RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개인차, 피드백 유형 및 규칙 복잡성 간의 상호작용이 한국어 학습자의 제2언어습득에 미치는 효과 연구 = Effects of Interactions among Individual Differences, Feedback Type and Rule Complexity on the Acquisition of Korean as a Second Language

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103676649

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigated the effects of three-way interactions among individual differences (i.e., language aptitude and working memory capacity), feedback type (i.e., explicit vs. implicit), and rule complexity (i.e., simple vs. complex) on the acquisition of Korean by learners of Korean as a second language. The main research findings were as follows: (1) there was a positive effect of working memory on the acquisition of the target structures only when explicit feedback was provided; (2) working memory facilitated the development of explicit knowledge of a simple rule (i.e., Korean honorifics), whereas it did not contribute to the development of explicit knowledge of a complex rule (i.e., Korean morphological causatives); and (3) the type of corrective feedback affected the acquisition of both explicit and implicit knowledge of the target structures, regardless of rule complexity. Limitations of the study and implications for future research were also discussed.
    번역하기

    This study investigated the effects of three-way interactions among individual differences (i.e., language aptitude and working memory capacity), feedback type (i.e., explicit vs. implicit), and rule complexity (i.e., simple vs. complex) on the acquis...

    This study investigated the effects of three-way interactions among individual differences (i.e., language aptitude and working memory capacity), feedback type (i.e., explicit vs. implicit), and rule complexity (i.e., simple vs. complex) on the acquisition of Korean by learners of Korean as a second language. The main research findings were as follows: (1) there was a positive effect of working memory on the acquisition of the target structures only when explicit feedback was provided; (2) working memory facilitated the development of explicit knowledge of a simple rule (i.e., Korean honorifics), whereas it did not contribute to the development of explicit knowledge of a complex rule (i.e., Korean morphological causatives); and (3) the type of corrective feedback affected the acquisition of both explicit and implicit knowledge of the target structures, regardless of rule complexity. Limitations of the study and implications for future research were also discussed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이은하, "한국어 학습자의 인지적·정의적 개인차 요인과 제2언어 성취 간의 관계" 이중언어학회 (46) : 253-296, 2011

    2 안지은, "오류 고쳐 되말하기와 개인차 요인이 중국인 한국어 학습자의 단형 사동 습득에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 국제대학원 2012

    3 설수연, "서면으로 제공되는 수정적 피드백, 제2언어적성 및 학습자 태도가 한국어 조사 습득에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 국제대학원 2011

    4 Ellis, N, "Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order" 49 (49): 234-250, 1996

    5 DeKeyser, R. M, "What makes learning second-language grammar difficult?" 55 (55): 1-25, 2005

    6 Hulstijn, J, "Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge?" 11 : 97-112, 1994

    7 Dörnyei, Z, "The psychology of second language acquisition" Oxford University Press 2009

    8 Williams, J. N, "The new handbook of second language acquisition" Emerald 319-353, 2009

    9 Ehrman, M. E, "The learning and teaching of Slavic languages and cultures: Toward the 21st century" Slavica 109-133, 2000

    10 Green, P. S, "The language laboratory in school: The York study" Oliver and Boyd 1975

    1 이은하, "한국어 학습자의 인지적·정의적 개인차 요인과 제2언어 성취 간의 관계" 이중언어학회 (46) : 253-296, 2011

    2 안지은, "오류 고쳐 되말하기와 개인차 요인이 중국인 한국어 학습자의 단형 사동 습득에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 국제대학원 2012

    3 설수연, "서면으로 제공되는 수정적 피드백, 제2언어적성 및 학습자 태도가 한국어 조사 습득에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 국제대학원 2011

    4 Ellis, N, "Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order" 49 (49): 234-250, 1996

    5 DeKeyser, R. M, "What makes learning second-language grammar difficult?" 55 (55): 1-25, 2005

    6 Hulstijn, J, "Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge?" 11 : 97-112, 1994

    7 Dörnyei, Z, "The psychology of second language acquisition" Oxford University Press 2009

    8 Williams, J. N, "The new handbook of second language acquisition" Emerald 319-353, 2009

    9 Ehrman, M. E, "The learning and teaching of Slavic languages and cultures: Toward the 21st century" Slavica 109-133, 2000

    10 Green, P. S, "The language laboratory in school: The York study" Oliver and Boyd 1975

    11 Krashen, S, "The input hypothesis: Issues and implications" Longman 1985

    12 DeKeyser, R. M, "The handbook of second language acquisition" Blackwell 313-348, 2003

    13 Petersen, C. R, "The development of the defense language aptitude battery (DLAB)" 36 (36): 369-380, 1976

    14 Sasaki, M, "Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses" Peter Lang 1996

    15 Krashen, S, "Second language acquisition and second language learning" Pergamon Press 1981

    16 Juffs, A, "Representation, processing, and working memory in a second language" 102 : 199-225, 2004

    17 Felser, C, "Processing wh-dependencies in a second language:a cross-modal priming study" 23 (23): 9-36, 2007

    18 Krashen, S, "Principles and practice in second language acquisition" Pergamon Press 1982

    19 Pimsleur, P, "Pimsleur language aptitude battery (PLAB)" Psychological Corporation 1968

    20 Williams, J. N, "Phonological memory and rule learning" 53 : 67-121, 2003

    21 Carroll, J. B, "Modern language aptitude test" Psychological Corporation 1959

    22 Williams, J. N, "Memory, attention, and inductive learning" 21 (21): 1-48, 1999

    23 Ellis, R, "Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study" 27 (27): 141-172, 2005

    24 O’Malley, J. M, "Learning strategies in second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1990

    25 Robinson, P, "Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions" 18 (18): 27-67, 1996

    26 Parry, T. S, "Language aptitude reconsidered" Prentice Hall 30-66, 1990

    27 Meara, P, "LLAMA language aptitude tests" Lognostics 2005

    28 Engle, R.W, "Is working memory capacity just another name ofr word knowledge?" 82 : 799-804, 1990

    29 Daneman, M, "Individual differences in working memory and reading" 19 : 450-466, 1980

    30 King, J, "Individual differences in syntactic processing : the role of working memory" 30 : 580-602, 1991

    31 Robinson, P, "Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning" 47 (47): 45-99, 1997

    32 Robinson, P, "Individual differences and instructed language learning" John Benjamins 1-10, 2002

    33 Robinson, P, "Individual differences and instructed language learning" John Benjamins 211-266, 2002

    34 Skehan, P, "Individual differences and instructed language learning" John Benjamins 69-94, 2002

    35 Robinson, P, "Individual differences and instructed language learning" John Benjamins 113-133, 2002

    36 Krashen, S, "Implicit and explicit learning of languages" Academic Press 45-77, 1994

    37 DeKeyser, R. M, "Implicit and explicit learning of L2 grammar: A pilot study" 28 (28): 188-194, 1994

    38 Ellis, R, "Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching" Multilingual Matters 3-25, 2009

    39 DeKeyser, R. M, "How implicit can adult second language learning be?" 11 : 83-86, 1994

    40 DeKeyser, R. M, "Handbook of second language teaching" Wiley-Blackwell 119-138, 2009

    41 Norris, J, "Handbook of second language acquisition" Blackwell 717-761, 2003

    42 Miyake, A., "Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention" Lawrence Erlbaum 339-364, 1998

    43 Sparks, R. L, "Foreign language learning differences:Affective or native language aptitude differences?" 75 (75): 3-16, 1991

    44 Mackey, A, "Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity" 60 (60): 501-533, 2010

    45 Norris, J, "Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis" 50 (50): 417-528, 2000

    46 Li, S, "Corrective feedback in perspective: The interface between feedback type, proficiency, the choice of target structure, and learners’ individual differences in working memory and language analytic ability" The Michigan State University 2010

    47 Ehrman, M, "Cognitive styles in the service of language learning" 31 (31): 393-415, 2003

    48 Unsworth, N, "Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology:Attention, working memory, and executive functions" Oxford University Press 19-43, 2005

    49 Ellis, N, "At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge" 27 (27): 305-352, 2005

    50 Juffs, A, "Aspects of working memory in L2 Learning" 44 (44): 137-166, 2011

    51 Robinson, P, "Aptitude and second language acquisition" 25 : 46-73, 2005

    52 Grigorenko, E. L, "A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The canal-F theory and test" 84 (84): 390-405, 2000

    53 Skehan, P, "A cognitive approach to language learning" Oxford University Press 1998

    54 Ehrman, M. E, "A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning" 31 (31): 313-330, 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.01 1.01 1.05
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.05 1 1.563 0.13
    더보기
    해외이동버튼