RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    중학교 제도수업에서 퍼즐(somacube)활용수업방법이 학생의 기술적 창의력 계발에 미치는 효과 = Effects of Using Puzzle Method in Technology Drawing Instruction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104837735

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research was to find out the effectiveness of using puzzle(somacube) method in developing technological creativity in drafting instruction. The subject for experiment was first grade middle school students. The post-test only control design was used in this study because the subjects were purposive sampled. The experimental group was taught by the using puzzle(somacube) method and the control group was taught by the traditional method. The content for the experimental treatment was 'Basic of Drafting', learning unit in the Technology textbook for first grade. The experiment was conducted from April 19, 2004 to May 1, 2004.The independent variable were industrial strategies(the using puzzle(somacube) method and traditional method as an instructional strategies) and scholastic attainment(high, middle and low) The dependent variable was the ability in use of technical creativity composed of sensitivity, fluency, flexibility, originality and elaborateness.The statistical techniques used for data analysis were t-test, two-way ANOVA. An alpha level of .05 was established prior to data treatment.The major findings of this study were as follow :1. There was statistically significant difference (P=<0.05) between post-test scores of students in the using puzzle(somacube) method(adjusted means=11.58) and those of students in traditional method(adjusted means=8.89)2. The variables verified statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group were high level students(t=-2.927, p<0.05) of the scholastic attainment.3. There was no interaction effect between variables of instructional strategies and variables of the scholastic attainment(p<0.05)
    번역하기

    This research was to find out the effectiveness of using puzzle(somacube) method in developing technological creativity in drafting instruction. The subject for experiment was first grade middle school students. The post-test only control design was u...

    This research was to find out the effectiveness of using puzzle(somacube) method in developing technological creativity in drafting instruction. The subject for experiment was first grade middle school students. The post-test only control design was used in this study because the subjects were purposive sampled. The experimental group was taught by the using puzzle(somacube) method and the control group was taught by the traditional method. The content for the experimental treatment was 'Basic of Drafting', learning unit in the Technology textbook for first grade. The experiment was conducted from April 19, 2004 to May 1, 2004.The independent variable were industrial strategies(the using puzzle(somacube) method and traditional method as an instructional strategies) and scholastic attainment(high, middle and low) The dependent variable was the ability in use of technical creativity composed of sensitivity, fluency, flexibility, originality and elaborateness.The statistical techniques used for data analysis were t-test, two-way ANOVA. An alpha level of .05 was established prior to data treatment.The major findings of this study were as follow :1. There was statistically significant difference (P=<0.05) between post-test scores of students in the using puzzle(somacube) method(adjusted means=11.58) and those of students in traditional method(adjusted means=8.89)2. The variables verified statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group were high level students(t=-2.927, p<0.05) of the scholastic attainment.3. There was no interaction effect between variables of instructional strategies and variables of the scholastic attainment(p<0.05)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김용익, "초등생활기술" 교육과학사 2004

    2 문대영, "초,중,고등학교 수준에 적합한 교양기술교육으로서의 제도교육" 17 (17): 1998

    3 이진우, "창의력과 문제해결력을 키워주는 소마큐브 제도수업" 전국기술교사모임 2003

    4 권혁선, "창의력 개발을 위한 제도퍼즐 수업" 한국기술교육학회 학술발표대회 2002

    5 장수웅, "지식기반사회에 대비한 ‘제도’ 교육과정의 새로운 방향" 한국기술교육학회지 1 (1): 105-120, 2001

    6 문대영, "중등학교 학생의 적응자 혁신자 역할분담 문제해결활동이 기술적 창의력 계발에 미치는 효과" 2001

    7 장수웅, "기술교육에서 창의적인 문제 해결 능력을 평가하기 위한 수행평가 요소의 개발" 2 (2): 76-97, 2002

    8 류창열, "기술교육과정 및 평가" 충남대학교 출판부 2002

    9 이상봉, "기술교과 교육의 과제와 개선방향" 한국교육개발원. 1997

    10 이상혁, "기술,가정1" 두산 2001

    1 김용익, "초등생활기술" 교육과학사 2004

    2 문대영, "초,중,고등학교 수준에 적합한 교양기술교육으로서의 제도교육" 17 (17): 1998

    3 이진우, "창의력과 문제해결력을 키워주는 소마큐브 제도수업" 전국기술교사모임 2003

    4 권혁선, "창의력 개발을 위한 제도퍼즐 수업" 한국기술교육학회 학술발표대회 2002

    5 장수웅, "지식기반사회에 대비한 ‘제도’ 교육과정의 새로운 방향" 한국기술교육학회지 1 (1): 105-120, 2001

    6 문대영, "중등학교 학생의 적응자 혁신자 역할분담 문제해결활동이 기술적 창의력 계발에 미치는 효과" 2001

    7 장수웅, "기술교육에서 창의적인 문제 해결 능력을 평가하기 위한 수행평가 요소의 개발" 2 (2): 76-97, 2002

    8 류창열, "기술교육과정 및 평가" 충남대학교 출판부 2002

    9 이상봉, "기술교과 교육의 과제와 개선방향" 한국교육개발원. 1997

    10 이상혁, "기술,가정1" 두산 2001

    11 이재원, "가정교사 기술부전공 연수 교재 [공업제도]" 충남대학교 공과대학 부설 중등 교원연수원 1997

    12 Learing a living, "Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills A blueprint for high performance A SCANS report for American 2000" 1992

    13 Mississippi Research and Curriculum Unit for Vocational and Technical Education, "Mississippi Curriculum Frame work for General Drafting" 1996

    14 Raudebaugh, "Manual Drafting: A Skill for the 21st Century?" 56 (56): 8-12, 1996

    15 Denton, "Efficient and Effective Design" 55 (55): 15-20, 1996

    16 Hill, "A factor analysis of primary mental processes for technological problem soving" 36 (36): 83-100, 1999

    17 류창열, "21세기 정보시대의 새로운 학력: 창의성과 문제해결력" 14-15, 1999

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.52 1.52 1.72
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.66 1.72 2.247 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼