RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Analysis of Continuity of Care and Its Related Factors in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108197957

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Continuity of care in primary care settings is crucial for managing diabetes. We aimed to statistically define and analyze continuity factors associated with demographics, clinical workforce, and geographical relation-ships.Methods: We use...

      Background: Continuity of care in primary care settings is crucial for managing diabetes. We aimed to statistically define and analyze continuity factors associated with demographics, clinical workforce, and geographical relation-ships.Methods: We used 2014–2015 National Health Insurance Service claims data from the Korean registry, with 39,096 eligible outpatient attendance. We applied multivariable logistic regression to analyze factors that may affect the continuity of care indices for each patient: the most frequent provider continuity index (MFPCI), modified-modi-fied continuity index (MMCI), and continuity of care index (COCI).Results: The mean continuity of care indices were 0.90, 0.96, and 0.85 for MFPCI, MMCI and COCI, respectively. Among patient factors, old age >80 years (MFPCI: odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74–0.89; MMCI: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76–0.92; and COCI: OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–0.89) and mild disability were strongly associ-ated with lower continuity of care. Another significant factor was the residential area: the farther the patients lived from their primary care clinic, the lower the continuity of diabetes care (MFPCI: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70–0.78; MMCI: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66–0.73; and COCI: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70–0.78).Conclusion: The geographical proximity of patients’ residential areas and clinic locations showed the strongest correlation as a continuity factor. Further efforts are needed to improve continuity of care to address the geographi-cal imbalance in diabetic care.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 윤채현 ; 이신재 ; 주수영 ; 문옥륜 ; 박재현, "우리나라 당뇨병 환자의 진료 지속성 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인" 대한예방의학회 40 (40): 51-58, 2007

      2 은상준 ; 홍지영 ; 이진용 ; 이진석 ; 김윤 ; 김용익 ; 신영수, "외래진료 민감질환 유질환자 중장애인과 비장애인의 의료이용률 차이" 대한예방의학회 39 (39): 411-418, 2006

      3 Alazri MH, "UK GPs’ and practice nurses’views of continuity of care for patients with type 2 diabetes" 24 : 128-137, 2007

      4 Laiteerapong N, "The legacy effect in type 2 diabetes : impact of early glycemic control on future complications(The Diabetes & Aging Study)" 42 : 416-426, 2019

      5 Bodenheimer T, "The 10building blocks of high-performing primary care" 12 : 166-171, 2014

      6 Hong JS, "Relationship between continuity of ambulatory care and medication adherence in adult patients with type 2 diabetes in Korea : a longitudinal analysis" 52 : 446-453, 2014

      7 Starfield B., "Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services: SESPAS report 2012" 26 (26): 20-26, 2012

      8 Ministry of Heath and Welfare, "Ministry of Heath and Welfare (MOHW) homepage" Ministry of Heath and Welfare

      9 Lustman A, "Interpersonal continuity of care and type two diabetes" 10 : 165-170, 2016

      10 Shin DW, "Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs : a nationwide cohort study in Korea" 12 : 534-541, 2014

      1 윤채현 ; 이신재 ; 주수영 ; 문옥륜 ; 박재현, "우리나라 당뇨병 환자의 진료 지속성 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인" 대한예방의학회 40 (40): 51-58, 2007

      2 은상준 ; 홍지영 ; 이진용 ; 이진석 ; 김윤 ; 김용익 ; 신영수, "외래진료 민감질환 유질환자 중장애인과 비장애인의 의료이용률 차이" 대한예방의학회 39 (39): 411-418, 2006

      3 Alazri MH, "UK GPs’ and practice nurses’views of continuity of care for patients with type 2 diabetes" 24 : 128-137, 2007

      4 Laiteerapong N, "The legacy effect in type 2 diabetes : impact of early glycemic control on future complications(The Diabetes & Aging Study)" 42 : 416-426, 2019

      5 Bodenheimer T, "The 10building blocks of high-performing primary care" 12 : 166-171, 2014

      6 Hong JS, "Relationship between continuity of ambulatory care and medication adherence in adult patients with type 2 diabetes in Korea : a longitudinal analysis" 52 : 446-453, 2014

      7 Starfield B., "Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services: SESPAS report 2012" 26 (26): 20-26, 2012

      8 Ministry of Heath and Welfare, "Ministry of Heath and Welfare (MOHW) homepage" Ministry of Heath and Welfare

      9 Lustman A, "Interpersonal continuity of care and type two diabetes" 10 : 165-170, 2016

      10 Shin DW, "Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs : a nationwide cohort study in Korea" 12 : 534-541, 2014

      11 International Diabetes Federation, "IDF diabetes atlas. 9th ed"

      12 Gupta R, "How primary care practices can improve continuity of care" 173 : 1885-1886, 2013

      13 Laursen B, "Health service use in adults 20-64 years with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury or pelvic fracture : a cohort study with 9-year follow-up" 2 : e001521-, 2012

      14 Weiss LJ, "Faithful patients : the effect of long-term physicianpatient relationships on the costs and use of health care by older Americans" 86 : 1742-1747, 1996

      15 Given CW, "Evaluation and application of continuity measures in primary care settings" 10 : 22-41, 1985

      16 Kauhl B, "Do the risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus vary by location? : a spatial analysis of health insurance claims in Northeastern Germany using kernel density estimation and geographically weighted regression" 15 : 38-, 2016

      17 Health Quality Ontario, "Continuity of care to optimize chronic disease management in the community setting : an evidence-based analysis" 13 : 1-41, 2013

      18 Koopman RJ, "Continuity of care and recognition of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia" 163 : 1357-1361, 2003

      19 Hussey PS, "Continuity and the costs of care for chronic disease" 174 : 742-748, 2014

      20 Bice TW, "A quantitative measure of continuity of care" 15 : 347-349, 1977

      21 Magill MK, "A new method for measuring continuity of care in family practice residencies" 24 : 165-168, 1987

      22 Cheng SH, "A longitudinal examination of continuity of care and avoidable hospitalization : evidence from a universal coverage health care system" 170 : 1671-1677, 2010

      23 김미경 ; 고승현 ; 김보연 ; 강은석 ; 노정현 ; 김수경 ; 박석오 ; 허규연 ; 전숙 ; 문민경 ; 김난희 ; 김상용 ; 이상열 ; 이강우 ; 김재현 ; 이은정 ; 전성완 ; 유성훈 ; 김대중 ; 권혁상 ; 박경수, "2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Korea" 대한당뇨병학회 43 (43): 398-406, 2019

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-09-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 가정의학회지 -> Korean Journal of Family Medicine KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-12-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine -> Korean Journal of Family Medicine KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.24 0.26 0.54 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼