RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      구스타프 쿠르베의 모순 : <화가의 작업실>(1855)을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82651257

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Gustave Courbet was a French painter who led the Realist movement in 19th-century French painting. Since After dinner at Ornans in 1849 Courbet’ s subject had been drawn from the actual life or the living human experience, because he believed that art should reflect the realities in actual life. To represent the hero of today, Courbet used “colossal” dimension required of history painting which the Paris Salon esteemed as painter’s highest calling but rejected as unsuitable for a genre painting. And he employed a larger than life-size which is appropriate for a culture hero. He wanted to give everyday subjects the effect of a monumental history painting. This was to be a transgression of the academic principle.
      In 1855, Courbet submitted fourteen paintings for exhibition at the Universal Exposition. His monumental paintings, The Artist’s Studio and The Burial at Ornans which are his major works of Realism are not admitted to the Universal Exposition. So he decided to organize his own show called The Pavilion of Realism which was a temporary structure that he erected opposite to the Exposition Universe of 1855. In short, he challenged the rigid categories of the Academy not only in a series of his paintings but also in his actual life.
      The artist disregarded authority and convention of the academy. However, the trace of the academic tradition remains still in Courbet's painting. This means he was not immune from the Salon’s view. In this paper I examine the relation between Courbet and the Paris Salon, focusing on the composition and rhetoric of The Artist’s Studio . As I demonstrate, the composition of the picture relates to the academic history painting’s central composition, especially The Sabine Women of Jacques-Louis David. The Artist's Studio was called allegory by Courbet. Allegory is the principle rhetoric of the academic history painting. In 19th-century salon’s paintings, the purpose of allegory was the personification of an abstract concept. He was interested in the allegory as an indirect or veiled mode of expression rather than the allegorical personifications. He created his own realism simultaneously using the tradition and the difference. In The Artist’s Studio, Courbet's massed figures The Contradiction of Gustave Courbet: on The Painter’s Studio, A Real Allegory Summing up a Seven-Year Phase (1855) Lee, Jaeeun(Sungshin Women's University, Lecturer) locate theirs place in the academic composition and are to be the allegorical personification. The kind of contradiction was due to the Salon’s gaze that controled the mainstream art of 19th-century Paris.
      번역하기

      Gustave Courbet was a French painter who led the Realist movement in 19th-century French painting. Since After dinner at Ornans in 1849 Courbet’ s subject had been drawn from the actual life or the living human experience, because he believed that a...

      Gustave Courbet was a French painter who led the Realist movement in 19th-century French painting. Since After dinner at Ornans in 1849 Courbet’ s subject had been drawn from the actual life or the living human experience, because he believed that art should reflect the realities in actual life. To represent the hero of today, Courbet used “colossal” dimension required of history painting which the Paris Salon esteemed as painter’s highest calling but rejected as unsuitable for a genre painting. And he employed a larger than life-size which is appropriate for a culture hero. He wanted to give everyday subjects the effect of a monumental history painting. This was to be a transgression of the academic principle.
      In 1855, Courbet submitted fourteen paintings for exhibition at the Universal Exposition. His monumental paintings, The Artist’s Studio and The Burial at Ornans which are his major works of Realism are not admitted to the Universal Exposition. So he decided to organize his own show called The Pavilion of Realism which was a temporary structure that he erected opposite to the Exposition Universe of 1855. In short, he challenged the rigid categories of the Academy not only in a series of his paintings but also in his actual life.
      The artist disregarded authority and convention of the academy. However, the trace of the academic tradition remains still in Courbet's painting. This means he was not immune from the Salon’s view. In this paper I examine the relation between Courbet and the Paris Salon, focusing on the composition and rhetoric of The Artist’s Studio . As I demonstrate, the composition of the picture relates to the academic history painting’s central composition, especially The Sabine Women of Jacques-Louis David. The Artist's Studio was called allegory by Courbet. Allegory is the principle rhetoric of the academic history painting. In 19th-century salon’s paintings, the purpose of allegory was the personification of an abstract concept. He was interested in the allegory as an indirect or veiled mode of expression rather than the allegorical personifications. He created his own realism simultaneously using the tradition and the difference. In The Artist’s Studio, Courbet's massed figures The Contradiction of Gustave Courbet: on The Painter’s Studio, A Real Allegory Summing up a Seven-Year Phase (1855) Lee, Jaeeun(Sungshin Women's University, Lecturer) locate theirs place in the academic composition and are to be the allegorical personification. The kind of contradiction was due to the Salon’s gaze that controled the mainstream art of 19th-century Paris.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 살롱과 쿠르베
      • II. <화가의 작업실, 나의 예술적 생애의 7년에 걸친 한 시기를 정의하는 현실의 알레고리>(1855)
      • III. 아카데미 전통의 화면구성
      • IV. 살롱의 역사화의 수사학
      • V. 살롱의 역사화의 수용과 변용
      • I. 살롱과 쿠르베
      • II. <화가의 작업실, 나의 예술적 생애의 7년에 걸친 한 시기를 정의하는 현실의 알레고리>(1855)
      • III. 아카데미 전통의 화면구성
      • IV. 살롱의 역사화의 수사학
      • V. 살롱의 역사화의 수용과 변용
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 자크라캉, "욕망이론" 문예출판사 1994

      2 피에르 부르디외, "예술의 규칙: 문학 장의 기원과 구조" 동문선 1992

      3 김욱동, "수사학이란 무엇인가" 민음사 2002

      4 김연순, "독문학용어사전" 탐구당 1991

      5 미셸 푸코, "감시와 처벌" 나남출판사 2003

      6 Bryson, Norman, "Tradition & Desire: From David to Delacroix" Cambridge 1984

      7 Chu, Petra ten-Doesschate, "The Most Arrogant Man in France" Princeton University Press 2007

      8 Fried, Michael, "Painer into Painting: On Courbet’s‘ After Dinner at Ornans’ and ‘Stonebreakers ’" 8 (8): 1982

      9 Chu, Petra ten-Doesschate, "Letters of Gustave Courbet" The University of Chicago Press 1992

      10 Brookner, Anita, "Jacques-Louis David" Thames and Hudson 1987

      1 자크라캉, "욕망이론" 문예출판사 1994

      2 피에르 부르디외, "예술의 규칙: 문학 장의 기원과 구조" 동문선 1992

      3 김욱동, "수사학이란 무엇인가" 민음사 2002

      4 김연순, "독문학용어사전" 탐구당 1991

      5 미셸 푸코, "감시와 처벌" 나남출판사 2003

      6 Bryson, Norman, "Tradition & Desire: From David to Delacroix" Cambridge 1984

      7 Chu, Petra ten-Doesschate, "The Most Arrogant Man in France" Princeton University Press 2007

      8 Fried, Michael, "Painer into Painting: On Courbet’s‘ After Dinner at Ornans’ and ‘Stonebreakers ’" 8 (8): 1982

      9 Chu, Petra ten-Doesschate, "Letters of Gustave Courbet" The University of Chicago Press 1992

      10 Brookner, Anita, "Jacques-Louis David" Thames and Hudson 1987

      11 Nochlin, Linda, "Gustave Courbet’s Meeting : A Portait of the Artist as a Wandering Jew" 49 (49): 1967

      12 Faunce, Sarah, "Courbet Reconsidered (exhibition catalogue)" rooklyn Museum 1998

      13 Men, Ségolène Le., "Courbet" Abbeville Press Publishers 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-03-27 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association of Art Theories -> The Korean Society of Art Theories KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.32 0.896 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼