RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    The relations among supervisory working alliance, role difficulties, and supervision satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104230127

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study compared 149 US and 168 South Korea supervisees’ perceptions of the clinical supervision relationship to find out the cultural differences between two countries. Specifically, the relations among the three elements of the supervisory working alliance (emotional bond, agreement on goals, and agreement on tasks) with role difficulties and supervision satisfaction were examined. A few differences in clinical supervision were observed between the two countries. The correlations between the three supervisory working alliance elements and satisfaction with supervision were stronger for US than South Korea supervisees. The supervisory working alliance was significantly related to role difficulties and supervision satisfaction in both countries. Implications for theory, research, and practice were discussed.
    번역하기

    This study compared 149 US and 168 South Korea supervisees’ perceptions of the clinical supervision relationship to find out the cultural differences between two countries. Specifically, the relations among the three elements of the supervisory work...

    This study compared 149 US and 168 South Korea supervisees’ perceptions of the clinical supervision relationship to find out the cultural differences between two countries. Specifically, the relations among the three elements of the supervisory working alliance (emotional bond, agreement on goals, and agreement on tasks) with role difficulties and supervision satisfaction were examined. A few differences in clinical supervision were observed between the two countries. The correlations between the three supervisory working alliance elements and satisfaction with supervision were stronger for US than South Korea supervisees. The supervisory working alliance was significantly related to role difficulties and supervision satisfaction in both countries. Implications for theory, research, and practice were discussed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Cook, D. A., "Visible racial/ethnic group supervisees’ satisfaction with cross-cultural supervision as predicted by relationship characteristics" 35 : 268-274, 1988

    2 Messick, S., "Validity of psychological assessment" 50 : 741-749, 1995

    3 Luborsky, L., "Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy: A counting signs vs. a global rating method" 171 : 480-491, 1983

    4 Meier, S. T., "Trends in reporting psychometric properties of scales used in counseling psychology research" 37 : 113-115, 1990

    5 Werner, O., "Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering, In A handbook of methods in cultural anthropology" American Museum of Natural History 1970

    6 Olk, M. E, "Trainees’ experience of role conflictrole ambiguity in supervisory relationship" 39 : 389-397, 1992

    7 Ellis, M. V., "The unificationist perspective: A context for validity" 69 : 561-563, 1991

    8 Ladany, N., "The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction" 77 : 447-455, 1999

    9 Triandis, H. C., "The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts" 3 : 506-520, 1989

    10 Vander Kolk, C. J., "The relationship of personality, values, and race to anticipation of the supervisory relationship" 18 : 41-46, 1974

    1 Cook, D. A., "Visible racial/ethnic group supervisees’ satisfaction with cross-cultural supervision as predicted by relationship characteristics" 35 : 268-274, 1988

    2 Messick, S., "Validity of psychological assessment" 50 : 741-749, 1995

    3 Luborsky, L., "Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy: A counting signs vs. a global rating method" 171 : 480-491, 1983

    4 Meier, S. T., "Trends in reporting psychometric properties of scales used in counseling psychology research" 37 : 113-115, 1990

    5 Werner, O., "Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering, In A handbook of methods in cultural anthropology" American Museum of Natural History 1970

    6 Olk, M. E, "Trainees’ experience of role conflictrole ambiguity in supervisory relationship" 39 : 389-397, 1992

    7 Ellis, M. V., "The unificationist perspective: A context for validity" 69 : 561-563, 1991

    8 Ladany, N., "The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction" 77 : 447-455, 1999

    9 Triandis, H. C., "The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts" 3 : 506-520, 1989

    10 Vander Kolk, C. J., "The relationship of personality, values, and race to anticipation of the supervisory relationship" 18 : 41-46, 1974

    11 Ladany, N., "The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity" 34 : 220-231, 1995

    12 Ladany, N., "The influence of supervisory racial identity interaction and racial matching on the supervisory working alliance and supervisee multicultural competence" 36 : 284-304, 1997

    13 Bordin, E. S., "The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance" 16 : 252-260, 1979

    14 Hilton, D. B., "The effects of supervisor’s race and level of support on perceptions of supervision" 73 : 559-563, 1995

    15 Ladany, N., "The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance" 38 : 161-176, 1999

    16 Kim, S., "The analyses method of Likert scale data including response bias" 5 : 107-116, 1994

    17 Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.)" Erlbaum 1988

    18 Wilkinson, L., "Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations" 54 : 594-604, 1999

    19 Glass, G. V., "Statistical methods in education and psychology" Prentice-Hall 1970

    20 Bahrick, A. S, "Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory working alliance" 51 : 1484B-, 1990

    21 Oyserman, D., "Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses" 128 : 3-72, 2002

    22 Patton, M. J., "Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training" 44 : 108-115, 1997

    23 Chen, E. C., "Relations of complementarity and supervisory issues to supervisory working alliance: A comparative analysis of two cases" 47 : 485-497, 2000

    24 Horvath, A. O., "Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis" 38 : 139-149, 1991

    25 Tan, S., "Psychotherapy with members of Asian American churches and spiritual traditions, In Handbook of psychotherapy and religious diversity" American Psychological Association 421-444, 2000

    26 Ladany, N., "Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction" 27 : 443-475, 1999

    27 Joo, E., "Psychotherapeutic relationship in different cultures" 1994

    28 Morgan, R., "Predicting the outcomes of psychotherapy by the Penn Helping Alliance Rating Method" 39 : 397-402, 1982

    29 Krause, A. A., "Perceptions of counselor supervision: An examination of Stoltenberg’s model from the perspectives of supervisor and supervisee" 35 : 77-80, 1988

    30 Holloway, E. L., "Patterns of verbal behavior and judgments of satisfaction in the supervision interview" 30 : 227-234, 1983

    31 Haj-Yahia, M. M, "On the encounter between Jewish supervisors and Arab supervisees in Israel" 18 : 17-37, 1999

    32 Puri, M. L., "Nonparametric methods in multivariate analysis" Wiley 1971

    33 Ramos-Sάnchez, L., "Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance" 33 : 197-202, 2002

    34 Huberty, C. J., "Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses" 105 : 302-308, 1989

    35 Haase, R. F., "Multiple criteria for evaluating the magnitude of experimental effects" 36 : 511-516, 1989

    36 Efstation, J. F., "Measuring the working alliance in counseling supervision" 37 : 322-329, 1990

    37 Yuen, K. W., "International and American student’s expectations about counseling" 28 : 66-69, 1981

    38 Tracey, T. J. G., "Integration of theory, research design, measurement, and statistics: Toward a reasoned argument" 27 : 299-324, 1999

    39 Ellis, M. V., "Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: A integrative review, In Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision" John Willey & Sons 447-507, 1997

    40 Yoo, S., "Individualism-collectivism and tolerance of stigma associated with help seeking" 12 : 19-32, 2000

    41 Holland, B. S., "Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures" 104 : 145-149, 1988

    42 Wampold, B. E., "Hypothesis validity of clinical research" 58 : 360-367, 1990

    43 Bernard, J. M., "Fundamentals of clinical supervision" Allyn & Bacon 2004

    44 Gatmon, D., "Exploring ethnic, gender, and sexual orientation variables in supervision: Do they really matter?" 29 : 102-113, 2001

    45 Worthen, V. E., "Enhancing supervision relationship" 2003

    46 Holloway, E. L., "Dimensions of satisfaction in the supervision interview" 1984

    47 Killian, K. D., "Differences making a difference: Cross-cultural interactions in supervisory relationships" 12 : 61-103, 2001

    48 Horvath, A. O., "Development and validation of thealliance inventory" 36 : 223-233, 1986

    49 Ellis, M. V., "Developing and using educational and psychological tests and measures: The unificationist perspective" 69 : 550-555, 1991

    50 Carter, J. W., "Cultural differences in alliance formation during group supervision" 2000

    51 McRoy, R. G., "Cross cultural field supervision: Implications for social work education" 22 : 50-56, 1986

    52 Moskowitz, S. A., "Conflict resolution within therelationship" 14 : 632-641, 1983

    53 Holloway, E. L., "Clinical supervision: A systems approach" Sage 1995

    54 Magnuson, S., "Clinical supervision of prelicensed counselors: Recommendation for consideration and practice" 22 : 176-188, 2000

    55 Fagley, N. S., "Applied statistical power analysis and the interpretation of nonsignificant results by research consumers" 32 : 391-396, 1985

    56 Cohen, J., "Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1983

    57 Hulin, C. L., "Applications of item response theory to analysis of scale translation" 67 : 818-825, 1982

    58 Bordin, E. S., "A working alliance based model of supervisor" 11 : 35-42, 1983

    59 Heppner, P. P., "A study of the interpersonal influence process in supervision" 28 : 437-444, 1981

    60 Sue, D. W., "A modal for cultural diversity training" 70 : 99-105, 1991

    61 Nelson, M. L., "A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee’s perspective" 48 : 384-395, 2001

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-06-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Psychology -> Korean Journal of Psychology: General KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.31 1.31 1.63
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.13 2.1 2.669 0.8
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼