RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Satiric Burlesque on Humanist Education in The Two Gentlemen of Verona.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103994697

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Jang Hyun NamShakespeare's play, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, has often been regarded as one of his weakest efforts. It has been criticised by many readers and often branded as a strange combination of the 'ludicrous' and 'careless'. However, a closer examination of the text reveals that this may have been a deliberate attempt by Shakespeare who, by balancing the ludicrous and the serious, sought to give his drama an educative function. Shakespeare's educational method is closely related to the ideal teaching methods of humanists, who advocated 'teaching through amusement.' This aspect can be regarded as more appropriate when one of the themes Shakespeare treats in The Two Gentlemen of Verona is the humanist education of gentlemen in Elizabethan England. The reality of education and the development of 'gentlemen' are parodied at a number of levels, while comic elements remain undamaged. Examining the goals and relationships of the principal characters in the context of humanist education serves to demonstrate that the play is not just a bizzare mixture of seriousness and ludicrousness but in fact a well-planned drama. Through the use of satire and parody, Shakespeare was able to connect with the audience to both entertain them, and educate them with regard to the reality of the education of gentlemen in his day. It is also a very effective way to demonstrate the difference between the ideal and the real images of perfect gentlemen as represented by Proteus and Valentine in their own separate ways.
      번역하기

      Jang Hyun NamShakespeare's play, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, has often been regarded as one of his weakest efforts. It has been criticised by many readers and often branded as a strange combination of the 'ludicrous' and 'careless'. However, a closer...

      Jang Hyun NamShakespeare's play, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, has often been regarded as one of his weakest efforts. It has been criticised by many readers and often branded as a strange combination of the 'ludicrous' and 'careless'. However, a closer examination of the text reveals that this may have been a deliberate attempt by Shakespeare who, by balancing the ludicrous and the serious, sought to give his drama an educative function. Shakespeare's educational method is closely related to the ideal teaching methods of humanists, who advocated 'teaching through amusement.' This aspect can be regarded as more appropriate when one of the themes Shakespeare treats in The Two Gentlemen of Verona is the humanist education of gentlemen in Elizabethan England. The reality of education and the development of 'gentlemen' are parodied at a number of levels, while comic elements remain undamaged. Examining the goals and relationships of the principal characters in the context of humanist education serves to demonstrate that the play is not just a bizzare mixture of seriousness and ludicrousness but in fact a well-planned drama. Through the use of satire and parody, Shakespeare was able to connect with the audience to both entertain them, and educate them with regard to the reality of the education of gentlemen in his day. It is also a very effective way to demonstrate the difference between the ideal and the real images of perfect gentlemen as represented by Proteus and Valentine in their own separate ways.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Wyatt to Cowley" 1985

      2 "University of Texas Press" 1960

      3 "The Whole Works of Roger Ascham" 1864

      4 "The Two Gentlemen of Verona as Burlesque" 210-19, 1982

      5 "The Two Gentlemen of Verona" 1969

      6 "The Merchant of Venice" Norton 1997

      7 "The Doctrine of the English Gentleman in the Sixteenth Century" Peter Smith 1964

      8 "The Correspondence of Sir Philip Sidney and Hubert Languet" 1845

      9 "The Chorus of History Literary-historical relations in Renaissance Britain" Branford Press 1971

      10 "Studies in Education during the Age of the Renaissance 1400-1600" Teacher College Press 1967

      1 "Wyatt to Cowley" 1985

      2 "University of Texas Press" 1960

      3 "The Whole Works of Roger Ascham" 1864

      4 "The Two Gentlemen of Verona as Burlesque" 210-19, 1982

      5 "The Two Gentlemen of Verona" 1969

      6 "The Merchant of Venice" Norton 1997

      7 "The Doctrine of the English Gentleman in the Sixteenth Century" Peter Smith 1964

      8 "The Correspondence of Sir Philip Sidney and Hubert Languet" 1845

      9 "The Chorus of History Literary-historical relations in Renaissance Britain" Branford Press 1971

      10 "Studies in Education during the Age of the Renaissance 1400-1600" Teacher College Press 1967

      11 "Sir Thomas Elyot and the Integrity of The Two Gentlemen of Verona" 1166-65 80, 1950

      12 "Shakespeare: Early Comedies" MacMillan 1995

      13 "Journal of the History of Ideas" 214-32, 1952

      14 "Introduction of the New Cambridge Shakespeare The Two Gentlemen of Verona" 1990

      15 "Education in The Two Gentlemen of Verona Studies in English Literature" 1500 229-1900 44, 1975

      16 "Coming out in Shakespeare's The Two Gentlemen of Verona" 857-60 77, 1993

      17 "Comic Transformations in Shakespeare" Methuen 1980

      18 "A Satiric Burlesque on Humanist Education in"

      19 ".The Courtier's Art:Systematic Immorality in the Renaissance" University College of Swansea 1983

      20 ". Love's Labour's Lost" Norton 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2018 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-04-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스 영문학회 -> 한국 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-07-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스영문학회 -> 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.15 1.112 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼