본 연구는 기존의 감정의 공유(shared affect) 문헌에서 제시하는 개인간 유사한 감정의 공유 단계에서 한 단계 더 나아가, 개인간 상호작용을 통해 긍정적인 감정이 증폭, 강화되어 행...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76443009
2008
-
조직내 활력 관계 ; 감정의 공유 ; 자율성 ; 역량 ; 소속감 ; Energizing Relationships ; Shared Affect ; Autonomy ; Competence ; Belongingness
325
KCI등재
학술저널
95-128(34쪽)
20
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 기존의 감정의 공유(shared affect) 문헌에서 제시하는 개인간 유사한 감정의 공유 단계에서 한 단계 더 나아가, 개인간 상호작용을 통해 긍정적인 감정이 증폭, 강화되어 행...
본 연구는 기존의 감정의 공유(shared affect) 문헌에서 제시하는 개인간 유사한 감정의 공유 단계에서 한 단계 더 나아가, 개인간 상호작용을 통해 긍정적인 감정이 증폭, 강화되어 행동의 준비상태 및 동기부여된 상태에 도달된 관계를 ‘조직내 활력관계(energizing relationships)’ 개념(Baker, Cross & Wooten, 2003)을 이용하여 설명하였다. 본 연구는 조직내 활력 관계의 개념적 틀을 마련하고, 조직내 활력관계의 형성 과정을 세 가지 인지적 요인?자율성, 역량, 소속감에 대한 인식 ? 을 이용하여 제시하였다. 더 나아가, 세 가지 인지적 요인을 강화시킬 수 있는 관계적 속성들을 두 개인간 관계의 강도, 짐멜 관계의 존재여부, 그리고 조직내 감정규범의 존재여부의 관점에서 탐색하였다. 끝으로 조직내 활력관계에 관한 연구가 감정의 공유 연구, 동기부여 연구, 그리고 사회연결망 연구에 주는 이론적 시사점과 향후 연구방향, 그리고 조직에 주는 시사점을 논의하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Why do certain interpersonal relationships energize and inspire people involved in the relationships while some other relationships de?energize and dishearten those involved in the relationships? Building on the concept of energizing relat...
Why do certain interpersonal relationships energize and inspire people involved in the relationships while some other relationships de?energize and dishearten those involved in the relationships? Building on the concept of energizing relationships(Baker, Cross, & Wooten, 2003), we develop a conceptual framework that defines energizing relationships in organizations. We distinguish between shared positive affect and energizing relationships in the following two ways. First, shared positive affect results from unconscious emotional contagion among unspecified individuals, whereas energizing relationships arise from cognitive interpretation of shared positive affect, especially with respect to autonomy, competence, and belongingness. Second, energizing relationships develop from shared positive affect when emotional contagion occurs through individually meaningful social relationships. We then explore the mediating role of cognitive mechanisms between shared positive affect and energizing relationships and suggest the sense of autonomy, competence, and belongingness as three key cognitive mechanisms. Moreover, we further the moderating effects of individual social relationships on the interplay of shared positive affect and three cognitive mechanisms. In particular, we examine these effects by paying attention to the following three aspects of social relations: tie strength, Simmelian tie, and emotional norm. Finally, we discuss the theoretical contributions of this research to group emotion, motivation, and network literatures, as well as the future research directions and practical implications.<BR> Energizing relationships<BR> Organizational and psychological researchers have recently begun to explore emotion as a collective property of groups. They have mainly focused on how group members come to share similar emotions or moods and on the consequences of the shared emotions and moods. However, sometimes individuals may experience their emotions strengthened and amplified during interpersonal interactions above and beyond the level of sharing similar emotions with the interaction partner. For example, a team leader who is sharing a calm emotion with a team member, makes an enthusiastic comment or suggestion to the team member. When this happens, we may expect that the team member would feel excited and perhaps even more enthusiastic than the team leader, and that the member would be motivated to act in ways that fulfill the emotions of excitement and enthusiasm. As such, (a) when individuals experience their positive emotions strengthened and amplified through an individually meaningful interpersonal interaction, and (b) when they feel that they are ready to act in the direction motivated by the positive emotions experienced through the interpersonal interaction, we define this specific type of interpersonal relationship as an energizing relationship in organizations.<BR> Energizing relationships have the following important characteristics. The first is that compared with ‘shared positive affect’, energizing relationships involve shared positive emotions being strengthened and amplified through interpersonal interactions. The strengthening and amplification of originally shared positive emotions can happen either to one or to both interacting partners. Second, energizing relationships consist of individuals behaviorally activated or ready to take certain actions. Specific emotions entail specific action tendencies, and motivation to act becomes stronger as individuals experience strong and high arousal emotions (Frijda, 1986). Thus, strong positive emotions experienced through energizing relationships can facilitate motivation to act in ways that correspond to emotions and their associated action tendencies. Furthermore, energizing relationships differ from shared positive affect in the following two ways. First, shared positive affect results from unconscious emoti
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 La Guardia, J. G, "Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need-fulfillment and well-being" 79 : 367-384, 2000
2 Cross, R, "What creates energy in organizations?" 44 : 51-56, 2003
3 Deci, E. L, "The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior" 11 : 227-268, 2000
4 Krackhardt,D, "The tie that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations" 16 : 183-210, 1999
5 Granovetter,M, "The strength of weak ties" 78 : 1360-1380, 1973
6 Krackhardt,D, "The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations, Networks and Organizations" 216-239, 1992
7 Hansen,M, "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits" 44 : 82-111, 1999
8 Seo, M, "The role of affective experience in work motivation" 29 : 423-439, 2004
9 Barsade,S.G, "The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 : 644-675, 2002
10 Dutton, J. E, "The power of high quality connections, Positive Organizational Scholarship" Berrett-Koehler Publishers 263-278, 2003
1 La Guardia, J. G, "Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need-fulfillment and well-being" 79 : 367-384, 2000
2 Cross, R, "What creates energy in organizations?" 44 : 51-56, 2003
3 Deci, E. L, "The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior" 11 : 227-268, 2000
4 Krackhardt,D, "The tie that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations" 16 : 183-210, 1999
5 Granovetter,M, "The strength of weak ties" 78 : 1360-1380, 1973
6 Krackhardt,D, "The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations, Networks and Organizations" 216-239, 1992
7 Hansen,M, "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits" 44 : 82-111, 1999
8 Seo, M, "The role of affective experience in work motivation" 29 : 423-439, 2004
9 Barsade,S.G, "The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 : 644-675, 2002
10 Dutton, J. E, "The power of high quality connections, Positive Organizational Scholarship" Berrett-Koehler Publishers 263-278, 2003
11 Borgatti, S. P, "The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology" 29 : 991-1013, 2003
12 Baumeister, R. F, "The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation" 117 : 497-529, 1995
13 Barrick, M. R, "The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups" 50 : 544-557, 2007
14 Frijda,N.H, "The emotions" Cambridge University Press 1986
15 Saxton,T, "The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes" 40 : 443-461, 1997
16 Langfred,C.W, "The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams" 50 : 885-900, 2007
17 Sy, T, "The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes" 90 : 295-305, 2005
18 Bartel, C. A, "The collective construction of work group moods" 45 : 197-231, 2000
19 Seers, A, "Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment" 20 : 18-38, 1995
20 Brass, D, "Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective" 47 : 795-819, 2004
21 Zukin, S, "Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy" Cambridge University Press 1990
22 Krackhardt, D, "Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms" 24 : 279-290, 2002
23 Moran,P, "Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance" 26 : 1129-1151, 2005
24 Gump, B. B, "Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion" 72 : 305-319, 1997
25 Rook,K.S, "Social support versus companionship: Effects on life stress, loneliness, and evaluations by others" 52 : 1132-1147, 1987
26 Wasserman, S, "Social network analysis: Methods and application" Cambridge University Press 1994
27 Adler, P. S, "Social capital: Prospects for a new concept" 27 : 17-40, 2002
28 Nahpiet, J, "Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage" 23 : 242-266, 1998
29 Coleman,J.S, "Social capital in the creation of human capital" 94 : S95-S120, 1988
30 Pugh,S.D, "Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter" 44 : 1018-1027, 2001
31 Ryan, R. M, "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being" 55 : 68-78, 2000
32 Reagans,R, "Preferences, identity, and competition:�Predicting tie strength from demographic data" 51 : 1374-1383, 2005
33 Baker, W, "Positive organizational network analysis and energizing relationships" Berrett-Koehler Publishers 328-842, 2003
34 Cohen, S, "Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress" 13 : 99-125, 1983
35 George,J.M, "Personality, affect, and behavior in groups" 75 : 107-116, 1990
36 Ibarra,H, "Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework" 18 : 56-88, 1993
37 Grolnick, W. S, "Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school" 2 : 143-154, 1989
38 Powell,W, "On the nature of institutional embeddedness: Labels vs explanation" 13 : 293-300, 1996
39 Collins,R, "On the micro-foundations of macro-sociology" 86 : 984-1014, 1981
40 Ryan, R. M, "On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being" 65 : 529-566, 1997
41 Granovetter,M, "Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action" Harvard Business School Press 25-56, 1992
42 Lawler, E, "Network structure and emotion in exchange relations" 63 : 871-894, 1998
43 Marks,S.R., "Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time, and commitment" 42 : 921-936, 1977
44 Kelly, J. R, "Mood and emotions in small group and work teams" 86 : 99-130, 2001
45 Marsden, P, "Measuring tie strength" 63 : 482-501, 1984
46 Baard, P, "Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivation basis of performance and well-being in two work settings" 34 : 2045-2068, 2004
47 Baum, J. A. C, "Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations" 57 : 540-559, 1992
48 Meyer, B, "Happiness and despair on the catwalk: Need satisfaction, well-being, and personality adjustment among fashion models" 2 : 2-17, 2007
49 Ryan, R. M, "From ego-depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self" Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2008
50 Izard,C.E, "Four systems for emotion activation: Cognitive and noncognitive processes" 100 : 68-90, 1993
51 Christophe, V, "Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing" 27 : 37-54, 1997
52 Totterdell, P, "Evidence of mood linkage in work groups" 74 : 1504-1515, 1998
53 Quinn, R. W, "Energizing others in work connections, Exploring positive relationships at work" Lawrence Earlbaum 73-90, 2007
54 Parkinson,B, "Emotions are social" 87 : 663-683, 1996
55 Anderson, C, "Emotional convergence between people over time" 84 : 1054-1068, 2003
56 Schoenewolf,G, "Emotional contagion: Behavioral induction in individuals and groups" 15 : 49-61, 1990
57 Tesser,A, "Emotion in social comparison and reflection processes, Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research" Erlbaum 117-148, 1991
58 Hess, U, "Emotion expression in groups, Handbook of emotions (2nd Ed)" Guilford Press 368-381, 2000
59 Frijda,N.H, "Emotion experience" 19 : 473-497, 2005
60 Lazarus,R.S, "Emotion and adaptation" Oxford University Press 1991
61 Granovetter,M, "Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness" 91 : 481-510, 1985
62 Watson, D, "Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales" 54 : 1063-1070, 1988
63 Reis, H. T, "Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness" 26 : 419-435, 2000
64 Quinn, R. W, "Coordination as energy-in-conversation" 30 : 36-57, 2005
65 Totterdell,P, "Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams" 85 : 848-859, 2000
66 Klein, S. S, "An integrative review of material possession attachment" 1 : 1-39, 2004
67 Martin, J, "An alternative to bureaucratic impersonality and emotional labor: Bounded emotionality at the Body Shop" 43 : 429-469, 1998
68 Lawler,E, "An affect theory of social exchange" 107 : 321-52, 2001
69 Totterdell, P, "Affect networks: A structural analysis of the relationship between work ties and job-related affect" 89 : 854-867, 2004
개인-환경(조직, 상사, 동료) 적합성이 조직시민행동 및 개인성과에 미치는 영향과 공정성의 매개효과 검증
기존 니치의 정당성과 신규 니치 탐색 - 정당성 관점에서 본 한국 시스템통합 기업의 니치변화 전략, 2000~2005
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2013-02-27 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 | ![]() |
| 2013-02-26 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-12-29 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-07-04 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.59 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.64 | 1.69 | 2.995 | 0.48 |