RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Corporate Governance, Financial Slack and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study between US and UK

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104855155

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper presents an empirical analysis of the relationship between financial slack and firm performance using a large panel data set of the U.S.
      and the U.K. firms. Conducting dynamic GMM regressions, the empirical analysis finds that there are the negative relationship between slack and performance in the U.S. and the positive relationship in the U.K. These empirical findings support the hypothesis that the relationship between slack and performance differs across corporate governance systems. The novelty of the paper lies in its demonstration of the conclusion on the role of corporate governance in the relationship between slack and performance as well as the fact that we could obtain the result by comparing the two countries—the U.S. and the U.K—that have been regarded as belonging to a single corporate governance system.
      번역하기

      This paper presents an empirical analysis of the relationship between financial slack and firm performance using a large panel data set of the U.S. and the U.K. firms. Conducting dynamic GMM regressions, the empirical analysis finds that there are the...

      This paper presents an empirical analysis of the relationship between financial slack and firm performance using a large panel data set of the U.S.
      and the U.K. firms. Conducting dynamic GMM regressions, the empirical analysis finds that there are the negative relationship between slack and performance in the U.S. and the positive relationship in the U.K. These empirical findings support the hypothesis that the relationship between slack and performance differs across corporate governance systems. The novelty of the paper lies in its demonstration of the conclusion on the role of corporate governance in the relationship between slack and performance as well as the fact that we could obtain the result by comparing the two countries—the U.S. and the U.K—that have been regarded as belonging to a single corporate governance system.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Penrose, E., "The Theory of the Growth of the Firm" Oxford University Press 1959

      2 Berle, A., "The Modern Corporation and Private Property" Macmillan 1932

      3 Arellano, M., "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations" 58 (58): 277-297, 1991

      4 Daniel, F., "Slack Resources and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis" 57 (57): 565-574, 2004

      5 Moch, M. K., "Review: The Structure of Chaos: Organized Anarchy as a Response to Ambiguity" 22 (22): 351-362, 1977

      6 Higgs, D., "Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors"

      7 Kornai, J., "Resource-Constrained versus Demand-Constrained Systems" 47 (47): 801-819, 1979

      8 Bergh, D. D., "Portfolio Restructuring and Limits to Hierarchical Governance: The Effects of Environmental Uncertainty and Diversification Strategy" 9 (9): 87-102, 1998

      9 Singh, J. V., "Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making" 29 (29): 562-585, 1986

      10 Scott, R., "Organizations, Rational, Natural and Open Systems" Prentice Hall 1988

      1 Penrose, E., "The Theory of the Growth of the Firm" Oxford University Press 1959

      2 Berle, A., "The Modern Corporation and Private Property" Macmillan 1932

      3 Arellano, M., "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations" 58 (58): 277-297, 1991

      4 Daniel, F., "Slack Resources and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis" 57 (57): 565-574, 2004

      5 Moch, M. K., "Review: The Structure of Chaos: Organized Anarchy as a Response to Ambiguity" 22 (22): 351-362, 1977

      6 Higgs, D., "Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors"

      7 Kornai, J., "Resource-Constrained versus Demand-Constrained Systems" 47 (47): 801-819, 1979

      8 Bergh, D. D., "Portfolio Restructuring and Limits to Hierarchical Governance: The Effects of Environmental Uncertainty and Diversification Strategy" 9 (9): 87-102, 1998

      9 Singh, J. V., "Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making" 29 (29): 562-585, 1986

      10 Scott, R., "Organizations, Rational, Natural and Open Systems" Prentice Hall 1988

      11 Cheng, J. L., "Organizational Slack and Response to Environmental Shifts: The Impact of Resource Allocation Patterns" 23 (23): 1-18, 1997

      12 Bourgeois, L. J., "Organizational Slack and Political Behavior among Top Management Teams" 43-47, 1983

      13 Lin, W. T., "Organizational Slack and Firm’s Internationalization: A Longitudinal Study of High-Technology Firms" 44 (44): 397-406, 2009

      14 Bourgeois, L. J., "On the Measurement of Organizational Slack" 6 (6): 43-47, 1981

      15 Mayers, D., "Managerial Discretion, Regulation, and Stock Insurer Ownership Structure" 61 (61): 638-655, 1994

      16 Burkart, M., "Large Shareholder, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm" 112 (112): 693-728, 1997

      17 Nohria, N., "Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?" 39 (39): 1245-1264, 1996

      18 Denis, D. K., "International Corporate Governance" 38 (38): 1-36, 2003

      19 Geroski, P. A., "Innovation, Profitability and Growth Over the Business Cycle" 20 (20): 35-50, 1993

      20 Blundell, R., "Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models" 87 (87): 115-143, 1998

      21 이상훈, "How Financial Slack Affects Firm Performance: Evidence from US Industrial Firms" 경제연구소 16 (16): 1-27, 2011

      22 Wooldridge, J. M., "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data" MIT Press 2002

      23 Toms, S., "Divergence and Convergence within Anglo-American Corporate Governance Systems: Evidence from the US and UK, 1950-2000" 47 (47): 267-295, 2005

      24 Aguilera, R. V., "Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the US" 14 (14): 147-158, 2006

      25 Sharfman, M. P., "Antecedents of Organizational Slack" 13 (13): 601-614, 1988

      26 이상훈, "An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Slack and Firm Performance in British Firms" 포스코경영연구소 10 (10): 177-202, 2010

      27 Williams, C., "An Emerging Third Way? The Erosion of the Anglo-American Shareholder Value Construct" 38 : 493-551, 2005

      28 Jensen, M. C., "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers" 76 (76): 323-329, 1986

      29 Hambrick, D. C., "A Contextual Model of Strategic Decision Making in Organizations" 109-112, 1977

      30 Cyert, R. M., "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm" Prentice Hall 1963

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-06-16 학회명변경 한글명 : 경영대학부속경영연구소 -> 경영연구소
      영문명 : The Institute of management Research, College of Business Administration SNU -> The Institute of management Research, SNU
      KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.13 0.13 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.06 0.716 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼