RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    작전운용성능 수정 원인 분석과 진화적 획득 평가항목지표 개발 연구 = Analysis of the Cause of Required Operational Capability(ROC) Correction and A Study on the Development of Evaluation Item Index for an Evolutionary Acquisition

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108727741

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Weapon systems' required operational capability (ROC) is an important factor that determines the success of a new weapon system for performance and acquisition. Excessive ROC can delay a project or cause failure, while if it is too low, it can lead to technology obsolescence. Therefore, in order to successfully acquire new weapon systems, a single or evolutionary acquisition strategy must be determined based on the ROC. The purpose of this study was to analyze the causes of ROC correction by identifying 160 cases in the last 10 years (2011-2020). Then, 'evaluation item index' to apply to the evolutionary acquisition/ROC of a new weapon system project was developed, and the weight (importance) and priorities were determined through an analytic hierarchical process (AHP). The main correction causes were classified using 6 categories, and the most frequent one was the difficulty of predicting the technology level (41%). There are 8 evaluation item indexes based on the correction causes, such as "technical readiness level (0.428)" and "military force delivery time (0.128)," which have high weights. The "evolutionary acquisition/ROC evaluation item index" presented in this paper is expected to help with rational and scientific decision-making during the review process to apply evolutionary acquisition strategies and contribute to successful weapons-system acquisition projects.
    번역하기

    Weapon systems' required operational capability (ROC) is an important factor that determines the success of a new weapon system for performance and acquisition. Excessive ROC can delay a project or cause failure, while if it is too low, it can lead to...

    Weapon systems' required operational capability (ROC) is an important factor that determines the success of a new weapon system for performance and acquisition. Excessive ROC can delay a project or cause failure, while if it is too low, it can lead to technology obsolescence. Therefore, in order to successfully acquire new weapon systems, a single or evolutionary acquisition strategy must be determined based on the ROC. The purpose of this study was to analyze the causes of ROC correction by identifying 160 cases in the last 10 years (2011-2020). Then, 'evaluation item index' to apply to the evolutionary acquisition/ROC of a new weapon system project was developed, and the weight (importance) and priorities were determined through an analytic hierarchical process (AHP). The main correction causes were classified using 6 categories, and the most frequent one was the difficulty of predicting the technology level (41%). There are 8 evaluation item indexes based on the correction causes, such as "technical readiness level (0.428)" and "military force delivery time (0.128)," which have high weights. The "evolutionary acquisition/ROC evaluation item index" presented in this paper is expected to help with rational and scientific decision-making during the review process to apply evolutionary acquisition strategies and contribute to successful weapons-system acquisition projects.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 천종웅 ; 정석재, "무기체계 진화적 작전운용성능(ROC) 적용 가능성 판단을 위한 평가지표 연구" 화랑대연구소 75 (75): 143-172, 2019

    2 엄동환, "무기체계 작전운용성능 설정 및 시험평가방법 개선에 대한 연구" 한국시스템엔지니어링학회 15 (15): 9-16, 2019

    3 HUFFPOST, "They say they are training together with equipment that can't even identify friends and family"

    4 John C. Mankins, "Technology Readiness Levels, White paper" 1995

    5 Park, G. H., "Problems and Countermeasures of 'GOP Scientific Guard System Project' which failed for 7years" The 21st Century Korea Research Institute for Military Affairs 50-57, 2012

    6 News2day, "North Korea’s Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Threat, Claims “Need to Reinforce Capacity from a Systematic Perspective”" News today corporation

    7 Kwon, O. J., "Multi-criteria Decision Making Methodology Theory and Application" Bookshill 610-, 2018

    8 MunHwa Newspaper, "Enemy Missile Evasion ‘Acceleration Performance’ K-2 ‘9 Sec’ vs Germany Tank ‘6Sec’"

    9 Editorial Department, "Defense and Technology" Korea Defense Industry Association 14-15, 2014

    10 Military Force Policy Division, "Defense Forces Development Task Official Order" Korean Law Information Center Publishers 9-10, 2022

    1 천종웅 ; 정석재, "무기체계 진화적 작전운용성능(ROC) 적용 가능성 판단을 위한 평가지표 연구" 화랑대연구소 75 (75): 143-172, 2019

    2 엄동환, "무기체계 작전운용성능 설정 및 시험평가방법 개선에 대한 연구" 한국시스템엔지니어링학회 15 (15): 9-16, 2019

    3 HUFFPOST, "They say they are training together with equipment that can't even identify friends and family"

    4 John C. Mankins, "Technology Readiness Levels, White paper" 1995

    5 Park, G. H., "Problems and Countermeasures of 'GOP Scientific Guard System Project' which failed for 7years" The 21st Century Korea Research Institute for Military Affairs 50-57, 2012

    6 News2day, "North Korea’s Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Threat, Claims “Need to Reinforce Capacity from a Systematic Perspective”" News today corporation

    7 Kwon, O. J., "Multi-criteria Decision Making Methodology Theory and Application" Bookshill 610-, 2018

    8 MunHwa Newspaper, "Enemy Missile Evasion ‘Acceleration Performance’ K-2 ‘9 Sec’ vs Germany Tank ‘6Sec’"

    9 Editorial Department, "Defense and Technology" Korea Defense Industry Association 14-15, 2014

    10 Military Force Policy Division, "Defense Forces Development Task Official Order" Korean Law Information Center Publishers 9-10, 2022

    11 Ministry of National Defense, Republic of Korea, "Defense Budget"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼