RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    트루츠 렌토르프의 사회윤리의 근거로서 ‘교회성’에 대한 연구 = The Study of “Kirchlichkeit” as the Basis of Social Ethics by Trutz Rendtorff

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101995514

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis is the study of “kirchlichkeit” as the basis of social ethics by Trutz Rendtorff in the situation of european culture. “Kirchlichkeit” means the reality of god, which god as trinity reveals in the history of religions and in modern culture. Kirchlichkeit is the religious normativity of european culture. This concept is a event of intertextual understanding of religious and historical theology by semler, schleiermacher und of church dogmatics by k. barth. With this concept explains he, that his social ethics comes from hermeneutical theology and refers to the hermeneutical dogmatics and ethics. He tries to explain practical “kirchlichkeit”. What is practical “kirchlichkeit”? First, he regards “Kirchlichkeit” as identity. Man expresses with freedom identity and develops faith community. “Setting in Life” of christian faith is a historical and modern kontext, where church and theology the whole life of christian form. Rendtorff regards interpretation of “Setting in Life” of religious life the task of theology. Second, he defines “Kirchlichkeit” as individuality of christian faith in the european religious history and european culture. Theology is hermeneutics as localization in relation to churches dogmatics by karl barth. Here is church a room, where Gott appears as trinity. The subject of church is not mensch, but god. If god appears in the church, understands christian god as the basis of identity of christian faith. Church is a dogmatic form of freedom in society. Third is “Kirchlichkeit” the basis of social ethics. Because social ethics makes religious society with various forms to social body. It is a matter of political theology. Trutz Rendtorff emphasizes living together, mutual cognition, compromise, dissent care in public life, in order to reach consensus. Rendtorff emphasizes the interpretation of religious text and traditions and dialogue with other religions. This is a meaning of social ethics as perform of life. Finally has social ethics the formation of identity and Kirchlichkeit as task of korean theology. In the political situation of korea must develops the korean theology the method of dialogue between christianity and other religions for social responsibility.
    번역하기

    This thesis is the study of “kirchlichkeit” as the basis of social ethics by Trutz Rendtorff in the situation of european culture. “Kirchlichkeit” means the reality of god, which god as trinity reveals in the history of religions and in modern...

    This thesis is the study of “kirchlichkeit” as the basis of social ethics by Trutz Rendtorff in the situation of european culture. “Kirchlichkeit” means the reality of god, which god as trinity reveals in the history of religions and in modern culture. Kirchlichkeit is the religious normativity of european culture. This concept is a event of intertextual understanding of religious and historical theology by semler, schleiermacher und of church dogmatics by k. barth. With this concept explains he, that his social ethics comes from hermeneutical theology and refers to the hermeneutical dogmatics and ethics. He tries to explain practical “kirchlichkeit”. What is practical “kirchlichkeit”? First, he regards “Kirchlichkeit” as identity. Man expresses with freedom identity and develops faith community. “Setting in Life” of christian faith is a historical and modern kontext, where church and theology the whole life of christian form. Rendtorff regards interpretation of “Setting in Life” of religious life the task of theology. Second, he defines “Kirchlichkeit” as individuality of christian faith in the european religious history and european culture. Theology is hermeneutics as localization in relation to churches dogmatics by karl barth. Here is church a room, where Gott appears as trinity. The subject of church is not mensch, but god. If god appears in the church, understands christian god as the basis of identity of christian faith. Church is a dogmatic form of freedom in society. Third is “Kirchlichkeit” the basis of social ethics. Because social ethics makes religious society with various forms to social body. It is a matter of political theology. Trutz Rendtorff emphasizes living together, mutual cognition, compromise, dissent care in public life, in order to reach consensus. Rendtorff emphasizes the interpretation of religious text and traditions and dialogue with other religions. This is a meaning of social ethics as perform of life. Finally has social ethics the formation of identity and Kirchlichkeit as task of korean theology. In the political situation of korea must develops the korean theology the method of dialogue between christianity and other religions for social responsibility.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis is the study of “kirchlichkeit” as the basis of social ethics by Trutz Rendtorff in the situation of european culture. “Kirchlichkeit” means the reality of god, which god as trinity reveals in the history of religions and in modern culture. Kirchlichkeit is the religious normativity of european culture. This concept is a event of intertextual understanding of religious and historical theology by semler, schleiermacher und of church dogmatics by k. barth. With this concept explains he, that his social ethics comes from hermeneutical theology and refers to the hermeneutical dogmatics and ethics. He tries to explain practical “kirchlichkeit”. What is practical “kirchlichkeit”? First, he regards “Kirchlichkeit” as identity. Man expresses with freedom identity and develops faith community. “Setting in Life” of christian faith is a historical and modern kontext, where church and theology the whole life of christian form. Rendtorff regards interpretation of “Setting in Life” of religious life the task of theology. Second, he defines “Kirchlichkeit” as individuality of christian faith in the european religious history and european culture. Theology is hermeneutics as localization in relation to churches dogmatics by karl barth. Here is church a room, where Gott appears as trinity. The subject of church is not mensch, but god. If god appears in the church, understands christian god as the basis of identity of christian faith. Church is a dogmatic form of freedom in society. Third is “Kirchlichkeit” the basis of social ethics. Because social ethics makes religious society with various forms to social body. It is a matter of political theology. Trutz Rendtorff emphasizes living together, mutual cognition, compromise, dissent care in public life, in order to reach consensus. Rendtorff emphasizes the interpretation of religious text and traditions and dialogue with other religions. This is a meaning of social ethics as perform of life. Finally has social ethics the formation of identity and Kirchlichkeit as task of korean theology. In the political situation of korea must develops the korean theology the method of dialogue between christianity and other religions for social responsibility.
    번역하기

    This thesis is the study of “kirchlichkeit” as the basis of social ethics by Trutz Rendtorff in the situation of european culture. “Kirchlichkeit” means the reality of god, which god as trinity reveals in the history of religions and in modern...

    This thesis is the study of “kirchlichkeit” as the basis of social ethics by Trutz Rendtorff in the situation of european culture. “Kirchlichkeit” means the reality of god, which god as trinity reveals in the history of religions and in modern culture. Kirchlichkeit is the religious normativity of european culture. This concept is a event of intertextual understanding of religious and historical theology by semler, schleiermacher und of church dogmatics by k. barth. With this concept explains he, that his social ethics comes from hermeneutical theology and refers to the hermeneutical dogmatics and ethics. He tries to explain practical “kirchlichkeit”. What is practical “kirchlichkeit”? First, he regards “Kirchlichkeit” as identity. Man expresses with freedom identity and develops faith community. “Setting in Life” of christian faith is a historical and modern kontext, where church and theology the whole life of christian form. Rendtorff regards interpretation of “Setting in Life” of religious life the task of theology. Second, he defines “Kirchlichkeit” as individuality of christian faith in the european religious history and european culture. Theology is hermeneutics as localization in relation to churches dogmatics by karl barth. Here is church a room, where Gott appears as trinity. The subject of church is not mensch, but god. If god appears in the church, understands christian god as the basis of identity of christian faith. Church is a dogmatic form of freedom in society. Third is “Kirchlichkeit” the basis of social ethics. Because social ethics makes religious society with various forms to social body. It is a matter of political theology. Trutz Rendtorff emphasizes living together, mutual cognition, compromise, dissent care in public life, in order to reach consensus. Rendtorff emphasizes the interpretation of religious text and traditions and dialogue with other religions. This is a meaning of social ethics as perform of life. Finally has social ethics the formation of identity and Kirchlichkeit as task of korean theology. In the political situation of korea must develops the korean theology the method of dialogue between christianity and other religions for social responsibility.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 들어가는 말
    • II. 유럽적 종교사에서 드러난 종교적 개별성으로서 ‘교회성’
    • III. 사회학적 몸의 표현으로서 교회: 유럽적 교회성
    • IV. 한국사회를 위한 렌토르프의 ‘교회성’의 의미
    • V. 나오는 말
    • I. 들어가는 말
    • II. 유럽적 종교사에서 드러난 종교적 개별성으로서 ‘교회성’
    • III. 사회학적 몸의 표현으로서 교회: 유럽적 교회성
    • IV. 한국사회를 위한 렌토르프의 ‘교회성’의 의미
    • V. 나오는 말
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이원규, "한국교회의 사회학적 이해" 성서연구사 1992

    2 은준관, "신학적 교회론" 한들출판사 2013

    3 이형기, "성경의 내러티브 신학과 교회의 공적책임" 한들출판사 2010

    4 정종훈, "기독교사회윤리와 인권: 함께 누릴 인권을 지향하는 사회" 대한기독교서회 2003

    5 박충구, "기독교 윤리사" 대한기독교서회 2003

    6 하우어워스, 스탠리, "교회됨(Community of Character)" 북코리아 2010

    7 조승래, "공공성 담론의 지적계보, 자유주의를 넘어서" 서강대학교 출판부 2014

    8 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Vielspaeltiges" Kohlhammer 1991

    9 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Theologie in der Moderne" Gütersloher Verlaghaus 1981

    10 Fischer, Hermann, "Protestantische Theologie im 20. Jahrhundert" Kohlhammer 2002

    1 이원규, "한국교회의 사회학적 이해" 성서연구사 1992

    2 은준관, "신학적 교회론" 한들출판사 2013

    3 이형기, "성경의 내러티브 신학과 교회의 공적책임" 한들출판사 2010

    4 정종훈, "기독교사회윤리와 인권: 함께 누릴 인권을 지향하는 사회" 대한기독교서회 2003

    5 박충구, "기독교 윤리사" 대한기독교서회 2003

    6 하우어워스, 스탠리, "교회됨(Community of Character)" 북코리아 2010

    7 조승래, "공공성 담론의 지적계보, 자유주의를 넘어서" 서강대학교 출판부 2014

    8 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Vielspaeltiges" Kohlhammer 1991

    9 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Theologie in der Moderne" Gütersloher Verlaghaus 1981

    10 Fischer, Hermann, "Protestantische Theologie im 20. Jahrhundert" Kohlhammer 2002

    11 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Kirche und Theologie" Gütersloher Verlaghaus 1966

    12 Lange, Ernst, "Kirche für die Welt" Kaiser 1981

    13 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Glaubenslehre" Scientia Verlag 1981

    14 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Geschichte durch Geschichte überwinden" Gütersloher Verlaghaus 285-326, 2006

    15 Rendtorff, Trutz, "Ethik" Kohlhammer 1990

    16 Troeltsch, Ernst, "Der Historismus und seine Probleme" Scientia Verlag 1977

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.36 0.33 0.816 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼