RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Icare Rebound Tonometer와 Goldmann 압평 안압계의 비교

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100524526

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: To compare Icare rebound tonometer (IRT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and investigate the clinical usefulness of IRT. Methods: In a retrospective study of 131 eyes with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with IRT and GAT. The correlation between IRT and GAT and the influence of refractive error (spherical equivalent; SE) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were analyzed. Results: A distinct correlation between IRT and GAT was found. IOP measured with GAT was 2.23 ± 3.16 mm Hg higher than with IRT (p < 0.001). As CCT increased, IOP was measured higher with both GAT and IRT. IOP in myopic eyes (SE ≥ -5 diopter) was measured relatively lower than in hyperopic eyes (SE < -5 diopter) with GAT (+1.50 ± 0.68 mm Hg) and IRT (+1.88 ± 0.75 mm Hg). Conclusions: IRT showed strong correlation with GAT, but IOP measured approximately 2 mm Hg lower. The IOP tends to measure lower at low CCT and in myopic eyes.
    번역하기

    Purpose: To compare Icare rebound tonometer (IRT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and investigate the clinical usefulness of IRT. Methods: In a retrospective study of 131 eyes with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect, intraocular pressure (IOP) was...

    Purpose: To compare Icare rebound tonometer (IRT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and investigate the clinical usefulness of IRT. Methods: In a retrospective study of 131 eyes with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with IRT and GAT. The correlation between IRT and GAT and the influence of refractive error (spherical equivalent; SE) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were analyzed. Results: A distinct correlation between IRT and GAT was found. IOP measured with GAT was 2.23 ± 3.16 mm Hg higher than with IRT (p < 0.001). As CCT increased, IOP was measured higher with both GAT and IRT. IOP in myopic eyes (SE ≥ -5 diopter) was measured relatively lower than in hyperopic eyes (SE < -5 diopter) with GAT (+1.50 ± 0.68 mm Hg) and IRT (+1.88 ± 0.75 mm Hg). Conclusions: IRT showed strong correlation with GAT, but IOP measured approximately 2 mm Hg lower. The IOP tends to measure lower at low CCT and in myopic eyes.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 염호엽, "포스펜 안압계의 임상 적용 : 정상인에서 골드만 압평안압계와의 비교" 대한안과학회 46 (46): 676-681, 2005

    2 Scuderi GL, "Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study" 21 : 251-257, 2011

    3 Poostchi A, "The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness" 37 : 687-691, 2009

    4 Sahin A, "Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children" 16 : 185-188, 2007

    5 Muttuvelu DV, "Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry" 90 : 322-326, 2012

    6 Tranchina L, "Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an Air-Puff Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer" 2012

    7 Doughty MJ, "Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach" 44 : 367-408, 2000

    8 Ruokonen PC, "Evaluation of the impedance tonometers TGDc-01 and iCare according to the international ocular tonometer standards ISO 8612" 245 : 1259-1265, 2007

    9 Kotecha A, "Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer" 47 : 5337-5347, 2006

    10 Leiva M, "Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs" 9 : 17-21, 2006

    1 염호엽, "포스펜 안압계의 임상 적용 : 정상인에서 골드만 압평안압계와의 비교" 대한안과학회 46 (46): 676-681, 2005

    2 Scuderi GL, "Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study" 21 : 251-257, 2011

    3 Poostchi A, "The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness" 37 : 687-691, 2009

    4 Sahin A, "Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children" 16 : 185-188, 2007

    5 Muttuvelu DV, "Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry" 90 : 322-326, 2012

    6 Tranchina L, "Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an Air-Puff Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer" 2012

    7 Doughty MJ, "Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach" 44 : 367-408, 2000

    8 Ruokonen PC, "Evaluation of the impedance tonometers TGDc-01 and iCare according to the international ocular tonometer standards ISO 8612" 245 : 1259-1265, 2007

    9 Kotecha A, "Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer" 47 : 5337-5347, 2006

    10 Leiva M, "Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs" 9 : 17-21, 2006

    11 Munkwitz S, "Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range" 246 : 875-879, 2008

    12 Jorge J, "Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population" 30 : 108-112, 2010

    13 Fernandes P, "Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population" 25 : 436-440, 2005

    14 Abraham LM, "Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists" 22 : 503-506, 2008

    15 Salvetat ML, "Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty" 25 : 642-650, 2011

    16 Vandewalle E, "Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma" 19 : 783-789, 2009

    17 Brusini P, "Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients" 15 : 213-217, 2006

    18 Kageyama M, "Comparison of ICare rebound tonometer with noncontact tonometer in healthy children" 20 : 63-66, 2011

    19 이주은, "Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry" 대한안과학회 23 (23): 27-31, 2009

    20 Detry-Morel M, "Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare" 29 : 1119-1127, 2006

    21 Krzyzanowska-Berkowska P, "Clinical evaluation of the ICare tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure" 112 (112): 217-220, 2010

    22 Pakrou N, "Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry" 17 : 43-47, 2008

    23 Yim HB, "Clinical comparision of the pulsair pneumotonometer, oculab tono-pen and Goldmann applanation tonometer" 32 : 364-370, 1991

    24 Song MC, "Clinical comparision of the ProTon and the Goldmann applanation tonometer" 36 : 2188-2194, 1995

    25 García-Resúa C, "Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes" 83 : 102-107, 2006

    26 Diaz A, "Accuracy of the ICare rebound tonometer in glaucomatous eyes with topical ocular hypotensive medication" 28 : 29-34, 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.23 0.23 0.366 0.02
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼