RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    취득의 개념 정립에 따른 당사자별 신탁재산의 취득세 쟁점에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Acquisition Tax Issues of Trust Property by Party in Establishing the Concept of Acquisition

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108193099

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, starting with how to define the concept of acquisition, discussions are conducted for a more reasonable and harmonious interpretation of tax laws through legal relations and consistency of trusts. In trust property, the acquisition tax issue for real estate registration and trust register change in the process of establishing, changing, and terminating a trust must start with clearly establishing the concept of acquisition and complete the judicial legal relationship on the trust to enable harmonious and reasonable tax interpretation.
    When the ownership transfer registration is completed in front of the trustee due to the trust, the trust property is legally owned by the trustee, but in economic and practical terms, the trust property is actually owned by the beneficiary. In other words, the owner of the trust property under the tax law may vary depending on the perspective of the legal relationship under the tax law on trust.
    An interpretation theory is a question of whether or not the acquisition tax is levied solely on economic effects on the change of the trust register regarding the transfer registration of trust real estate or the change of trust parties, or whether the creation of the law is necessary to obtain the effect of acquisition tax beyond judicial legal relations.
    This study examines the establishment of the concept of acquisition and the legal relationship of trusts, and here, it defines the legal principles and characteristics of trust acquisition tax regulations under the Local Tax Act. Based on this, the issues of acquisition tax taxation on trustees, consignors, and beneficiaries who are parties to the trust are examined, and problems and improvement measures are presented.
    번역하기

    In this study, starting with how to define the concept of acquisition, discussions are conducted for a more reasonable and harmonious interpretation of tax laws through legal relations and consistency of trusts. In trust property, the acquisition tax ...

    In this study, starting with how to define the concept of acquisition, discussions are conducted for a more reasonable and harmonious interpretation of tax laws through legal relations and consistency of trusts. In trust property, the acquisition tax issue for real estate registration and trust register change in the process of establishing, changing, and terminating a trust must start with clearly establishing the concept of acquisition and complete the judicial legal relationship on the trust to enable harmonious and reasonable tax interpretation.
    When the ownership transfer registration is completed in front of the trustee due to the trust, the trust property is legally owned by the trustee, but in economic and practical terms, the trust property is actually owned by the beneficiary. In other words, the owner of the trust property under the tax law may vary depending on the perspective of the legal relationship under the tax law on trust.
    An interpretation theory is a question of whether or not the acquisition tax is levied solely on economic effects on the change of the trust register regarding the transfer registration of trust real estate or the change of trust parties, or whether the creation of the law is necessary to obtain the effect of acquisition tax beyond judicial legal relations.
    This study examines the establishment of the concept of acquisition and the legal relationship of trusts, and here, it defines the legal principles and characteristics of trust acquisition tax regulations under the Local Tax Act. Based on this, the issues of acquisition tax taxation on trustees, consignors, and beneficiaries who are parties to the trust are examined, and problems and improvement measures are presented.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 홍완식, "한국 법제에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 (20) : 265-303, 2011

    2 광장신탁법연구회, "주석 신탁법" 박영사 2017

    3 이계정, "신탁의 기본 법리에 관한 연구" 경인문화사 2017

    4 법무부, "신탁법 해설" 2012

    5 이연갑, "신탁등기의 대항력 ― 대법원 2018. 9. 28. 선고 2017다273984 판결에 대한 평석 ―" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 27 (27): 141-163, 2019

    6 전동흔, "신탁과 지방세" ㈜영화조세통람 2018

    7 "법제처 국가법령정보"

    8 김종원, "민사신탁의 활용과 세무" ㈜영화조세통람 2018

    9 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2014

    10 "국세법령정보"

    1 홍완식, "한국 법제에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 (20) : 265-303, 2011

    2 광장신탁법연구회, "주석 신탁법" 박영사 2017

    3 이계정, "신탁의 기본 법리에 관한 연구" 경인문화사 2017

    4 법무부, "신탁법 해설" 2012

    5 이연갑, "신탁등기의 대항력 ― 대법원 2018. 9. 28. 선고 2017다273984 판결에 대한 평석 ―" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 27 (27): 141-163, 2019

    6 전동흔, "신탁과 지방세" ㈜영화조세통람 2018

    7 "법제처 국가법령정보"

    8 김종원, "민사신탁의 활용과 세무" ㈜영화조세통람 2018

    9 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2014

    10 "국세법령정보"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.98 0.98 1.03
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.37 1.48 1.713 0.03
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼