RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대안매체로서의 사이버공간의 가능성과 한계

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76339696

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Some recent surveys show the number of worldwide Internet users is more than 300million and it goes beyond 10million in South Korea. That means cyberspace through which men and women interact each other and discuss concerning their interests is rapidly widen and peoples participating in that space are sharply increasing.
    The purpose of this study is to discuss on the potentialities and limits of cyberspace as an alternative media. ‘Alternative media’ and ‘Cyberspace’ are key words of this speculative study. Alternative media movement has arisen from 1970s both as a reaction against the centralism, bureaucratization, and vertical communication of existing media system and as a positive move towards new forms of media system. The movement was primarily based on democratic-participant media hypothesis and ‘alternative public sphere’ discussions and helped to develop them. So, alternative media movement favoured openness, decentralization and horizontality of communication, interaction, interchange of sender-receiver roles, smallness of sale, multiplicity, and so on. Many observers find out those components of alternative media in cyberspace. They emphasize that cyberspace is a democratic and participant medium characterized by openness, horizontality, decentralization, small-scale, interaction, and alternative public sphere, and so on.
    However, it is also true that cyberspace has some limits to realize its own possibilities and potentialities. Some people still far from using cyberspace freely. In cyberspace, there are still stratification resulted from existing economoc and technological power; there are still external control and cencorship; moreover, there are some specific evidences showing the limitations of cyberspace as alternative media or public sphere. In this study, I suggest three requirements for realization of potentialities of cyberspace as alternative media; construction of technological infrastructure for universal service, democratic institutionalization for utilizing cyberspace, and enlargement of civil society area and enlightenment of citizen for civil empowerment.
    번역하기

    Some recent surveys show the number of worldwide Internet users is more than 300million and it goes beyond 10million in South Korea. That means cyberspace through which men and women interact each other and discuss concerning their interests is rapidl...

    Some recent surveys show the number of worldwide Internet users is more than 300million and it goes beyond 10million in South Korea. That means cyberspace through which men and women interact each other and discuss concerning their interests is rapidly widen and peoples participating in that space are sharply increasing.
    The purpose of this study is to discuss on the potentialities and limits of cyberspace as an alternative media. ‘Alternative media’ and ‘Cyberspace’ are key words of this speculative study. Alternative media movement has arisen from 1970s both as a reaction against the centralism, bureaucratization, and vertical communication of existing media system and as a positive move towards new forms of media system. The movement was primarily based on democratic-participant media hypothesis and ‘alternative public sphere’ discussions and helped to develop them. So, alternative media movement favoured openness, decentralization and horizontality of communication, interaction, interchange of sender-receiver roles, smallness of sale, multiplicity, and so on. Many observers find out those components of alternative media in cyberspace. They emphasize that cyberspace is a democratic and participant medium characterized by openness, horizontality, decentralization, small-scale, interaction, and alternative public sphere, and so on.
    However, it is also true that cyberspace has some limits to realize its own possibilities and potentialities. Some people still far from using cyberspace freely. In cyberspace, there are still stratification resulted from existing economoc and technological power; there are still external control and cencorship; moreover, there are some specific evidences showing the limitations of cyberspace as alternative media or public sphere. In this study, I suggest three requirements for realization of potentialities of cyberspace as alternative media; construction of technological infrastructure for universal service, democratic institutionalization for utilizing cyberspace, and enlargement of civil society area and enlightenment of citizen for civil empowerment.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 커뮤니케이션 기술과 ‘대안매체’ 운동의 전개
    • 3. ‘대안매체’ 의 일반적 지향 특성
    • 4. ‘대안매체’ 로서의 사이버 공간의 가능성과 한계
    • 5. 결론
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 커뮤니케이션 기술과 ‘대안매체’ 운동의 전개
    • 3. ‘대안매체’ 의 일반적 지향 특성
    • 4. ‘대안매체’ 로서의 사이버 공간의 가능성과 한계
    • 5. 결론
    • 참고 문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼