한미자유무역협정과 토지공법 = Korea-U.S FTA and the Public Land Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

On April 2th 2007, the Korean government signed Free Trade Agreement(FTA) with the U.S. The Korea-the U.S Free Trade Agreement will be move to forward on the trade liberalization and expand to investment ties and new econmic opportunities for people in both countries. Article 11.6 of the Agreement including the indirect expropriation. The indirect expropriation can be trace back to the regulatory takings at Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon(1922). This Article ist Problem on the Korean Constitution Law and Public Land Law. The constitution is the basic law which prescribes matters concerning rights and duties of citizens and the structure of government. Korean constitution is guaranteed the right to property in Article 23. The regulatory goal to “guarantee of the right to property through harmony among public
welfare” in the same article reflects the strong prevalence of traditional Korean values and the close relationship between property rights and conform to the public welfare. In its the expansion of a stable social security and welfare in development to a mature democracy and market economy. It is needed a careful analysis to indireckt expropriation under Korean Public Land Law.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

On April 2th 2007, the Korean government signed Free Trade Agreement(FTA) with the U.S. The Korea-the U.S Free Trade Agreement will be move to forward on the trade liberalization and expand to investment ties and new econmic opportunities for people in both countries. Article 11.6 of the Agreement including the indirect expropriation. The indirect expropriation can be trace back to the regulatory takings at Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon(1922). This Article ist Problem on the Korean Constitution Law and Public Land Law. The constitution is the basic law which prescribes matters concerning rights and duties of citizens and the structure of government. Korean constitution is guaranteed the right to property in Article 23. The regulatory goal to “guarantee of the right to property through harmony among public
welfare” in the same article reflects the strong prevalence of traditional Korean values and the close relationship between property rights and conform to the public welfare. In its the expansion of a stable social security and welfare in development to a mature democracy and market economy. It is needed a careful analysis to indireckt expropriation under Korean Public Land Law.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2007

2 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2007

3 김선택, "헌법상 외교권한 배분과 구체화 입법의 헌법적 한계 -조약체결에 있어서 의회 관여권을 중심으로" 한국헌법학회 2000

4 조소영, "한미 FTA에 대한 憲法的 爭點의 檢討" 한국비교공법학회 8 (8): 3-20, 2007

5 정하명, "한미 FTA 협정문 제11.6조 수용 및 보상의 의미와 정부규제권" 한국비교공법학회 8 (8): 41-62, 2007

6 전창환, "한미 FTA 협상 결정의 배경과 그 파장" 한국사회과학연구소 (67) : 5-5, 2006

7 조명래, "한-미 FTA와 한국사회의 전환" (가을) : 2006

8 류해웅, "토지공법론" 삼영사 2004

9 성소미, "최근 부동산법제의 체계와 입법동향, 국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법체계의 신전개" 2007

10 김춘환, "주택공개념에 대한 헌법적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 20 : 2003

11 박평준, "종합토지세의 입법적 고찰(토지공법연구총서 II)" 5 : 2001

12 박 훈, "종합부동산세법안의 내용과 문제점" 한국토지공법학회 20 : 2005

13 鄭夏明, "임시적 수용" 한국토지공법학회 18 : 24-552, 2003

14 신봉기, "신정부에서 토지정책 검토(토지공법연구총서 Ⅱ)" 한국토지공법학회 6 : 2001

15 석종현, "손실보상법" 삼영사 2005

16 서원우, "부동산공법" 삼영사 1991

17 오동석, "민주주의 관점에서 본 한미 FTA협상 과정의 문제점" 민주주의법학연구회 (32) : 155-186, 2006

18 성선제, "미국헌법상의 규제적 수용" 한국토지공법학회 17 : 2003

19 김민호, "미국의 규제적 수용에 있어 공익과 사익의 조정" 한국토지공법학회 16 (16): 2002

20 김문현, "미국연방헌법상 공용수용과 경찰권에 의한 규제의 구별기준" 미국헌법학회 (11) : 2000

21 이종근, "미국 헌법상의 규제적 수용의 법리" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 295-318, 2007

22 정연주, "미국 헌법상 재산권수용의 법리- 수용의 허용조건과 관련한 연방대법원 판례를 중심으로" 미국헌법학회 16 (16): 77-100, 2005

23 김동건, "공용제한의 법리와 손실보상" 한국비교공법학회 7 (7): 77-106, 2006

24 정지승, "경제법과 헌법, 경제법의 제문제" 법원도서관 2000

25 김남욱, "개발부담금제도에 관한 고찰(토지공법연구총서 IV)" 한국토지공법학회 10 : 2001

26 "Weyreuther, Die Situationsgebundenheit des Grundeigentums"

27 U. S. Senente Foreign Relations Committee, "Treaties and international agreements: The role of the United States Senente, Committee Print" Library of Congress 106-171, 2001

28 "Rudolph, Die Bindung des Eigentums"

29 "Rittstieg, in : Kommentar zum Grundgesetz f? die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bd. I, zu Art. 14"

30 "Ramsauer, ?er den Unterscheid von Inhaltsbestimmung und Schrankenbestimmung des Eigentums, DVBI."

31 "Kutschera, Bestandschutz im ?fentlichen Recht"

32 "Krohn/L?isch, Eigentumsgarantie, Enteignung, Entsch?igung, 3. Aufl."

33 "Knoll, Eingriffe in das Eigentum im Zuge der Umgestaltung gesellschaftlicher Verh?tnisse, A? 79, 1953/54"

34 "Kimminich, in : Kommentar zum Bonner Grundgesetz, , zu Art. 14"

35 "Kempen, Der Eingriff des Staates in das Eigentum"

36 N廻gens, "Eigentum, Sozialbindung" Enteignung 1987

37 "Breuer, Die Bodennutzung im Konflikt zwischen St?tebau und Eigentumsgarantie"

38 김남철, "8.31 부동산 대책에 대한 공법적 검토" 한국공법학회 34 (34): 2006