한말~일제초 근대적 토지소유권의 확정과 국유ㆍ민유의 분기 = The Establishment of Modern Land Ownership and Its Separation between the National and the Private in Late Joseon - The Case of Seokjang-dun in Ansan County, Gyeonggi Province

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article deals how reclaimed land, Seokjang-dun[石場屯] in Ansan County came to be integrated into the modern land ownership. By investing money and labor, civilians could hold title to the new lands, on each gyeol[結] of which were levied 100 dus[1 du[斗] is almost equivalent to 18 litters] of rough rice or 40 dus of polished rice by the competent authorities.
During the modern reform period at the end of the nineteenth century, the State did not acknowledge Seokjang-dun as private land. Moreover, it raise the tax on it by the Gabbo Reform[甲午改革] years. Seokjang-dun had to face the crisis of nationalization when the government of the Daehan Empire aggressively carried forward the policy of expanding national land. But it came to be registered in the Gwangmu Terrier[光武量案] and its civilian holders, accepted as virtual owners, officially acquired the private ownership. The original level of taxation also was maintained without any change.
But as the Residency-General of the Imperial Japan, by adopting a new concept of the National Land, absorbed the farms which were created with the participation of official agencies, Seokjang-dun was nationalized. At that time, the right of the State toward each farm was not so clear: whether it was a tax levying one or an ownership, or something in the middle of these two. Nevertheless, the holders of the farms unfortunately included in the list of the national lands were forced to accepted a tenancy contract with the State. The case of Seokjang-dun was no exception.
Later, land holders in Seokjang-dun managed to secure modern ownership through new assessments done by the Land Survey Project. But it should be noted that these “100 dus of rough rice” type farmers, despite bearing the almost same level of tax burden as the officially approved landowners, had to suffer real hardships until they could get land ownership, where nearby civilian farms’ ownerships were being bought and sold since about two hundred years. Modern land readjustment was proceeded in favor of the State, in which the Japanese Imperialism played an leading role.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 갑오개혁 이후 토지조사와 석장둔의 위상변화
• 2. 일제의 토지조사와 석장둔 처리
• 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최원규, "한말 일제초기 토지조사와 토지법 연구" 연세대 1994

2 배영순, "한말 역둔토조사에 있어서의 소유권분쟁" (25) : 1979

3 박찬승, "한말 驛土·屯土에서의 지주경영의 강화와 抗租" 서울대 (9) : 1983

4 김용섭, "한국근대농업사연구 (증보판)" 일조각 1984

5 이영호, "한국근대 지세제도와 농민운동" 서울대학교출판부 2001

6 이영훈, "조선후기 사회경제사" 한길사 1988

7 이영호, "조선후기 간척지의 소유와 운영 - 경기도 안산․인천 石場屯 사례 -" 규장각한국학연구원 (48) : 45-71, 2009

8 심재우, "조선후기 宣禧宮의 연혁과 소속 庄土의 변화" 조선시대사학회 (50) : 189-226, 2009

9 최원규, "일제의 토지조사사업에서 경남 창원지역의 토지소유권 분쟁 - 自如驛 倉屯 사례 -" 부경역사연구소 (21) : 75-122, 2007

10 이영호, "일제의 식민지 토지정책과 미간지 문제" (37) : 2000

11 이영호, "안산·인천 石場屯量案의 토지정보와 성격" 규장각한국학연구원 (35) : 39-150, 2009

12 한국역사연구회 근대사분과 토지대장연구반, "대한제국의 토지조사사업" 민음사 1995

13 한국역사연구회 토지대장연구반, "대한제국의 토지제도와 근대" 혜안 2010

14 박성준, "대한제국기 내장원의 역둔토 경영의 성격" (6) : 1998

15 김양식, "근대권력과 토지" 해남 2000

16 박진태, "갑오개혁기 국유지조사의 성격" 성균관대 (12) : 1997

17 도진순, "19세기 궁장토에서의 중답주와 항조-재령 여물평장토를 중심으로" (13) : 1985

18 박준성, "17·18세기 궁방전의 확대와 소유형태의 변화" (11) : 1984