RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      베토벤 피아노 소나타에 나타나는 코다(coda) 처리 기법 = A Study of Beethoven’s Handlings of the Coda as Seen in His Piano Sonatas

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103996733

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Although music scholars have researched a musical form, particularly sonata form for over 200 years, they tended to downplay structural roles of the final formal unit, “coda.” A close inspection of the music dictionaries reflects such a tendency that roles of the coda in the sonata form have been devaluated in comparison to the proceeding sections. However, recent studies from a Schenkerian perspective reveal that the 18th-century standpoint of the coda, in which one understands it simply as a rhetorical appendix to the proceeding main body, experiences a modification and supplementation.
      The goal of this article is to study Beethoven’s unique ways of handlings the coda by examining sonata-form movements from his piano sonatas. For this task, I have reviewed concepts of the coda by Heinrich Schenker, Robert Hopkins, John Rink, etc. and then taken Joseph Kerman’s monumental study as a point of departure for the stylistic analysis of Beethoven’s piano works. I distinguished distinctive functions of the coda in first movements of Op. 2/3, Op. 53, and, Op. 81a, and third movement of Op. 31/2, by espousing critically Kerman’s opinions on distinctive roles of the coda. The analytic result proves that codas of each work carry quite different functions: in Op. 2/3, Beethoven put structural significance into the coda by interpolating it between divided codettas; in Op. 53, the coda serves as strategic place that dissolves accumulative large-scale dissonance; and Op. 81a, and Op. 31/2 take the coda as a peroration containing diverse motivic reworking processes.
      번역하기

      Although music scholars have researched a musical form, particularly sonata form for over 200 years, they tended to downplay structural roles of the final formal unit, “coda.” A close inspection of the music dictionaries reflects such a tendency t...

      Although music scholars have researched a musical form, particularly sonata form for over 200 years, they tended to downplay structural roles of the final formal unit, “coda.” A close inspection of the music dictionaries reflects such a tendency that roles of the coda in the sonata form have been devaluated in comparison to the proceeding sections. However, recent studies from a Schenkerian perspective reveal that the 18th-century standpoint of the coda, in which one understands it simply as a rhetorical appendix to the proceeding main body, experiences a modification and supplementation.
      The goal of this article is to study Beethoven’s unique ways of handlings the coda by examining sonata-form movements from his piano sonatas. For this task, I have reviewed concepts of the coda by Heinrich Schenker, Robert Hopkins, John Rink, etc. and then taken Joseph Kerman’s monumental study as a point of departure for the stylistic analysis of Beethoven’s piano works. I distinguished distinctive functions of the coda in first movements of Op. 2/3, Op. 53, and, Op. 81a, and third movement of Op. 31/2, by espousing critically Kerman’s opinions on distinctive roles of the coda. The analytic result proves that codas of each work carry quite different functions: in Op. 2/3, Beethoven put structural significance into the coda by interpolating it between divided codettas; in Op. 53, the coda serves as strategic place that dissolves accumulative large-scale dissonance; and Op. 81a, and Op. 31/2 take the coda as a peroration containing diverse motivic reworking processes.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Although music scholars have researched a musical form, particularly sonata form for over 200 years, they tended to downplay structural roles of the final formal unit, “coda.” A close inspection of the music dictionaries reflects such a tendency that roles of the coda in the sonata form have been devaluated in comparison to the proceeding sections. However, recent studies from a Schenkerian perspective reveal that the 18th-century standpoint of the coda, in which one understands it simply as a rhetorical appendix to the proceeding main body, experiences a modification and supplementation.
      The goal of this article is to study Beethoven’s unique ways of handlings the coda by examining sonata-form movements from his piano sonatas. For this task, I have reviewed concepts of the coda by Heinrich Schenker, Robert Hopkins, John Rink, etc. and then taken Joseph Kerman’s monumental study as a point of departure for the stylistic analysis of Beethoven’s piano works. I distinguished distinctive functions of the coda in first movements of Op. 2/3, Op. 53, and, Op. 81a, and third movement of Op. 31/2, by espousing critically Kerman’s opinions on distinctive roles of the coda. The analytic result proves that codas of each work carry quite different functions: in Op. 2/3, Beethoven put structural significance into the coda by interpolating it between divided codettas; in Op. 53, the coda serves as strategic place that dissolves accumulative large-scale dissonance; and Op. 81a, and Op. 31/2 take the coda as a peroration containing diverse motivic reworking processes.
      번역하기

      Although music scholars have researched a musical form, particularly sonata form for over 200 years, they tended to downplay structural roles of the final formal unit, “coda.” A close inspection of the music dictionaries reflects such a tendency t...

      Although music scholars have researched a musical form, particularly sonata form for over 200 years, they tended to downplay structural roles of the final formal unit, “coda.” A close inspection of the music dictionaries reflects such a tendency that roles of the coda in the sonata form have been devaluated in comparison to the proceeding sections. However, recent studies from a Schenkerian perspective reveal that the 18th-century standpoint of the coda, in which one understands it simply as a rhetorical appendix to the proceeding main body, experiences a modification and supplementation.
      The goal of this article is to study Beethoven’s unique ways of handlings the coda by examining sonata-form movements from his piano sonatas. For this task, I have reviewed concepts of the coda by Heinrich Schenker, Robert Hopkins, John Rink, etc. and then taken Joseph Kerman’s monumental study as a point of departure for the stylistic analysis of Beethoven’s piano works. I distinguished distinctive functions of the coda in first movements of Op. 2/3, Op. 53, and, Op. 81a, and third movement of Op. 31/2, by espousing critically Kerman’s opinions on distinctive roles of the coda. The analytic result proves that codas of each work carry quite different functions: in Op. 2/3, Beethoven put structural significance into the coda by interpolating it between divided codettas; in Op. 53, the coda serves as strategic place that dissolves accumulative large-scale dissonance; and Op. 81a, and Op. 31/2 take the coda as a peroration containing diverse motivic reworking processes.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송무경, "조성음악의 분석이론. 음악이론과 분석" 심설당 55-92, 2005

      2 송무경, "음악분석의 즐거움과 효용 : 베토벤 피아노 소나타 op31/2 <폭풍> 1악장에 대한 두 가지 이야기 분석" 한국서양음악학회 8 (8): 9-36, 2005

      3 이희승, "국어대사전" 민중서림 1994

      4 Hopkins, Robert, "When a Coda is More Than a Coda: Reflections on Beethoven. In Explorations in Music, the Arts, and Ideas: Essays in Honor of Leonard B. Meyer" Pendragon 393-410, 1988

      5 Spitzer, Michael, "The Significance of Recapitulation in the ‘Waldstein Sonata" 5 : 103-117, 1996

      6 Song, Moo Kyoung, "The Evolution of Sonata-Form Design in Ludwig van Beethoven’s Early Piano Sonatas, WoO 47 to Opus 22" The University of Texas at Austin 2002

      7 Caplin, William, "The Classical Cadence: Conceptions and Misconceptions" 57 (57): 51-117, 2004

      8 Rink, John, "Structural Momentum’ and Closure in Chopin's Nocturne Op. 9, No. 2. In Schenker Studies" Cambridge University Press 1999

      9 Rosen, Charles, "Sonata Forms. 다양한 소나타 형식" 수문당 1995

      10 Webster, James, "Sonata Form. In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians" Grove’s Dictionaries Inc. 687-698, 2001

      1 송무경, "조성음악의 분석이론. 음악이론과 분석" 심설당 55-92, 2005

      2 송무경, "음악분석의 즐거움과 효용 : 베토벤 피아노 소나타 op31/2 <폭풍> 1악장에 대한 두 가지 이야기 분석" 한국서양음악학회 8 (8): 9-36, 2005

      3 이희승, "국어대사전" 민중서림 1994

      4 Hopkins, Robert, "When a Coda is More Than a Coda: Reflections on Beethoven. In Explorations in Music, the Arts, and Ideas: Essays in Honor of Leonard B. Meyer" Pendragon 393-410, 1988

      5 Spitzer, Michael, "The Significance of Recapitulation in the ‘Waldstein Sonata" 5 : 103-117, 1996

      6 Song, Moo Kyoung, "The Evolution of Sonata-Form Design in Ludwig van Beethoven’s Early Piano Sonatas, WoO 47 to Opus 22" The University of Texas at Austin 2002

      7 Caplin, William, "The Classical Cadence: Conceptions and Misconceptions" 57 (57): 51-117, 2004

      8 Rink, John, "Structural Momentum’ and Closure in Chopin's Nocturne Op. 9, No. 2. In Schenker Studies" Cambridge University Press 1999

      9 Rosen, Charles, "Sonata Forms. 다양한 소나타 형식" 수문당 1995

      10 Webster, James, "Sonata Form. In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians" Grove’s Dictionaries Inc. 687-698, 2001

      11 Plantinga, Leon, "Romantic Music: A History of Musical Style in Nineteenth-Century Europe" W. W. Norton & Company Inc. 1984

      12 Schenker, Heinrich, "Organic Structure in Sonata Form. In Readings in Schenker Analysis and Other Approaches" Yale 38-53, 1977

      13 Kerman, Joseph, "Notes on Beethoven’s Codas, in Beethoven Studies" Cambridge University Press 141-159, 1982

      14 Dahlhaus, Carl, "Nineteenth-Century Music" University of California Press 1989

      15 Cavett-Dunsby, Esther, "Mozart's Codas" 7 (7): 31-51, 1988

      16 Ratner, Leonard, "Key Definition-A Structural Issue in Beethoven’s Music" 23 (23): 472-483, 1970

      17 LaRue, Jan, "Guidelines for Style Analysis" Harmonie Park Press 1992

      18 Schenker, Heinrich, "Free Composition" Longman 1979

      19 Green, Douglass, "Form in Tonal Music. 조성음악의 형식" 수문당 1998

      20 Janet Schmalfeldt, "Form as the Process of Becoming: The Beethoven-Hegelian Tradition and the ‘Tempest’ Sonata" 4 : 37-71, 1995

      21 Chodkowski, Andrzej, "Die Koda in der Sonatenform Beethovens. Bericht uber den Internationalen Beethoven-Kongress" 1973

      22 Smyth, David, "Codas in Classical Form: Aspects of Large-Scale Rhythm and Pattern Completion" University of Texas at Austin 1985

      23 Randel, Don, "Coda. In The New Harvard Dictionary of Music" 178-, 1986

      24 Bullivant, Roger, "Coda. In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians" Grove’s Dictionaries Inc. 82-, 2001

      25 Rosen, Charles, "Classical Style: Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven" Norton 1997

      26 Caplin, William, "Classical Form: A Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven" Oxford University Press 1998

      27 Kinderman, William, "Beethoven" University of California Press 1995

      28 Kamien, Roger, "Aspects of the Recapitulation in Beethoven Piano Sonatas" 4 : 195-235, 1976

      29 Dahlhaus, Carl, "Approach to His Music" Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press 1991

      30 Tovey, Donald F, "A Companion to Beethoven’s Pianoforte Sonatas: Bar-by-Bar Analysis" Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music 1931

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.2 0.2 0.3
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.29 0.22 0.843 0.39
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼