Long-term results of oncoplastic breast surgery with latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction = a pilot study of the objective cosmetic results and patient reported outcome

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The goal of oncoplastic breast surgery is to restore the appearance of the breast and improve patient satisfaction. Thus, the assessment of cosmetic results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using appropriately constructed and validated instruments is essential. The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term objective cosmetic results and corresponding PROs after oncoplastic breast surgery.
Methods: Cosmetic results were assessed by the patients, a medical panel, and a computer program (BCCT.core). PROs were assessed using BREAST-Q, a questionnaire that measures the perception of patients having breast surgery. The cosmetic results and PROs were analyzed in patients who underwent quadrantectomy and partial breast reconstruction utilizing the latissimus dorsi flap.
Results: The mean duration of the follow-up period was 91.6 months (range, 33.3–171.0 months), and mean age of the patients was 51 years old (range, 33–72 years). The mean tumor size was 2.1 cm (range, 0.9–5.5 cm). There was fair agreement between the medical panel and BCCT.core score (K = 0.32, P < 0.001), and a statistically significant correlation between the BCCT.core score and medical panel cosmetic results was identified (r = 0.606, P < 0.001). A better BCCT.core result was related to a higher PRO of each BREAST-Q domain—satisfaction with breasts (R<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.070, P = 0.039), satisfaction with outcome (R2 = 0.087, P = 0.021), psychosocial well-being (R<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.085, P = 0.023), sexual well-being (R<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.082, P = 0.029), and satisfaction with information (R<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.064, P = 0.049).
Conclusion: Our long-term results of oncoplastic surgery achieved a high level of patient satisfaction with good cosmetic results. The medical panel and BCCT.core results correlated well with the PROs of the patients using valid, reliable, and procedure-specific measures.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• INTRODUCTION
• METHODS
• RESULTS
• DISCUSSION
• REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Fisher B., "Twentyyear follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer" 347 : 1233-1241, 2002

2 Cardoso MJ., "Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment" 16 : 456-461, 2007

3 Cardoso JS., "Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment" 40 : 115-126, 2007

4 김지선, "The Basic Facts of Korean Breast Cancer in 2011: Results of a Nationwide Survey and Breast Cancer Registry Database" 한국유방암학회 17 (17): 99-106, 2014

5 Cano SJ., "The BREAST-Q : further validation in independent clinical samples" 129 : 293-302, 2012

6 Denewer A., "Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction by a new modification of extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap" 32 : 2586-2592, 2008

7 Kim Z., "Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction : a retrospective analysis of the surgical and patient-reported outcomes" 10 : 259-, 2012

8 Klassen AF., "Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery : a qualitative study" 9 : 11-, 2009

9 Tomita K., "Recovery of sensation in immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps after breast-conservative surgery and skin-sparing mastectomy" 66 : 334-338, 2011

10 Sacchini V., "Quantitative and qualitative cosmetic eva luation after conservative treatment for breast cancer" 27 : 1395-1400, 1991

11 Semprini G., "Oncoplastic surgery and cancer relapses : cosmetic and oncological results in 489 patients" 22 : 946-951, 2013

12 Hernanz F., "Oncoplastic breast-conserving sur gery : analysis of quadrantectomy and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap" 31 : 1934-1940, 2007

13 Cardoso JS., "Modelling ordinal relations with SVMs : An application to objective aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment" 18 : 808-817, 2005

14 Ching S., "Measuring outcomes in aesthetic sur gery : a comprehensive review of the literature" 111 : 469-480, 2003

15 Fung JT., "Mammographic determination of breast volume by elliptical cone estimation" 34 : 1442-1445, 2010

16 Cardoso MJ., "Is face-only photographic view enough for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment?" 112 : 565-568, 2008

17 Cardoso MJ., "Interobserver agreement and consensus over the esthetic evaluation of conservative treatment for breast cancer" 15 : 52-57, 2006

18 Gendy RK., "Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breastsparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery" 90 : 433-439, 2003

19 Pusic AL., "Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery : the BREAST-Q" 124 : 345-353, 2009

20 Cardoso MJ., "Comparing two objective methods for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment" 116 : 149-152, 2009

21 Kim MS., "Assessment of breast aesthetics" 121 : 186e-194e, 2008

22 Harris JR., "Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast" 5 : 257-261, 1979

23 Oliveira HP., "An accurate and interpretable model for BCCT.core" 2010 : 6158-6161, 2010

24 Winters ZE., "A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life" 252 : 929-942, 2010

25 Charfare H., "A com parison of different methods of assessing cosmetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery and factors influencing cosmetic outcome" 3 : 310-, 2010

26 Cano SJ., "A closer look at the BREAST-Q(©)" 40 : 287-296, 2013