RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      『자에는 자로』(Measure for Measure)에 등장하는 하층 계급 인물 연구 = 폼페이(Pompey) 와 바나딘(Barnardine)을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99876908

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to examine lower characters in Measure for Measure, emphasizing on Pompey and Barnardine. The one is a tapster and pimp working for Mistress Overdone, and the other is a dissolute murderer in prison. In the constable Elbow’s trial scene in Act II, scene i, Pompey shows himself up using his nimble word-play in front of the deputy Angelo and Escalus, and develops a full-scale burlesque of legal procedure by building on a parody of Elbow’s malapropism. Under the deputy Angelo’s regime, however, Pompey is imprisoned for his illegal business along with a number of his old customers of the bawd house. And there, he continues his job not as a bawd but as an assistant of the Executioner, Abhorson. He bridges the theme of fornication into the theme of the heavy crime, murder. Pompey is indeed a representative figure for the ancient profession, prostitute where the line between legal and illegal remains notoriously uncertain.
      Barnardine, a dissolute prisoner is drunken all day long in his prison cell. When he first appears in the prison scene, Act IV, scene iii, his drunkenness dominates the stage ignoring the warrant. Pompey and Abhorson give up to take a next step, and even the disguised Duke can’t help doing anything against him. His refusal to die exposes the gap between the Duke’s bizzare plotting and the actual world. As a murderer, Barnardine is the representative antithesis of the world of comedy that emphasizes preserving and continuing human life. Sparing him from death sentence, therefore, means that he is free to kill people again. On his second appearance in the final act, he keeps silence when the Duke saved his life. Therefore, the meaning and effect of his silence is wide open to the audience and readers as well as the director. In particular, since the quantity of his dialogue is no less than 17 lines, and his appearance is limited, he used to be omitted during the last scene by some directors. If we remind the Angelo’s justice, which put the same weight on the fornication and the murder, Barnardine is the one of the most important figures who takes one opposite of the measure of this play.
      The lower characters in Measure for Measure, are critical mirror in which inverted the structure and assumptions central to the play’s serious action. If their roles were reduced or omitted, therefore, the whole theme of this play would be deformed and its message would be distorted. Even they are indeed minor characters, the function and the effect of their portions are as significant as major characters.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to examine lower characters in Measure for Measure, emphasizing on Pompey and Barnardine. The one is a tapster and pimp working for Mistress Overdone, and the other is a dissolute murderer in prison. In the constable Elbow...

      The purpose of this study is to examine lower characters in Measure for Measure, emphasizing on Pompey and Barnardine. The one is a tapster and pimp working for Mistress Overdone, and the other is a dissolute murderer in prison. In the constable Elbow’s trial scene in Act II, scene i, Pompey shows himself up using his nimble word-play in front of the deputy Angelo and Escalus, and develops a full-scale burlesque of legal procedure by building on a parody of Elbow’s malapropism. Under the deputy Angelo’s regime, however, Pompey is imprisoned for his illegal business along with a number of his old customers of the bawd house. And there, he continues his job not as a bawd but as an assistant of the Executioner, Abhorson. He bridges the theme of fornication into the theme of the heavy crime, murder. Pompey is indeed a representative figure for the ancient profession, prostitute where the line between legal and illegal remains notoriously uncertain.
      Barnardine, a dissolute prisoner is drunken all day long in his prison cell. When he first appears in the prison scene, Act IV, scene iii, his drunkenness dominates the stage ignoring the warrant. Pompey and Abhorson give up to take a next step, and even the disguised Duke can’t help doing anything against him. His refusal to die exposes the gap between the Duke’s bizzare plotting and the actual world. As a murderer, Barnardine is the representative antithesis of the world of comedy that emphasizes preserving and continuing human life. Sparing him from death sentence, therefore, means that he is free to kill people again. On his second appearance in the final act, he keeps silence when the Duke saved his life. Therefore, the meaning and effect of his silence is wide open to the audience and readers as well as the director. In particular, since the quantity of his dialogue is no less than 17 lines, and his appearance is limited, he used to be omitted during the last scene by some directors. If we remind the Angelo’s justice, which put the same weight on the fornication and the murder, Barnardine is the one of the most important figures who takes one opposite of the measure of this play.
      The lower characters in Measure for Measure, are critical mirror in which inverted the structure and assumptions central to the play’s serious action. If their roles were reduced or omitted, therefore, the whole theme of this play would be deformed and its message would be distorted. Even they are indeed minor characters, the function and the effect of their portions are as significant as major characters.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 인용문헌
      • Abstract
      • 인용문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한용재, "정의를 기다리며: 『자에는 자로』에 나타난 법의 문제" 한국셰익스피어학회 42 (42): 149-172, 2006

      2 조성원, "이사벨라의 선택: 자에는 자로에 나타난 구교적 독신주의와 신교적 결혼관?" 한국셰익스피어학회 38 (38): 1025-1048, 2002

      3 김창호, "순자와 셰익스피어 —법의 척도" 한국셰익스피어학회 44 (44): 775-795, 2008

      4 황계정, "셰익스피어의 문제극" 범한출판사 1996

      5 김동욱, "셰익스피어 문제극의 종결부분에 나타난 열린 침묵 연구" 한국 셰익스피어학회 (34) : 93-121, 1998

      6 김동욱, "셰익스피어 대역주석본 시리즈 5: 자에는 자로" 성균관대학교 출판부 2001

      7 이덕수, "비극적 갈등 양식의 희극: Measure for Measure의 경우" (30) : 133-153,

      8 최영주, "무대로 재현된 권력과 욕망" 37 (37): 165-195,

      9 김동욱, "공연중심으로 발전해 가는 최근 셰익스피어 연구 방법론 고찰" 한국 셰익스피어학회 (30) : 1-30, 1997

      10 이행수, "『자에는 자로』의 거울구조" 한국셰익스피어학회 41 (41): 131-151, 2005

      1 한용재, "정의를 기다리며: 『자에는 자로』에 나타난 법의 문제" 한국셰익스피어학회 42 (42): 149-172, 2006

      2 조성원, "이사벨라의 선택: 자에는 자로에 나타난 구교적 독신주의와 신교적 결혼관?" 한국셰익스피어학회 38 (38): 1025-1048, 2002

      3 김창호, "순자와 셰익스피어 —법의 척도" 한국셰익스피어학회 44 (44): 775-795, 2008

      4 황계정, "셰익스피어의 문제극" 범한출판사 1996

      5 김동욱, "셰익스피어 문제극의 종결부분에 나타난 열린 침묵 연구" 한국 셰익스피어학회 (34) : 93-121, 1998

      6 김동욱, "셰익스피어 대역주석본 시리즈 5: 자에는 자로" 성균관대학교 출판부 2001

      7 이덕수, "비극적 갈등 양식의 희극: Measure for Measure의 경우" (30) : 133-153,

      8 최영주, "무대로 재현된 권력과 욕망" 37 (37): 165-195,

      9 김동욱, "공연중심으로 발전해 가는 최근 셰익스피어 연구 방법론 고찰" 한국 셰익스피어학회 (30) : 1-30, 1997

      10 이행수, "『자에는 자로』의 거울구조" 한국셰익스피어학회 41 (41): 131-151, 2005

      11 이병은, "『자에는 자로』에 나타난 칼뱅의 신" 한국셰익스피어학회 41 (41): 535-545, 2005

      12 한광석, "『자에는 자로』에 나타난 성, 종교, 그리고 권력" 37 (37): 421-439,

      13 남현숙, "『자에는 자로』에 나타난 관객 반응 연구" 한국셰익스피어학회 44 (44): 797-822, 2008

      14 신예경, "『자에는 자로』: 텍스트와 독자 사이의 대화적 상상력」" 35 (35): 105-124,

      15 강명희, "『이척도척』: 통치자의 개체화 과정" 37 (37): 705-723,

      16 Condren, Conal, "Unfolding ‘the properties of government’: the case of Measure for Measure and the history of political thought, In Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought" Cambridge UP 157-175, 2009

      17 Dollimore, Jonathan, "Transgression and surveillance in Measure for Measure, In Political Shakespeare: New essays in cultural materialism" Cornell UP 72-87, 1985

      18 Irigari, Luce, "This Sex Which Is Not One" Cornell UP 1985

      19 Knight, George Wilson, "The Wheel of Fire" Methuen 1976

      20 Jamieson, Michael, "The Problem Plays, 1920-1970: A Retrospect" 25 : 1972

      21 Bawcutt, N. W., "The Oxford Shakespeare: Measure for Measure" Oxford UP 1991

      22 Gibbons, Brian, "The New Cambridge Shakespeare: Measure for Measure" Cambridge UP 2003

      23 Goddard, Harold, "The Meaning of Shakespeare, Vol. II" The U of Chicago P 1951

      24 Brown, J. R., "The Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Comedies: 1900-1953" 8 : 1-13, 1955

      25 Gay, Penny, "The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare’s Comedies" Cambridge UP 2008

      26 Lever, J. W., "The Arden Shakespeare: Measure for Measure" Methuen 1980

      27 McGuire, Philip C., "Speechless Dialect: Shakespeare’s Open Silences" U of California P 1985

      28 Kirsch, James, "Shakespeare’s Royal Self" G. P. Putnam’s Sons 1966

      29 Lawrence, W. W., "Shakespeare’s Problem Comedies" MacMillan Co. 1931

      30 Wheeler, Richard P., "Shakespeare’s Development and the Problem Comedies" U of California P 1981

      31 Stead, C. K., "Shakespeare: Measure for Measure - A Selection of Critical Essays" MacMillan 1971

      32 Wells, Stanley, "Shakespeare, Sex, & Love" Oxford UP 2010

      33 Hunter, R. G., "Shakespeare and the Comedy of Forgiveness" Columbia UP 1965

      34 Rose, Jacqueline, "Sexuality in the reading of Shakespeare: Hamlet and Measure for Measure, In Alternative Shakespeares" Methuen & Co. 95-118, 1985

      35 Greenblatt, Stephen, "Renaissance Self-Fashioning" The U of Chicago P 1980

      36 Digangi, Mario, "Pleasure and Danger: Measuring Female Sexuality in Measure of Measure, In Shakespeare Criticism Vol. 25" Gale Research Inc. 12-21, 1994

      37 Lezra, Jacques, "Pirating Reading: The Appearance of History in Measure for Measure, In Shakespeare Criticism Vol. 13" Gale Research Inc. 112-127, 1991

      38 조숙희, "Measure for Measure의 Justice: W. Shakespeare와 H. Brenton의 작품 비교 연구" (30) : 221-241,

      39 정근순, "Measure for Measure에 나타난 인간의 외면과 내면적 모습" (15) : 165-180,

      40 Ryan, Kiernan, "Measure for Measure: Marxism before Marx, In Marxist Shakespeare" Routledge 2001

      41 강명희, "Measure for Measure: Duke의 자아 정립을 위한 희극적 여정 구조" 23 : 23-40,

      42 Chambers, R. W., "Measure for Measure, In Shakespeare: The Comedies" Prentice-Hall, Inc. 88-108, 1965

      43 Battenhouse, Roy, "Measure for Measure and the Christian Doctrine of Atonement" LXI : 1029-1059, 1946

      44 Hattaway, Michael, "Male sexuality and misogyny, In Shakespeare and Sexuality" Cambridge UP 92-115, 2001

      45 Porterfield, Sally, "Jung’s Advice to the Players: A Jungian Reading of Shakespeare’s Problem Plays" Greenwood Press 1994

      46 Watts, Cedric, "Henry V, War Criminal and Other Shakespeare Puzzles" Oxford UP 2000

      47 Watson, Robert N., "False Immorality in Measure for Measure: Comic Means, Tragic Ends" 41 (41): 1990

      48 Fischlin, Daniel, "Adaptations of Shakespeare: A Critical anthology of plays from the seventeenth century to the present" Routledge 2000

      49 Wilson, Harold, "Action and Symbol in Measure for Measure and The Tempest" 4 (4): 375-384, 1953

      50 Rubinstein, Frankie, "A Dictionary of Shakespeare’s Sexual Puns and Their Significance" MacMillan Press 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.11 0.561 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼