RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    문단 쓰기 교수ㆍ학습 양상 연구 = A study on Aspects of teaching-learning in the paragraph writing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76490254

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Given the importance of paragraph writing, the confidence level of Elementary students falls behind our expectation. First of all, the diagnostic observation of school classes in which instruction of paragraph writing takes place deems necessary. This investigation, therefore, was to propose directional improvement for paragraph writing class with the analysis of how the students were taught and what was the result.<BR>  In chapter Ⅱ, tendency of research into the teaching of paragraph writing was looked into to build theatrical foundation for this study. And then, three criteria of evaluation for the evaluation of paragraph writing were proposed based on the three principles, form, and key sentence and supporting sentence of paragraph.<BR>  In chapter Ⅲ, paragraph writing related education and the textbooks were examined for analyzed. According to the findings, paragraph writing was taught in single line mode not in spiral mode with very poor contents, and the teaching was set up not in conjunction with other related subjects but in separation from them.<BR>  In the paragraph 2 of chapter Ⅳ, the main theme, how the paragraph writing class of total 6 hours was conducted for two classes of 4th Grade was analyzed and the observed characteristics and differences between the classes were summarized. The common observation between the two classes was that the teaching of the concept of paragraph, key sentence and supporting sentence was mere repetition of the reading in the textbook. And there was no explicit guide on indentation, necessary condition for key sentence with the structural principle of paragraph lacking, and the relative evaluation had no specified criteria. As for the differences, "A" class produced its contents mainly through their question and answer between the teacher and students, but no teaching about paragraph structure took place. On the other hand, in "B" class introductory material closely related to teaching objective was used every time and for that, cooperative group learning was employed. Their assignments were distributed considering their level of performance, thereby making the class more appealing to those who finished earlier than others, and instruction about paragraph was given.<BR>  In paragraph 3 of chapter Ⅳ, the performance result of paragraph writing of the two classes of 4th Grade was analyzed and the characteristics and differences were summarized. The two classes showed in common that the result of their performance lacked in paragraph structure and their sentences were not succinct even though they were able to use key idea for their sentences, especially they lacked in conjunction among other elements of paragraph structure. The differences between the two results of the two classes "A" and "B" showed that there were more students in "B" than in "A" who made proper use of necessary condition for paragraph and the principles of paragraph structure with fewer misconception about the location of key sentence.<BR>  In paragraph 4 of chapter Ⅳ, relation between performance result and how they were taught paragraph writing was looked into from perspectives of teacher"s understanding of the educational contents, teacher"s understanding and application of the textbooks, teaching method and teacher"s scaffolding. Teacher "A" was observed to be teaching paragraph writing the same as appeared in the textbook. So that many writings lacked in the use of key sentence, unity and connection emphasis of its supporting sentences. But teacher "B" used scaffolding to make "adjustment of the level of questions" so that more students in "B" class than in "A" were able to make use of requisite elements of paragraph.<BR>  Paragraph 5 of chapter Ⅳ was to present an improvement for paragraph class based on the analysis. To this end, the importance of paragraph and understanding of paragraph elements s
    번역하기

      Given the importance of paragraph writing, the confidence level of Elementary students falls behind our expectation. First of all, the diagnostic observation of school classes in which instruction of paragraph writing takes place deems nec...

      Given the importance of paragraph writing, the confidence level of Elementary students falls behind our expectation. First of all, the diagnostic observation of school classes in which instruction of paragraph writing takes place deems necessary. This investigation, therefore, was to propose directional improvement for paragraph writing class with the analysis of how the students were taught and what was the result.<BR>  In chapter Ⅱ, tendency of research into the teaching of paragraph writing was looked into to build theatrical foundation for this study. And then, three criteria of evaluation for the evaluation of paragraph writing were proposed based on the three principles, form, and key sentence and supporting sentence of paragraph.<BR>  In chapter Ⅲ, paragraph writing related education and the textbooks were examined for analyzed. According to the findings, paragraph writing was taught in single line mode not in spiral mode with very poor contents, and the teaching was set up not in conjunction with other related subjects but in separation from them.<BR>  In the paragraph 2 of chapter Ⅳ, the main theme, how the paragraph writing class of total 6 hours was conducted for two classes of 4th Grade was analyzed and the observed characteristics and differences between the classes were summarized. The common observation between the two classes was that the teaching of the concept of paragraph, key sentence and supporting sentence was mere repetition of the reading in the textbook. And there was no explicit guide on indentation, necessary condition for key sentence with the structural principle of paragraph lacking, and the relative evaluation had no specified criteria. As for the differences, "A" class produced its contents mainly through their question and answer between the teacher and students, but no teaching about paragraph structure took place. On the other hand, in "B" class introductory material closely related to teaching objective was used every time and for that, cooperative group learning was employed. Their assignments were distributed considering their level of performance, thereby making the class more appealing to those who finished earlier than others, and instruction about paragraph was given.<BR>  In paragraph 3 of chapter Ⅳ, the performance result of paragraph writing of the two classes of 4th Grade was analyzed and the characteristics and differences were summarized. The two classes showed in common that the result of their performance lacked in paragraph structure and their sentences were not succinct even though they were able to use key idea for their sentences, especially they lacked in conjunction among other elements of paragraph structure. The differences between the two results of the two classes "A" and "B" showed that there were more students in "B" than in "A" who made proper use of necessary condition for paragraph and the principles of paragraph structure with fewer misconception about the location of key sentence.<BR>  In paragraph 4 of chapter Ⅳ, relation between performance result and how they were taught paragraph writing was looked into from perspectives of teacher"s understanding of the educational contents, teacher"s understanding and application of the textbooks, teaching method and teacher"s scaffolding. Teacher "A" was observed to be teaching paragraph writing the same as appeared in the textbook. So that many writings lacked in the use of key sentence, unity and connection emphasis of its supporting sentences. But teacher "B" used scaffolding to make "adjustment of the level of questions" so that more students in "B" class than in "A" were able to make use of requisite elements of paragraph.<BR>  Paragraph 5 of chapter Ⅳ was to present an improvement for paragraph class based on the analysis. To this end, the importance of paragraph and understanding of paragraph elements s

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 머리말
      2. 문단 쓰기 교육 내용 및 교과서 분석
      3. 문단 쓰기 교수ㆍ학습 양상 고찰 및 분석
      4. 문단 쓰기 수업의 개선 방향
      5. 맺음말
      참고문헌
      ABSTRACT
    • 1. 머리말
      2. 문단 쓰기 교육 내용 및 교과서 분석
      3. 문단 쓰기 교수ㆍ학습 양상 고찰 및 분석
      4. 문단 쓰기 수업의 개선 방향
      5. 맺음말
      참고문헌
      ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼