RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    특수교사 교육과정 이해도, 만족도 및 실천력의 구조 분석 = A Structural Analysis of Special Education Teachers’ Curriculum Understanding, Satisfaction, and Enactment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110127872

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose This study was conducted to derive implications for improving the quality of implementing the given curriculum in special education through a structural analysis of nationally documented factors such as curriculum understanding, satisfaction, and awareness and practice of curriculum implementation.
    Method To derive a structural model among the three factors of special education teachers’ curriculum understanding, satisfaction, awareness and practice, a structural equation model (SEM) was conducted using the R lavaan statistical program.
    Results Using the responses of a total of 549 special education teachers who participated in the survey, a structural analysis of curriculum understanding, satisfaction, awareness and practice was conducted. The results showed that the full mediation model was not verified, and the partial mediation model verified the appropriateness of the structural model. In other words, curriculum understanding was revealed to be the strongest factor influencing awareness and practice of curriculum implementation. However, there were no significant relationships between curriculum understanding and curriculum satisfaction, or between curriculum satisfaction and awareness and practice of curriculum implementation.
    Conclusion Understanding the curriculum was found to be the most important factor in shaping awareness and implementation of the curriculum, while satisfaction with the curriculum did not significantly impact actual implementation. These findings led to discussion and suggestions.
    번역하기

    Purpose This study was conducted to derive implications for improving the quality of implementing the given curriculum in special education through a structural analysis of nationally documented factors such as curriculum understanding, satisfaction, ...

    Purpose This study was conducted to derive implications for improving the quality of implementing the given curriculum in special education through a structural analysis of nationally documented factors such as curriculum understanding, satisfaction, and awareness and practice of curriculum implementation.
    Method To derive a structural model among the three factors of special education teachers’ curriculum understanding, satisfaction, awareness and practice, a structural equation model (SEM) was conducted using the R lavaan statistical program.
    Results Using the responses of a total of 549 special education teachers who participated in the survey, a structural analysis of curriculum understanding, satisfaction, awareness and practice was conducted. The results showed that the full mediation model was not verified, and the partial mediation model verified the appropriateness of the structural model. In other words, curriculum understanding was revealed to be the strongest factor influencing awareness and practice of curriculum implementation. However, there were no significant relationships between curriculum understanding and curriculum satisfaction, or between curriculum satisfaction and awareness and practice of curriculum implementation.
    Conclusion Understanding the curriculum was found to be the most important factor in shaping awareness and implementation of the curriculum, while satisfaction with the curriculum did not significantly impact actual implementation. These findings led to discussion and suggestions.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼