유표성 일반화와 한국어 관계절 습득의 관련성에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although Keenan Comrie(1977)'s NPAH hypothesis is widely believed to predict the difficulty order of relative clauses(RCs) in SLA, most studies have been conducted on English(& European languages). So this study tests the NPAH's applicability to Korean language acquisition. The analysis of Chinese learners's speech corpus data(Study 1) and sentence combination production test(SCT: Study 2) results revealed that (a) learners used subject(SU) RCs more easier than direct object(DO) or oblique(OBL), (b) learners made strong association between SU and animate head nouns, DO/OBL and inanimate heads in speech corpus, but this tendency was not found on SCT(except SU). This study also dealt with (c) the different effects of formal instruction(PI & MOI), and (d) learners' ability to generalize their relativization knowledge to different types of RCs. Results of SCT revealed that (1) two types of instruction positively affected the rate of acquisition of RCs(PI=MOI). And (2) learners could generalize their relativization knowledge(DO) to another types(SU, OBL) equally.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가기
• 2. NPAH 기반 관계절 습득 연구
• 2.1. NPAH와 습득 난이에 관한 연구
• 2.2. NAPH와 교수 효과에 관한 연구
• 2.3. 방법상의 고려 사항 : 유생성
• 2.4. 연구 문제
• 3. 연구 과제 1: 학습자 말뭉치 분석
• 3.1. 분류 기준 및 코딩 계획
• 3.2. 말뭉치 분석 결과
• 4. 연구 과제 2 : 실험 연구
• 4.1. 실험 대상 및 방법
• 4.2. 연구의 결과
• 5. 논의 및 나가기
• 참고문헌
• 논문초록

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이홍식, "현대국어 관형절 연구" 서울대학교 1990

2 김상수, "한국어 학습자 발화의 유창성 연구" 부산대학교 2009

3 권재일, "한국어 통사론" 민음사 286-321, 1992

4 남기심, "표준국어문법론(개정판)" 탑출판사 375-389, 1995

5 고영근, "우리말 문법론" 집문당 502-504, 2008

6 Song,J.J, "언어유형론: 형태론과 통사론" 보고사 2001

7 최인철, "명사구 접근성 위계와 영어 관계절 습득의 관련성 연구" 현대문법학회 57 (57): 267-292, 2009

8 서정수, "국어문법" 뿌리 깊은 나무 1258-1286, 1994

9 김창구, "구조적 복잡성에 따른 한국어 관계절 습득 순서 연구" 183-195, 2009

10 Hansen-Strain, L, "Variation in the relative clause of Japanese learners" 11 : 211-237, 1989

11 Hyltenstam,K, "The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition; The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses, In Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective" Newbury House Publishers 39-60, 1984

12 Ellis,R, "The study of second language acquisition" Oxford University Press 1994

13 Mellow,D, "The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses" 27 : 620-644, 2006

14 MacWhinney, B, "The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing" Cambridge 1989

15 Jun,J.S, "The agent-first strategy and the development of languages: cases of learning two languages simultaneously in Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics Ⅸ" 46-55, 2001

16 Cho,S.K, "The acquisition of relative clauses: Experimental studies on Korean" University of Hawaii 1999

17 Kim,Y.J, "The acquisition of relative clauses in English and Korean: Development in spontaneous production" Harvard University. 1987

18 Mitchell, J .G, "The acquisition of relative clause structures in French as a second language" Cornell University 2001

19 Sadighi, F, "The acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by Chinese, Japanese, and Korean adult native speakers" 32 : 141-153, 1994

20 Schumann,J.H, "The acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In Research in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Papers of the Los Angeles Second Language Acquisition Research Forum" Newbury House 118-131, 1980

21 조미정, "The Structure of Relative Clauses in Korean" 한국생성문법학회 12 (12): 107-138, 2002

22 Ammar, A, "Teaching marked linguistic structures-More about the acquisition of relative clauses by Arab learners of English. In Investigations in instructed second language learning" Mouton de Gruyter 167-198, 2004

23 Yabuki-Soh, N, "Teaching Japanese Relative Clauses" 29 : 219-252, 2007

24 Croteau,K.C, "Second language acquisition of relative clause structures by learners of Italian, In Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 115-128, 1995

25 Doughty,C.J, "Second Language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization" 13 : 431-469, 1991

26 Jeon, K. S, "Relativization in Korean as a Foreign Language" 29 : 253-276, 2007

27 Rosenbaum,H, "Relative clauses structures in informal conversation. In Studies presented to Emmon Bach by his students" University of Massachusettts 165-173, 1979

28 Yip, V, "Relative Clauses in Bilingual Children" 29 : 277-300, 2007

29 Sun-Young Lee, "Relative Clauses and Subject-drop in KSL Learners' Writing: Sentence Processing Approach" 언어교육원 41 (41): 405-436, 2005

30 이귀옥, "Quantitative Differences in the Processing of Relative Clauses between Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers" 담화·인지언어학회 11 (11): 215-236, 2004

31 Tarone, E, "On the variability of interlanguage system" 4 : 152-163, 1983

32 Diessel,H, "On the role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of subject and non-subject relative clauses. In Syntactic Complexity" John Benjamins 251-276, 2009

33 Eckman, F. R, "On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language" 9 : 1-20, 1988

34 Lee,K.O, "On the first language acquisition of relative clauses in Korean: The universal structure of COMP" Cornell University 1991

35 Keenan, E, "Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar" 8 : 63-99, 1977

36 Sakamoto, T, "Nihongo no kankeisetu no syuutoku ni tuite" 1 : 114-126, 2000

37 Pavesi, M, "Markedness, discoursal models, and relative clause formation in a formal and informal context" 8 : 38-55, 1986

38 Zobl, H, "Markedness and the projection problem" 33 : 293-313, 1983

39 Gass, S, "Language transfer and universal grammatical relations" 29 : 327-344, 1979

40 Pienemann,M, "Language Processing and Second-Language Development: Processability Theory" John Benjamins 229-264, 1998

41 Hamilton, R. L, "Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language" 44 : 123-157, 1994

42 Tarallo, F, "Interference and natural language in second language acquisition" 33 : 55-76, 1983

43 Jeon,K.S, "Interaction-driven learning: Characterizing linguistic development" Georgetown University 2004

44 VanPatten,B, "Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research" Ablex 1996

45 Roberts, M, "Implicational markedness and the acquisition of relativization by adult learners of Japanese as a foreign language" University of Hawaii 2000

46 Eckman,F.R, "Hypothesis and Methods in Second Language Acquisition: Testing the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy on Relative Clauses" 29 : 321-327, 2007

47 Zobl,H, "Grammars in search of input and intake. In Input in second language acquisition" Newbury House 329-344, 1985

48 Wajnryb,R, "Grammar dictation" Oxford University Press 1990

49 Gass,S, "From theory to practice. In" TESOL 129-139, 1982

50 Kanno, K, "Factors Affecting RC Processing" 29 : 197-218, 2007

51 Ozeki, H, "Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses?" 29 : 169-196, 2007

52 Ozeki,H, "Daiichi․daini gengo Nihongo meishi syushokusetsu syutoku katei" Kurosio 2008

53 Shin, K. S, "Characteristics of the relative clause in Korean and the problems second language learners experience in acquiring the relative clause" Curtin University of Technology 2003

54 O'Grady, W, "A subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language" 25 : 433-448, 2003