RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    빌리 그레이엄과 미국복음주의 = Billy Graham and American Evangelicalism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106238702

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The American evangelicalism began to appear in church history by distinguishing itself from fundamentalism in the early 1940s. The foundation of the National Association of Evangelicalism(1942), the opening of Fuller Theological Seminary(1947), the publication of Uneasy Conscience of Fundamentalism(1947)and Christianity Today(1956), and Billy Grahsm's New York Crusade(1957) were only a few of the symbolic examples of such a distinction. And Charles Fuller, Herold J. Ockenga, Carl Henry, and Billy Graham played essential roles in this course. At first, though they called themselves neo-evangelicals, they soon came to be known just simply as evangelicals. Then, how should we understand the relationship between Graham and evangelicalism? Simply speaking, Graham played a decisive role in the course of birth, growth, and maturity of (neo) evangelicalism as a new stream which was distinguished from both fundamentalism and liberalism. First of all, he privided a desicive cause and momentum for the separation between evangelicalism and fundamentalism. Secondly, Graham made a significant contribution to the expansion and promotion of the status of evangelicalism in America. Thirdly, he helped evangelicalism to spread out all over the world. Finally, he also made an important impact upon the development of evangelicalism in Korea. However, he also left behind not a few of legacies with which evangelicals have to struggle. First, his too close relationship with presidents made a negative mark on both his reputation and that of evangelicalism.Thus, evangelicals of this generation need to approach the relationship between church and state more carefully. Secondly, evangelicals should do their best to overcome the shackle of anti-intellectualism of which Graham was harshly accused. In fact, there is no reason that the Word of God clashes with a human intellect. Thirdly, evangelicals need to respond to the various social problems with more serious responsibility. The more the world is getting complicated, the more comprehensive and practical solution is asked for.
    번역하기

    The American evangelicalism began to appear in church history by distinguishing itself from fundamentalism in the early 1940s. The foundation of the National Association of Evangelicalism(1942), the opening of Fuller Theological Seminary(1947), the pu...

    The American evangelicalism began to appear in church history by distinguishing itself from fundamentalism in the early 1940s. The foundation of the National Association of Evangelicalism(1942), the opening of Fuller Theological Seminary(1947), the publication of Uneasy Conscience of Fundamentalism(1947)and Christianity Today(1956), and Billy Grahsm's New York Crusade(1957) were only a few of the symbolic examples of such a distinction. And Charles Fuller, Herold J. Ockenga, Carl Henry, and Billy Graham played essential roles in this course. At first, though they called themselves neo-evangelicals, they soon came to be known just simply as evangelicals. Then, how should we understand the relationship between Graham and evangelicalism? Simply speaking, Graham played a decisive role in the course of birth, growth, and maturity of (neo) evangelicalism as a new stream which was distinguished from both fundamentalism and liberalism. First of all, he privided a desicive cause and momentum for the separation between evangelicalism and fundamentalism. Secondly, Graham made a significant contribution to the expansion and promotion of the status of evangelicalism in America. Thirdly, he helped evangelicalism to spread out all over the world. Finally, he also made an important impact upon the development of evangelicalism in Korea. However, he also left behind not a few of legacies with which evangelicals have to struggle. First, his too close relationship with presidents made a negative mark on both his reputation and that of evangelicalism.Thus, evangelicals of this generation need to approach the relationship between church and state more carefully. Secondly, evangelicals should do their best to overcome the shackle of anti-intellectualism of which Graham was harshly accused. In fact, there is no reason that the Word of God clashes with a human intellect. Thirdly, evangelicals need to respond to the various social problems with more serious responsibility. The more the world is getting complicated, the more comprehensive and practical solution is asked for.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼