RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중도·중복 장애 영유아 대상 중재 연구에 대한 체계적 문헌분석 = A Systematic Review of Intervention Research for Young Children with Severe and Multiple Disabilities

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110127875

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically review intervention research on young children with severe and multiple disabilities conducted in South Korea, analyze publication trends and general research characteristics, and evaluate methodological quality based on established quality indicators.
    Method Nineteen intervention studies published in peer-reviewed journals in South Korea were analyzed. Content analysis examined key methodological characteristics, including research designs, variables, intervention settings, and interventionists. In addition, singlesubject studies were evaluated using the evidence-based practice quality indicators proposed by the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC; 2014).
    Results Most studies employed single-subject designs and focused on children aged three to five years, with augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as the most frequently used intervention. Outcomes primarily targeted communication and social interaction skills, and few studies reported effect size measures. Quality indicator analysis showed relatively high compliance in data analysis, outcome measurement, and internal validity, but lower compliance in indicators related to replicability, such as interventionist qualifications and intervention fidelity.
    Conclusion This review highlights both the strengths and methodological limitations of domestic intervention research for young children with severe and multiple disabilities and underscores the need to improve research design and reporting standards to support evidence-based practice and practical application.
    번역하기

    Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically review intervention research on young children with severe and multiple disabilities conducted in South Korea, analyze publication trends and general research characteristics, and evaluate method...

    Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically review intervention research on young children with severe and multiple disabilities conducted in South Korea, analyze publication trends and general research characteristics, and evaluate methodological quality based on established quality indicators.
    Method Nineteen intervention studies published in peer-reviewed journals in South Korea were analyzed. Content analysis examined key methodological characteristics, including research designs, variables, intervention settings, and interventionists. In addition, singlesubject studies were evaluated using the evidence-based practice quality indicators proposed by the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC; 2014).
    Results Most studies employed single-subject designs and focused on children aged three to five years, with augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as the most frequently used intervention. Outcomes primarily targeted communication and social interaction skills, and few studies reported effect size measures. Quality indicator analysis showed relatively high compliance in data analysis, outcome measurement, and internal validity, but lower compliance in indicators related to replicability, such as interventionist qualifications and intervention fidelity.
    Conclusion This review highlights both the strengths and methodological limitations of domestic intervention research for young children with severe and multiple disabilities and underscores the need to improve research design and reporting standards to support evidence-based practice and practical application.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼