RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국에서의 도시 및 농촌아동의 신체상의 비교연구 = COMPERATIVE STUDY OF BODY IMAGE BETWEEN URBAN AND RURAL CHILDREN IN KOREA

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A1994885

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    For the purpose of comparative study of the body image between urban and rural children in Korea, the author administered Machover's draw-a-person test to 100 cases of urban children and 100 cases of rural children. As a scoring system the author adopted Ootomo's system of problem indices and symbolic factor analysis.
    The result obtained were as follows:
    1. The age distribution of these two groups were similar and the average age of the urban children was 9.2 years and the rural children 8.6 years. Among the urban group first and last born children were more than among rural group and the rural one have more family members than the urban.
    The urban children supposed to have the opportunities of having more civilized
    facilities than the rural children.
    2. Results of the analysis of the portraits which were drawn by the two groups are as follow;
    On the age of their drawn portraits the rural one designated 9 to 10 years. As to the impression of the portraits which they drawn almost of the rural children sad, "I don't like it.". To the question of the portraits future career the answer of the urban one were teacher or scientist, on the other hand, the rural one farmer or worker.
    3. The analysis of the drawing place revealed that most of the rural children drew on the left side of the upper part. Comparing the size of the portrait, the urban children drew bigger than the rural children, and the majority of the rural children drew in profile.
    4. As to the characteristics of the bodily parts of their portraits, the urban children's portraits showed emphasized hair, emphasized pupil, omitted nose, omitted eyebrow, figures being omitted leg and foot, elaborated clothes and figure with necktie.
    The rural children's portraits showed omitted pupil, emphasized nostril, large mouth and mouth with showing teeth, square body, thin arm and finger without hand, figure with navel, poor discrimination of sexes, hardly distinguishable line of clothes.
    5. From these results the differences of personality characteristics between rural children and urban children supposed to be as follows;
    The rural children exhibit more oral aggressiveness, tendency of striving for physical strength, poor sexual identity, more dependent need and self centric tendency.
    Instead the urban children exhibited the tendency of striving intellectual power, alertness and interests toward his environment, more active attitude but insecurity of their sense of belongingness.
    번역하기

    For the purpose of comparative study of the body image between urban and rural children in Korea, the author administered Machover's draw-a-person test to 100 cases of urban children and 100 cases of rural children. As a scoring system the author adop...

    For the purpose of comparative study of the body image between urban and rural children in Korea, the author administered Machover's draw-a-person test to 100 cases of urban children and 100 cases of rural children. As a scoring system the author adopted Ootomo's system of problem indices and symbolic factor analysis.
    The result obtained were as follows:
    1. The age distribution of these two groups were similar and the average age of the urban children was 9.2 years and the rural children 8.6 years. Among the urban group first and last born children were more than among rural group and the rural one have more family members than the urban.
    The urban children supposed to have the opportunities of having more civilized
    facilities than the rural children.
    2. Results of the analysis of the portraits which were drawn by the two groups are as follow;
    On the age of their drawn portraits the rural one designated 9 to 10 years. As to the impression of the portraits which they drawn almost of the rural children sad, "I don't like it.". To the question of the portraits future career the answer of the urban one were teacher or scientist, on the other hand, the rural one farmer or worker.
    3. The analysis of the drawing place revealed that most of the rural children drew on the left side of the upper part. Comparing the size of the portrait, the urban children drew bigger than the rural children, and the majority of the rural children drew in profile.
    4. As to the characteristics of the bodily parts of their portraits, the urban children's portraits showed emphasized hair, emphasized pupil, omitted nose, omitted eyebrow, figures being omitted leg and foot, elaborated clothes and figure with necktie.
    The rural children's portraits showed omitted pupil, emphasized nostril, large mouth and mouth with showing teeth, square body, thin arm and finger without hand, figure with navel, poor discrimination of sexes, hardly distinguishable line of clothes.
    5. From these results the differences of personality characteristics between rural children and urban children supposed to be as follows;
    The rural children exhibit more oral aggressiveness, tendency of striving for physical strength, poor sexual identity, more dependent need and self centric tendency.
    Instead the urban children exhibited the tendency of striving intellectual power, alertness and interests toward his environment, more active attitude but insecurity of their sense of belongingness.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 대상 및 조사 분석방법
    • 1. 대상 및 조사기간
    • 2. 검사 및 분석방법
    • Ⅲ. 결 과
    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 대상 및 조사 분석방법
    • 1. 대상 및 조사기간
    • 2. 검사 및 분석방법
    • Ⅲ. 결 과
    • 1. 개인력의 비고
    • 2. 인물화에 대한 설문의 비교
    • 3. 구성적 및 신체부위별 반응평가
    • Ⅳ. 고 안
    • Ⅴ. 결 론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼