토지공용제한과 손실보상 = The Restriction of Land Utilization for Public Welfare and Loss Compensation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the Democratic and Capitalistic Society, the Right of Property is supposed to be protective, but it could be limited through the lawful contents and process under the purpose of Public Welfare. For the purpose like this, under our unique historical background and experiences, the restriction of land utilization has formed and improved in the flow of "First is Public Welfare, Second Private Right of Property".
Also as Korean restriction of land utilization has had the character of Public Law depended on the strong government-centered power, when the interpretation of "Public Welfare", that is the core in the restriction of land utilization, is needed, national needs have been considered as Public Welfare.
If we consider only Article 23, the Constitution, unlike in Germany and United States, Korean Constitution seems to guarantee the Right of Property even wider because it is stipulated that the infringement's range, that must be compensated, about the Right of Property includes the use or the restriction as well as the general expropriation.
In fact, however, the Restriction, although there is no concrete compensation provision, is enforced because it is just thought as the reasonable obligation like in the Restriction of land utilization by Act of the Planning and Utilization of the National Territory.
Recently, the Constitutional court has decided that, if the Restriction on the Right of Property exceeds the simple social restriction, the expropriation effect must be admitted. This is a big step in point of the balance and the harmony between the Protection of Private Right of Property and Public Welfare. There are still many things to be done.
In this paper, I will suggest some alternative plans on the balance between the Right of Property on Constitution and the Restriction of Land Utilization for Public Welfare.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 재산권 보장과 제한
• Ⅲ. 토지이용규제
• Ⅳ. 토지공용제한과 정당보상
• Ⅴ. 결 론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장태주, "행정법개론" 현암사 2006

2 김지엽, "토지이용규제에 대한 한국과 미국의 비교 연구- 헌법의 재산권 보장 관점을 중심으로-" 대한국토·도시계획학회 42 (42): 7-28, 2007

3 정회근, "토지소유권제한과 손실보상" 20 : 2003

4 김상용, "토지소유권과 법사상" 민음사 1995

5 서원우, "토지공개념에 관한 공법적 검토" (5) : 1989

6 강경근, "재건축사업에 따른 재산권의 제한과 사회적 기속성" 7 (7): 2006

7 이선영, "신토지수용과 보상법론" 리북스 2005

8 류해웅, "신수용보상법론" 부연사 2005

9 김기재, "손실보상의 판단에 관한 소고" 26 : 2005

10 석종현, "손실보상법론" 삼영사 2005

11 강운산, "미국 연방헌법상 규제적 수용 법리에 관한 연구" 3 : 2006

12 김종보, "도시계획시설의 법적 의미" 25 : 1997

13 허강무, "도시계획시설사업과 재정분권" 32 : 2004

14 김남욱, "공법상의 매수청구권 제도" 32 (32): 2004

15 김병록, "개발제한구역제도의 헌법적 조명" 10 : 2000

16 김재호, "개발제한구역의 지정과 행정상 손실보상" 4 : 1997

17 今村成和, "損失補償制度の硏究" 有斐閣 1968

18 小高 剛, "公用制限と損失補償" 28 (28): 1982

19 原田尙彦, "公用制限 における補償基準" , (29) : 1967

20 J.W.Harris, "Property and Justice" Clarendon Press 1996