RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      새로운 한국의료기관평가인증제의 이해 = Understanding of the new Korea Healthcare Accreditation System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104749192

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Korean Healthcare Accreditation System began to be applied to most Korean hospitals this year, yet it remains unfamiliar to us. There has been much criticism regarding the Hos-pital Evaluation Program that began in 2004 because of its formalities and its perceived ineffec-tiveness in improving the healthcare environment. Because of these issues, the new healthcare accreditation system was adopted to continuously improve the quality of the healthcare fields. Many countries, including the United States, are employing accreditation systems and have developed their systems with consideration for their own cultural backgrounds and medical envi-ronments. Unlike the evaluation program, which ranks hospitals, the new accreditation system tries to see the root of every behavior rather than focusing on formalities like the size of and faci-lities available at hospitals. The appraiser s ability to correctly judge is very important. For the hospitals, understanding the significance of accreditation, which follows quality improvement, is most important. Besides, the accreditation system is a volunteer system, which is unfamiliar to us (we are used to a passive evaluation system) and can cause confusion. It also has a risk of falling into disuse like the past evaluation system if we try to obtain quick results from the new system. Ample time is needed to make adjustments through trial and error, and for medical pro-fessionals to discover how to properly use the new accreditation system. It is important to consi-der its meaning and principles first.
      번역하기

      The Korean Healthcare Accreditation System began to be applied to most Korean hospitals this year, yet it remains unfamiliar to us. There has been much criticism regarding the Hos-pital Evaluation Program that began in 2004 because of its formalities ...

      The Korean Healthcare Accreditation System began to be applied to most Korean hospitals this year, yet it remains unfamiliar to us. There has been much criticism regarding the Hos-pital Evaluation Program that began in 2004 because of its formalities and its perceived ineffec-tiveness in improving the healthcare environment. Because of these issues, the new healthcare accreditation system was adopted to continuously improve the quality of the healthcare fields. Many countries, including the United States, are employing accreditation systems and have developed their systems with consideration for their own cultural backgrounds and medical envi-ronments. Unlike the evaluation program, which ranks hospitals, the new accreditation system tries to see the root of every behavior rather than focusing on formalities like the size of and faci-lities available at hospitals. The appraiser s ability to correctly judge is very important. For the hospitals, understanding the significance of accreditation, which follows quality improvement, is most important. Besides, the accreditation system is a volunteer system, which is unfamiliar to us (we are used to a passive evaluation system) and can cause confusion. It also has a risk of falling into disuse like the past evaluation system if we try to obtain quick results from the new system. Ample time is needed to make adjustments through trial and error, and for medical pro-fessionals to discover how to properly use the new accreditation system. It is important to consi-der its meaning and principles first.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.57 0.815 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼