RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    신제도주의 조직이론의 과제와 전망: 제도적 디커플링(Institutional Decoupling) 연구를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103351199

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study focuses on the concept of institutional decoupling and critically examines whether and how it contributes to the conceptual and contextual extension of neo-institutional approaches to organization studies. A general premise of neo-institutionalism is that organizations adopt formal policies, practices, and structures, not because there is strong empirical evidence that they improve organizational performance, but because they have become so-cially accepted as appropriate, desirable, or proper. However, scholars have noted that formal adoption does not necessarily lead to actual implementation as a result of two conflicting forces: the generalized institutional pressures to require formal adoption and the organization-specific technical demands to avoid operative inefficiency associated with the adoption. In this paper, we review and critique recent studies guided by the concept of institutional decoupling and show that it has great potential not only for promoting theoretical novelty but also for facilitating productive dialogue between neighboring para-digms in organization studies. We also point to a recent increase in the number of conceptual and empirical studies as well as the diversity of such studies in terms of empirical contexts. Yet our review suggests that the concept of institutional decoupling has been over-extended in some studies, leading to theoretical ambiguity and misinterpretation. We conclude our review by examin-ing critical issues to resolve conceptual over-extension and providing several avenues for future research.
    번역하기

    This study focuses on the concept of institutional decoupling and critically examines whether and how it contributes to the conceptual and contextual extension of neo-institutional approaches to organization studies. A general premise of neo-instituti...

    This study focuses on the concept of institutional decoupling and critically examines whether and how it contributes to the conceptual and contextual extension of neo-institutional approaches to organization studies. A general premise of neo-institutionalism is that organizations adopt formal policies, practices, and structures, not because there is strong empirical evidence that they improve organizational performance, but because they have become so-cially accepted as appropriate, desirable, or proper. However, scholars have noted that formal adoption does not necessarily lead to actual implementation as a result of two conflicting forces: the generalized institutional pressures to require formal adoption and the organization-specific technical demands to avoid operative inefficiency associated with the adoption. In this paper, we review and critique recent studies guided by the concept of institutional decoupling and show that it has great potential not only for promoting theoretical novelty but also for facilitating productive dialogue between neighboring para-digms in organization studies. We also point to a recent increase in the number of conceptual and empirical studies as well as the diversity of such studies in terms of empirical contexts. Yet our review suggests that the concept of institutional decoupling has been over-extended in some studies, leading to theoretical ambiguity and misinterpretation. We conclude our review by examin-ing critical issues to resolve conceptual over-extension and providing several avenues for future research.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이무원, "편집위원장 서언: 한국의 조직이론 연구 어떻게 나아갈 것인가?" 한국인사조직학회 24 (24): 1-7, 2016

    2 정명호, "편집위원장 서언: 탁월한 이론을 찾아서" 한국인사조직학회 24 (24): 1-7, 2016

    3 김영규, "질문한다, 조직학습" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 33-60, 2015

    4 이무원, "조직학습이론(Organizational Learning Theory)의 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 11-32, 2015

    5 조선미, "제도의 채택과 디커플링(Decoupling) 정도에 영향을 미치는 조직의 특성 : 기업의 경력개발제도 사례" 한국인사조직학회 19 (19): 253-297, 2011

    6 MacLean, T., "When organizations don’t walk their talk: A cross-level examination of how decoupling formal ethics programs affects organizational members" 128 (128): 351-368, 2015

    7 Delmas, M. A., "Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation" 31 (31): 575-601, 2010

    8 Terlaak, A., "Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes" 33 (33): 846-868, 2008

    9 Colquitt, J. A., "Trends in theory building and theory testing:A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal" 50 (50): 1281-1303, 2007

    10 Ocasio, W., "Towards an attention-based view of the firm" 18 (18): 187-206, 1997

    1 이무원, "편집위원장 서언: 한국의 조직이론 연구 어떻게 나아갈 것인가?" 한국인사조직학회 24 (24): 1-7, 2016

    2 정명호, "편집위원장 서언: 탁월한 이론을 찾아서" 한국인사조직학회 24 (24): 1-7, 2016

    3 김영규, "질문한다, 조직학습" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 33-60, 2015

    4 이무원, "조직학습이론(Organizational Learning Theory)의 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 11-32, 2015

    5 조선미, "제도의 채택과 디커플링(Decoupling) 정도에 영향을 미치는 조직의 특성 : 기업의 경력개발제도 사례" 한국인사조직학회 19 (19): 253-297, 2011

    6 MacLean, T., "When organizations don’t walk their talk: A cross-level examination of how decoupling formal ethics programs affects organizational members" 128 (128): 351-368, 2015

    7 Delmas, M. A., "Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation" 31 (31): 575-601, 2010

    8 Terlaak, A., "Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes" 33 (33): 846-868, 2008

    9 Colquitt, J. A., "Trends in theory building and theory testing:A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal" 50 (50): 1281-1303, 2007

    10 Ocasio, W., "Towards an attention-based view of the firm" 18 (18): 187-206, 1997

    11 Sine, W. D., "Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector" 54 (54): 123-155, 2009

    12 Jensen, M. C, "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure" 3 (3): 305-360, 1976

    13 Sutton, J. R., "The two faces of governance: Responses to legal uncertainty in U.S. firms, 1955 to 1985" 61 (61): 794-814, 1996

    14 Fiss, P. C., "The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling" 49 (49): 1173-1193, 2006

    15 Westphal, J. D., "The symbolic management of stockholders:Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions" 43 (43): 127-153, 1998

    16 Dobbin, F., "The strength of a weak state: The rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions 1" 104 (104): 441-476, 1998

    17 King, A. A., "The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard" 48 (48): 1091-1106, 2005

    18 Mizruchi, M. S., "The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism" 44 (44): 653-683, 1999

    19 Zajac, E. J., "The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions" 69 (69): 433-457, 2004

    20 Bansal, P., "The oxford handbook of business and the natural environment" Oxford University Press 2012

    21 Powell, W. W., "The new institutionalism in organizational analysis" University of Chicago Press 1991

    22 Edelman, L. B., "The legal environments of organizations" 23 (23): 479-515, 1997

    23 DiMaggio, P. J., "The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields" 48 (48): 147-160, 1983

    24 Thornton, P. H., "The institutional logics perspective:A new approach to culture, structure, and process" Oxford University Press 2012

    25 Tolbert, P. S., "The handbook of organization studies" Sage 175-190, 1996

    26 Crilly, D., "The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation" 59 (59): 705-729, 2016

    27 Provan, K. G., "The federation as an interorganizational linkage network" 8 (8): 79-89, 1983

    28 Schultz, F., "The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view" 115 (115): 681-692, 2013

    29 Oliver, C., "The antecedents of deinstitutionalization" 13 (13): 563-588, 1992

    30 Scott, W. R., "The adolescence of institutional theory" 32 (32): 493-511, 1987

    31 Yoon, J., "Supervisor support in the work place: Legitimacy and positive affectivity" 140 (140): 295-316, 2000

    32 Westphal, J. D., "Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term Incentive Plans" 39 (39): 367-390, 1994

    33 Heusinkveld, S., "Stretching concepts: The role of competing pressures and decoupling in the evolution of organization concepts" 34 (34): 7-32, 2013

    34 Carlos, W. C., "Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic" 2017

    35 Oliver, C., "Strategic responses to institutional processes" 16 (16): 145-179, 1991

    36 Hill, C. W., "Stakeholderagency theory" 29 (29): 131-154, 1992

    37 Hirsch, P. M., "Sociology without social structure: Neo-institutional theory meets brave new world" 102 (102): 1702-1723, 1997

    38 Manning, P. K., "Semiotics and loosely coupled organizations" 1979

    39 Heese, J., "Selective regulator decoupling and organizations’strategic responses" 59 (59): 2178-2204, 2016

    40 Marquis, C., "Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure:A global study of greenwashing" 27 (27): 483-504, 2016

    41 Kodeih, F., "Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity" 35 (35): 7-39, 2014

    42 Park, S., "Professions, organizations, and institutions:Tenure systems in colleges and universities" 38 (38): 340-371, 2011

    43 Weber, K., "Policy as myth and ceremony? The global spread of stock exchanges, 1980-2005" 52 (52): 1319-1347, 2009

    44 Townsend, D. M., "Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures" 32 (32): 685-700, 2008

    45 Shin, T., "Pay for talk: How the use of shareholder-value language affects CEO compensation" 54 (54): 88-117, 2017

    46 Scott, W. R., "Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives" Prentice Hall 2006

    47 Delmas, M. A., "Organizational responses to environmental demands:Opening the black box" 29 (29): 1027-1055, 2008

    48 Huber, G. P., "Organizational learning:The contributing processes and the literatures" 2 (2): 88-115, 1991

    49 Levitt, B., "Organizational learning" 14 (14): 319-338, 1988

    50 Goodrick, E., "Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean births" 41 (41): 1-28, 1996

    51 Terlaak, A., "Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors" 32 (32): 968-985, 2007

    52 Besharov, M. L., "Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications" 39 (39): 364-381, 2014

    53 Haunschild, P. R., "Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty" 42 (42): 472-500, 1997

    54 Wijen, F., "Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption" 39 (39): 302-323, 2014

    55 Suchman, M. C., "Managing legitimacy:Strategic and institutional approaches" 20 (20): 571-610, 1995

    56 Baum, J. A., "Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions" 45 (45): 766-801, 2000

    57 Short, J. L., "Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic:The critical role of the legal environment" 55 (55): 361-396, 2010

    58 Ansari, S. M., "Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse" 35 (35): 67-92, 2010

    59 Hiatt, S. R., "Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms" 56 (56): 923-944, 2013

    60 Orton, J. D., "Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization" 15 (15): 203-223, 1990

    61 Edelman, L. B., "Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace" 95 (95): 1401-1440, 1990

    62 Edelman, L. B., "Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law" 97 (97): 1531-1576, 1992

    63 March, J. G., "Learning from samples of one or fewer" 2 (2): 1-13, 1991

    64 Haack, P., "Is decoupling becoming decoupled from institutional theory? A commentary on Wijen" 40 (40): 307-310, 2014

    65 Scott, W. R., "Institutions and organizations" Sage 1995

    66 Meyer, J. W., "Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony" 83 (83): 340-363, 1977

    67 Kennedy, M. T., "Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals" 52 (52): 897-918, 2009

    68 Selznick, P., "Institutionalism 'old' and 'new'" 41 (41): 270-277, 1996

    69 Kostova, T., "Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions" 33 (33): 994-1006, 2008

    70 Zucker, L. G., "Institutional theories of organization" 13 (13): 443-464, 1987

    71 Tolbert, P. S., "Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935" 28 (28): 22-39, 1983

    72 Goodstein, J. D., "Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues" 37 (37): 350-382, 1994

    73 DiMaggio, P. J., "Institutional patterns and organizations:Culture and environment" Ballinger 3-22, 1988

    74 Frumkin, P., "Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations" 14 (14): 283-307, 2004

    75 Scott, W. R., "Institutional environments and organizations:Structural complexity and individualism" Sage 1994

    76 Greenwood, R., "Institutional complexity and organizational responses" 5 (5): 317-371, 2011

    77 Pache, A. C., "Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics" 56 (56): 972-1001, 2013

    78 Fanelli, A., "In charisma we trust: The effects of CEO charismatic visions on securities analysts" 20 (20): 1011-1033, 2009

    79 Powell, W. W., "Handbook of organizational institutionalism" Sage 276-298, 2008

    80 Boxenbaum, E., "Handbook of organizational institutionalism" Sage 78-98, 2008

    81 Kim, E. H., "Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure" 26 (26): 705-723, 2014

    82 Guler, I., "Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices:The international spread of ISO 9000quality certificates" 47 (47): 207-232, 2002

    83 Bromley, P., "From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk:Decoupling in the contemporary world" 6 (6): 483-530, 2012

    84 Crilly, D., "Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures" 55 (55): 1429-1448, 2012

    85 Kraatz, M. S., "Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change" 61 (61): 812-836, 1996

    86 Marano, V., "Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises" 48 (48): 386-408, 2017

    87 Ashworth, R., "Escape from the iron cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector" 19 (19): 165-187, 2007

    88 Hirsch, P. M., "Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of 'old' and 'new' institutionalisms" 40 (40): 406-418, 1997

    89 Weick, K. E., "Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems" 21 (21): 1-19, 1976

    90 Westphal, J. D., "Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs" 46 (46): 202-228, 2001

    91 Westphal, J. D., "Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption" 42 (42): 366-394, 1997

    92 Marquis, C., "Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance?" 25 (25): 127-148, 2013

    93 Ginsberg, A., "Converting to for-profit status: Corporate responsiveness to radical change" 33 (33): 445-477, 1990

    94 York, J. G., "Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field" 59 (59): 579-610, 2016

    95 Santos, F. M., "Constructing markets and shaping boundaries:Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields" 52 (52): 643-671, 2009

    96 George, E., "Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective" 31 (31): 347-365, 2006

    97 Davis, G. F., "Celebrating organization theory: The after-party" 52 (52): 309-319, 2015

    98 Lounsbury, M., "Celebrating organization theory" 52 (52): 288-308, 2015

    99 Christensen, L. T., "CSR as aspirational talk" 20 (20): 372-393, 2013

    100 Battilana, J., "Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations" 53 (53): 1419-1440, 2010

    101 Tracey, P., "Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model" 22 (22): 60-80, 2011

    102 Keidel, R. W., "Baseball, football, and basketball: Models for business" 12 (12): 4-18, 1984

    103 Mezias, S. J., "An institutional model of organizational practice: Financial reporting at the Fortune 200" 35 (35): 431-457, 1990

    104 Fama, E. F., "Agency problems and the theory of the firm" 88 (88): 288-307, 1980

    105 Jensen, M. C., "Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers" 76 (76): 323-329, 1986

    106 Kostova, T., "Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects" 45 (45): 215-233, 2002

    107 Hart, S., "A natural resource-based view of the firm" 20 (20): 986-1014, 1995

    108 Delmas, M. A., "A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary agreements" 43 (43): 44-63, 2001

    109 Cyert, R. M., "A behavioral theory of the firm" Sage 1963

    110 Barley, S. R., "60th anniversary essay ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out" 61 (61): 1-8, 2016

    111 신동엽, "21세기 매니지먼트 이론의 뉴패러다임" 위즈덤하우스 26-93, 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-02-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 KCI등재
    2013-02-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-07-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.29 1.29 1.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.995 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼