RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    A Brief Review of the History of Iconicity

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76486514

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper aims to demonstrate a detailed development history of iconicity in its process of struggle against arbitrariness. The debate on arbitrariness and/or iconicity of language sign is one of the oldest in the history of linguistics. It never stopped until Saussure claimed his arbitrariness as the fundamental principle of language. However, iconicity approach did not give way to it, rather carried over and developed by a continuous chain of reflections. By now, it has influenced particular aspects of linguistics and maybe some other areas will shortly be influenced. The conclusion is that the development history of iconicity helps us witness the development history of the whole linguistic science.
    번역하기

      This paper aims to demonstrate a detailed development history of iconicity in its process of struggle against arbitrariness. The debate on arbitrariness and/or iconicity of language sign is one of the oldest in the history of linguistics. ...

      This paper aims to demonstrate a detailed development history of iconicity in its process of struggle against arbitrariness. The debate on arbitrariness and/or iconicity of language sign is one of the oldest in the history of linguistics. It never stopped until Saussure claimed his arbitrariness as the fundamental principle of language. However, iconicity approach did not give way to it, rather carried over and developed by a continuous chain of reflections. By now, it has influenced particular aspects of linguistics and maybe some other areas will shortly be influenced. The conclusion is that the development history of iconicity helps us witness the development history of the whole linguistic science.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. Introduction
      Ⅱ. The Stage of Two Theories at a Deadlock(from the ancient Greek to late in the 19<SUP>th</SUP> century)
      Ⅲ. The Stage of Saussure"s Arbitrariness (from the early 20th century to the 1960s)
      Ⅳ. The Stage of Post-Saussure (from 1960s to the present)
      Ⅴ. Conclusion
      References
    • Ⅰ. Introduction
      Ⅱ. The Stage of Two Theories at a Deadlock(from the ancient Greek to late in the 19<SUP>th</SUP> century)
      Ⅲ. The Stage of Saussure"s Arbitrariness (from the early 20th century to the 1960s)
      Ⅳ. The Stage of Post-Saussure (from 1960s to the present)
      Ⅴ. Conclusion
      References
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼