RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Comparative Analysis of Amu(N)to and Amu(N)na

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104927069

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The main concern of the paper is to explore an account for the contrasts between amu(N)to and amu(N)na in negation: amu(N)to is compatible with all the types of negation, but amu(N)na cannot occur with lexical negation; amu(N)to and its preceeding constituents cannot be focused in nun-negation, but amu(N)na and its preceeding constituents can; amu(N)to must precede amu(N)na. Based on the position that Korean NPI should be interpreted as a universal quantifier, I suggest their licensing conditions: amu(N)to should ‘immediately c-command’ TP[+neg] and amu(N)na should ‘immediately c-command’ TP[-neg] at LF. I claim that these contrasts follow from their opposite licensing conditions.
    번역하기

    The main concern of the paper is to explore an account for the contrasts between amu(N)to and amu(N)na in negation: amu(N)to is compatible with all the types of negation, but amu(N)na cannot occur with lexical negation; amu(N)to and its preceeding con...

    The main concern of the paper is to explore an account for the contrasts between amu(N)to and amu(N)na in negation: amu(N)to is compatible with all the types of negation, but amu(N)na cannot occur with lexical negation; amu(N)to and its preceeding constituents cannot be focused in nun-negation, but amu(N)na and its preceeding constituents can; amu(N)to must precede amu(N)na. Based on the position that Korean NPI should be interpreted as a universal quantifier, I suggest their licensing conditions: amu(N)to should ‘immediately c-command’ TP[+neg] and amu(N)na should ‘immediately c-command’ TP[-neg] at LF. I claim that these contrasts follow from their opposite licensing conditions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Bobaljik, Jonathan David, "Word Order and Scope: Transparent Interfaces and the 3/4 Signature" 43 (43): 371-421, 2012

    2 Han, Chung-hye, "V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope" 38 (38): 1-47, 2007

    3 Kim, Jong-Bok, "The Grammar of Negation: A Constraint-Based Approach" Stanford University 2000

    4 Choe, Hyon Sook, "Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates: A Transformational Approach" MIT 1988

    5 Carlson, Greg N., "Polarity any is Existential" 11 : 799-804, 1980

    6 Ladusaw, William A., "Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations" The university of Texas at Austin 1979

    7 An, Duk-ho, "On the Distribution of NPIs in Korean" 15 : 317-350, 2007

    8 Song, Seok Choong, "On interpreting the scope of negation in Korean" 18 : 197-215, 1982

    9 Linebarger, Marcia, "Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation" 10 : 325-387, 1987

    10 Sohn, Keun-won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope and Economy" University of Connecticut 1995

    1 Bobaljik, Jonathan David, "Word Order and Scope: Transparent Interfaces and the 3/4 Signature" 43 (43): 371-421, 2012

    2 Han, Chung-hye, "V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope" 38 (38): 1-47, 2007

    3 Kim, Jong-Bok, "The Grammar of Negation: A Constraint-Based Approach" Stanford University 2000

    4 Choe, Hyon Sook, "Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates: A Transformational Approach" MIT 1988

    5 Carlson, Greg N., "Polarity any is Existential" 11 : 799-804, 1980

    6 Ladusaw, William A., "Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations" The university of Texas at Austin 1979

    7 An, Duk-ho, "On the Distribution of NPIs in Korean" 15 : 317-350, 2007

    8 Song, Seok Choong, "On interpreting the scope of negation in Korean" 18 : 197-215, 1982

    9 Linebarger, Marcia, "Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation" 10 : 325-387, 1987

    10 Sohn, Keun-won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope and Economy" University of Connecticut 1995

    11 Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung, "Negation and Object Shift in Early Child Korean, In The Interpretive Tract" MIT 73-86, 1998

    12 Peter Sells, "Korean NPIs Scope over Negation" 언어교육원 42 (42): 71-100, 2006

    13 Chung, Daeho, "Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol 6" CSLI Publications 415-435, 1998

    14 Kim, Ae-ryung, "Japanese/Korean Linguistic, Vol 10" CLSI Publications 587-600, 2002

    15 Suh, Jin-hee, "Harvard Studies in korean Linguistics 3" 527-536, 1989

    16 Sells, Peter, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics. 9" Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University 3-22, 2001

    17 Lee, Young-suk, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 5" Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University 577-592, 1993

    18 Sells, Peter, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 11" Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University 3-22, 2006

    19 Kuno, Susumu, "Description and Explanation in Korean Linguistics" East Asia Program, Cornell University 87-131, 1998

    20 Kim, Kwang-sup, "A Paradox in Korean NPI Licensing" 9 : 403-428, 1999

    21 편일범, "A Note on the Interpretation of Negation Scope" 한국중원언어학회 27 (27): 305-324, 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.39 0.39 0.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.37 0.35 0.712 0.09
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼