RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    『혼불』의 텍스트성 ; 『혼불』의 상징어 고찰 = A study on symbolic words in Honbul

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40118984

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper would focus on the syntactic-semantic property and usage-aspects of symbolic words in Honbul, written by Choi-myung hee. It can be summarized as following. Through the analysis of Honbul, I studied that, although the general function of symbolic words was to modify a verb or a verb-phrase as an adverb, occasionally a symbolic word in Honbul was used for modifyng a noun by a direct quotation or a determiner. Furthermore, I made clear that a symbolic word used as a modifier without modified words in Honbul, and used as an one word sentence. A symbolic word in Honbul provided the actuality of a scene using the spacing words and punctuation mards and activated semantic property with implicating the meaning of predicate. In addition, I inquired that the distinctive quality of symbolic words was a metaphor and the repeatability and consistency, which was semantic feature of reiterative type, was notedly expressed with spacing mark in Honbul. We could examine aspects of symbolic words in Honbul like that; the number of symbolic words to be showed more than one time is 1,234 and the ratio of miesis and symbolic words was close to ⅔, which meant those were used only one time is 462, over the ⅓ of total symbolic words` number. This meant that the writter restrained the repetition of symbolic words. The fact that there are a lot of newfangled words in Honbul indicates that she is so creative.
    번역하기

    This paper would focus on the syntactic-semantic property and usage-aspects of symbolic words in Honbul, written by Choi-myung hee. It can be summarized as following. Through the analysis of Honbul, I studied that, although the general function of sy...

    This paper would focus on the syntactic-semantic property and usage-aspects of symbolic words in Honbul, written by Choi-myung hee. It can be summarized as following. Through the analysis of Honbul, I studied that, although the general function of symbolic words was to modify a verb or a verb-phrase as an adverb, occasionally a symbolic word in Honbul was used for modifyng a noun by a direct quotation or a determiner. Furthermore, I made clear that a symbolic word used as a modifier without modified words in Honbul, and used as an one word sentence. A symbolic word in Honbul provided the actuality of a scene using the spacing words and punctuation mards and activated semantic property with implicating the meaning of predicate. In addition, I inquired that the distinctive quality of symbolic words was a metaphor and the repeatability and consistency, which was semantic feature of reiterative type, was notedly expressed with spacing mark in Honbul. We could examine aspects of symbolic words in Honbul like that; the number of symbolic words to be showed more than one time is 1,234 and the ratio of miesis and symbolic words was close to ⅔, which meant those were used only one time is 462, over the ⅓ of total symbolic words` number. This meant that the writter restrained the repetition of symbolic words. The fact that there are a lot of newfangled words in Honbul indicates that she is so creative.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.54 0.54 0.54
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.51 0.5 0.879 0.19
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼