RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미·한 육군 신속획득 생태계 비교 분석을 통한 한국형 연속적 변혁체계 제안: 미 육군 '연속적 변혁' 전략과 한국 육군 '드론봇 챌린지' 사례를 중심으로 = A Proposal for a Korean Continuous Transformation System through a Comparative Analysis of the U.S. and ROK Army Rapid Acquisition Ecosystems: Focusing on the U.S. Army's 'Continuous Transformation' Strategy and the ROK Army's 'Dronebot Challenge' Cases

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110471773

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recent modern warfare, including the war in Ukraine, highlights the rapid integration of advanced commercial technologies as a critical factor for battlefield superiority. Responding to this, the U.S. Army's "Continuous Transformation" strategy has established a seamless agile acquisition ecosystem.
    They achieved a rapid procurement and field feedback cycle by integrating programs from discovery (xTech) to mass production (SkyFoundry) with Soldier Touch Points (STP). In contrast, while the Republic of Korea (ROK) Army successfully evolved its 'Dronebot Challenge' into a demonstration-centric feedback system in 2025, it still suffers from structural disconnects in its acquisition pipeline, where verified technologies fail to lead to immediate formal procurement and mass production. This study attempts to overcome these limitations by comparing the rapid-acquisition ecosystems of both armies and by developing the Korean Continuous Transformation (CT-K) system from an Agile framework perspective. Specifically, it suggests legislating the Korea Capability Sprint Model (K-CSM) to institutionalize a fast-track pipeline and establishing the Army Continuous Transformation Control Office (A-CTCO) as a control tower. This methodology will serve as a foundational step for the ROK Army to secure overwhelming advantages in future warfare through realistic and agile acquisition by unifying fragmented demonstration programs.
    번역하기

    Recent modern warfare, including the war in Ukraine, highlights the rapid integration of advanced commercial technologies as a critical factor for battlefield superiority. Responding to this, the U.S. Army's "Continuous Transformation" strategy has es...

    Recent modern warfare, including the war in Ukraine, highlights the rapid integration of advanced commercial technologies as a critical factor for battlefield superiority. Responding to this, the U.S. Army's "Continuous Transformation" strategy has established a seamless agile acquisition ecosystem.
    They achieved a rapid procurement and field feedback cycle by integrating programs from discovery (xTech) to mass production (SkyFoundry) with Soldier Touch Points (STP). In contrast, while the Republic of Korea (ROK) Army successfully evolved its 'Dronebot Challenge' into a demonstration-centric feedback system in 2025, it still suffers from structural disconnects in its acquisition pipeline, where verified technologies fail to lead to immediate formal procurement and mass production. This study attempts to overcome these limitations by comparing the rapid-acquisition ecosystems of both armies and by developing the Korean Continuous Transformation (CT-K) system from an Agile framework perspective. Specifically, it suggests legislating the Korea Capability Sprint Model (K-CSM) to institutionalize a fast-track pipeline and establishing the Army Continuous Transformation Control Office (A-CTCO) as a control tower. This methodology will serve as a foundational step for the ROK Army to secure overwhelming advantages in future warfare through realistic and agile acquisition by unifying fragmented demonstration programs.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    연관 공개강의(KOCW)

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼