The paper aims to search for korean vocabulary used in the past, interpreting the terms of the vessels recorded in the loan words of Chinese in <yeongjouigwe>. All the terms shown in uigwe were recorded in Chinese, but most of them were just lo...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The paper aims to search for korean vocabulary used in the past, interpreting the terms of the vessels recorded in the loan words of Chinese in <yeongjouigwe>. All the terms shown in uigwe were recorded in Chinese, but most of them were just lo...
The paper aims to search for korean vocabulary used in the past, interpreting the terms of the vessels recorded in the loan words of Chinese in <yeongjouigwe>.
All the terms shown in uigwe were recorded in Chinese, but most of them were just loaned from the sound and meaning of the Chinese language. That is, in reality, they were represented as the pronunciation of Korean faithfully.
Among them, not a few of the terms for the vessels were not registered in the documents concerned, and the others are different from those defined nowadays. It's helpful to identify and correct most of these vocabulary through this study.
To sum up the conclusions are the followings. First, in the existed study concerning '甫兒','所羅' the titles for the vessels were omitted. These are the homonyms which represent the vessels other than each name of the construction materials, name of the musical instruments so the explanation of the titles of the vessels are to be added. The interpretation that '설자" is '석쇠' should be Second, '方文(器, 九)里', '鐘子', '沙鉢' are the examples which sees the appliances as the names of the persons. These are named after those similar to the features of the appearances and the appliances in naming of slavers.
Lastly, '대접(大貼>金', '所湯(伊)', `方文(器)里', 甫兒', '空石', 沙鉢', '三太(台)', '所羅', '所用', 鍾子', '干(??)里' are the homonyms, which are to be interpreted according to the contexts. (Catholic University of Daegu)