중학교 교육과정에서의 디자인교육 연계성에 관한 고찰 = Discussion on the connectivity of design education in middle school curriculum

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The proportion occupied by areas of design in the middle school art curriculum in Korea is increasing day by day. Within the current educational process where education is achieved in an integrating manner regardless of the grade, the school environment and the role of teachers are becoming increasingly important. In addition, as a curriculum can be organized to be concentrated in a particular grade or semester depending on the discretion of the school, a systematic execution may face some imitations. As a result of studying the composition and contents of areas of design in a total of 9 varieties of art textbooks used in Korean middles schools, it was analyzed that the following discussions would be necessary. Some of the entailing issues are, first, the issue of difficulty levels according to the teaching subjects; followed by, the issue of section weight in accordance with areas of design, the issue of appropriateness regarding the selection of example figures in the textbook. These issues would be revealed as limitations as an effective integrated education that benefits from the section-specific / grade-specific / domain-specific connectivity. In other words, it is deemed that, in order for the three directions - the historical/cultural value aspects, the individual/social functionality utilization aspects, and the interdisciplinary educational foundation - that are being proposed at the national level as the focus directions of the domestic art education, a multifaceted connective education needs to be established. Thus, as an idea for overcoming the limitations of the current middle school education for design, the following practical challenges for curriculum connectivity are proposed in this study. They are “integrated connectivity” from the aspect of applicability through the “expression” domain and “linear connectivity” through the “appreciation” domain that enables multi-faceted utilization of areas of design. In addition, another would be the composition of educational contents for grade-specific or subject-specific difficulty levels through the formation of “aesthetic experience” focused “grade level connectivity” as the curriculum foundation.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김소현, "한국 중등미술교과 교육과정의 디자인·공예교육 연구 : 중학교 2007개정 미술교과서 분석" 한양대학교 교육대학원 2013

2 교육과학기술부, "초·중등학교 교육과정 총론, 교육과학기술부 고시 제2012-31호[별책1]"

3 조중현, "중학교 미술 교사용 지도서" 도서출판 미진사 2011

4 고승혜, "중학교 미술" 두산동아(주) 2012

5 김정희, "중학교 미술" 지학사 2012

6 김용주, "중학교 미술" ㈜지학사 2012

7 김용숙, "중학교 미술" 일진사 2012

8 조중현, "중학교 미술" 도서출판 미진사 2012

9 이성도, "중학교 미술" 교학연구사 2012

10 안혜영, "중학교 미술" ㈜미래엔 2012

11 박은덕, "중학교 미술" (주)중앙교육진흥연구소 2012

12 노영자, "중학교 미술" (주)교학사 2012

13 교육과학기술부, "미술과 교육과정, 교육과학기술부 고시 제2011-361호[별책13]"

14 방경란, "국내 고등학교 디자인교육 내용 분석 - 2009 개정 미술 검정 교과서 내 예시자료를 중심으로 -" 한국디자인트렌드학회 (37) : 53-64, 2012

15 "http://www.ncic.re.kr/"

16 "http://www.moe.go.kr/main.do"

17 이경언, "2009개정 교육과정에 따른 교과 교육과정 개선 방안 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2010

18 교육과학기술부, "2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 교과 교육과정 개정의 이해" 교육과학기술부 2011