RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      조세회피를 위한 역외유보소득의 횡령과 조세포탈죄 = A Study on the Crime of Tax Evasion by Embezzling Income of the Foreign Companyretained Overseas

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100282328

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In a case that a Korean resident who is a CEO or a de facto manager of the foreign company in a foreign jurisdiction embezzled the overseas income of the company, it comes into question whether he or she should be punished for the crime of tax evasion. The Supreme Court has ruled that a CEO who embezzled and possessed the profits of the domestic company may not be punished for the tax evasion of individual income on the assumption that such taxation may be imposed by the dispositon of income. This ruling, however, does not mean that the CEO or a de facto manager of the foreign company who deferred his or her income overseas by embezzling the corporation profits cannot be punished for the tax evasion of individual tax at all. Especially, it must be considered offshore tax evasion is elaborately designed in order to avoid the dispositon of income by virtue of the jurisdictional limitation. In such cases, if it is proven that the profits of the foreign company were illicitly belonged to the CEO or the de facto manager as earned income or income from dividends in reality, he or she must be liable to pay income tax without the dispositon of income. In addition, such fraudulence to conceal overseas income must be strictly regulated by criminal punishment.
      번역하기

      In a case that a Korean resident who is a CEO or a de facto manager of the foreign company in a foreign jurisdiction embezzled the overseas income of the company, it comes into question whether he or she should be punished for the crime of tax evasion...

      In a case that a Korean resident who is a CEO or a de facto manager of the foreign company in a foreign jurisdiction embezzled the overseas income of the company, it comes into question whether he or she should be punished for the crime of tax evasion. The Supreme Court has ruled that a CEO who embezzled and possessed the profits of the domestic company may not be punished for the tax evasion of individual income on the assumption that such taxation may be imposed by the dispositon of income. This ruling, however, does not mean that the CEO or a de facto manager of the foreign company who deferred his or her income overseas by embezzling the corporation profits cannot be punished for the tax evasion of individual tax at all. Especially, it must be considered offshore tax evasion is elaborately designed in order to avoid the dispositon of income by virtue of the jurisdictional limitation. In such cases, if it is proven that the profits of the foreign company were illicitly belonged to the CEO or the de facto manager as earned income or income from dividends in reality, he or she must be liable to pay income tax without the dispositon of income. In addition, such fraudulence to conceal overseas income must be strictly regulated by criminal punishment.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼