teaching beliefs(about learners, teaching and learning, teachers themselves).

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "수업의 효율성 제고를 위한 교사 변인 탐색 연구" 205-223, 1987

    2 "교수효과 평가를 위한 준거체제 탐색 연구 . 교육학연구" 157-172, 1992

    3 "the Tuckman teacher feedback form. The Journal of Educational Measurement" 233-237, 1976

    4 "foundations of practice. New York" 1982

    5 "clearing up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research" 307-332, 1992

    6 "a review of process-product research. New York American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education." 1977

    7 "Teachers: beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee(3rd Eds.). Handbook of Educational Psychology, New York" Macmillan. 1996

    8 "Teachers' opinions and the ideational basis of education. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research" 1981182-191.

    9 "Office of Program Evaluation College of Education." . Michigan State University educational beliefs inventory. East Lansing 1982

    10 "Identifying your teaching style. In M. W. Galbraith(Ed.). Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction(2nd ed.). Florida" Krieger Publishing Company. 1998

    1 "수업의 효율성 제고를 위한 교사 변인 탐색 연구" 205-223, 1987

    2 "교수효과 평가를 위한 준거체제 탐색 연구 . 교육학연구" 157-172, 1992

    3 "the Tuckman teacher feedback form. The Journal of Educational Measurement" 233-237, 1976

    4 "foundations of practice. New York" 1982

    5 "clearing up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research" 307-332, 1992

    6 "a review of process-product research. New York American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education." 1977

    7 "Teachers: beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee(3rd Eds.). Handbook of Educational Psychology, New York" Macmillan. 1996

    8 "Teachers' opinions and the ideational basis of education. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research" 1981182-191.

    9 "Office of Program Evaluation College of Education." . Michigan State University educational beliefs inventory. East Lansing 1982

    10 "Identifying your teaching style. In M. W. Galbraith(Ed.). Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction(2nd ed.). Florida" Krieger Publishing Company. 1998

    11 "Effective teaching methods(4th). New York" Prentice-Hall. 2000

    12 "A way of understanding the practical knowledge of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education" 123-136, 1992

    13 "A correlation study between the Van Tilburg/ Heimlich Sensitivity Measure and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator of adult educators in Ohio. Unpublished doctoral dissertation" The Ohio State University 1990

    14 ". 발문법 원론. 서울" 세광출판사. 1986

    15 ". 문답 유형과 학업성취와의 관계에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문" 서울대학교 1970

    16 ". 국민학교 교사의 자질 요인별 교사·학생 언어적 상호작용에 대한 분석적 연구. 석사학위논문" 연세대학교 1984

    17 ". 교사효율성에 대한 학생평정과 그 피드백의 효과에 관한 분석적 연구. 박사학위논문" 동국대학교 1982

    18 ". 교사의 자질별 교사·학생 언어적 상호작용에 대한 분석적 연구. 석사학위논문" 서울대학교 1969

    19 ". 교사의 수업행동 진단척도 개발과 그 타당화 연구. 박사학위논문" 인하대학교 1994

    20 ". 교사의 개념수준과 수업의 언어 상호작용과의 관계에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문" 한국교원대학교 1992

    21 ". 교사와 교육. 서울" 형설출판사. 1988

    22 ". When teachers face themselves. New York" Teachers College Press. 1955

    23 ". The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R. M. W. Travers Second handbook of research on teaching" 122-183, 1973

    24 ". The teaching of science as inquiry. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist" 1958

    25 ". The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practice in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal" 559-586, 1991

    26 ". The professional education of teachers. Boston" Allyn and Bacon. 1978

    27 ". The activity of teaching. New York" McGraw-Hill. 1971

    28 ". Teaching styles and technology. In E. R. Hayes New Directions for Continuing Education" Jossey-Bass. -43, 1989

    29 ". Teaching styles and pupil progress. Massachusetts" Harvard University Press. 1976

    30 ". Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching" Macmillan. 1986

    31 ". Teachers' theories about children's learning. In J. Calderhead" Falmer Press. 128-145, 1988

    32 ". Teacher beliefs-practice congruency. Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning" 20-27, 1983

    33 ". Teacher behavior can be evaluated. In M. Mohan. & R. E. Hull." Inc. 43-66, 1975

    34 ". Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching" Macmillan. 1986

    35 ". Teacher Beliefs and The Cultures of Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education" 33-39, 1988

    36 ". Synthesis of research on teachers' questioning. Educational Leadership" 40-47, 1984

    37 ". Synthesis of research on strategies for motivation students to learn. Educational Leadership" 1987

    38 ". Stability of teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal" 245-252, 1973

    39 ". Review of research on teacher communication styles with use of Leary's model. Journal of Classroom Interaction" 1-11, 1992

    40 ". Relationship between perceived learning style and teaching style of junior college educators. Community/Junior College Quarterly" 169-177, 1987

    41 ". Predicting Elementary Classroom Teaching Practices from Teachers' Educational Beliefs. New York Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association." 1982

    42 ". Optimum Teacher-Pupil Interaction for Pupil Growth. Educational Leadership 2 of 3" 275-280, 1968

    43 ". Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth an overview of their current status. New Jersey" 1983

    44 ". Interaction Analysis in the Classroom A Manual for Observers School of Education University of Minnesota." 1964

    45 ". Images of teaching Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education" 1-8, 1991

    46 ". Flanders 언어모형에 의한 교사 - 아동의 언어적 상호작용 분석. 석사학위논문" 중앙대학교 1990

    47 ". Explaining" McGraw-Hill. 1970

    48 ". Developing teaching style in adult education. San Francisco" Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1994

    49 ". Classroom organization and management. Elementary School Journal" 1983

    50 ". Classroom instruction in reading. In P. D. Pearson Handbook of reading research. New York" 1984

    51 ". Assessing teaching style in continuing education. In E. R. Hayes. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education" Jossey-Bass. 1989

    52 ". Alternative roles for learners with particular reference to learners as democratic explorers in teacher education courses. The School Field" 61-77, 1990

    53 ". A techniques for the assessment of teacher directness. The Journal of Educational Research" 395-400, 1970

    54 ". A study of student perceptions of physics teacher behavior. Journal of Research in Science Teaching" 335-350, 1990

    55 ". A new paradigm for heuristic research in teaching styles. Religious Education" 9-41, 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼