야간경관조명의 조명방식에 따른 평가특성분석 = Characteristics of the Evaluation on Type of Lighting of the Exterior Lighting

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the activities of recent modern people expand to night and the demand on the security, pleasantness, and beauty of a city life at night appear, the consideration about not only day but also night is required. Therefore, as the demand on exterior lighting is increased, there are many researches in the exterior lighting domestically. But, the study based on mentality of a man is lacking. So, the purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics through the evaluation of sensibility according to the type of lighting one of important factors of the exterior lighting based on a building, and present one representative image based on the type of the exterior lighting. For this, this study analyzed the character of the evaluation of sensibility according to the type of lighting of the exterior lighting about a building using a picture and CG(computer graphic) as the evaluation tool of the exterior lighting.
The process of the study is divided to 5 steps at large.
In the first step, after collecting the examples of the exterior lighting for the evaluation of sensibility according to the type of lighting of the exterior lighting, the vocabulary of the evaluation is selected through the survey and the thesis. Also, through the analysis of examples, I arranged and analyzed the type of lighting.
In the second step, the validity of the evaluation tool of the exterior lighting with the vocabulary selected in the first step is verified.
The third step, with the experiment of the evaluation of the type of the lighting of the exterior lighting, the vocabulary of the evaluation selected in the first step and the basis of the validity of the verified evaluation tool in the second step, carried out the experiment with the picture and the CG.
The fourth step analyzed the relation between the selected representative image and the type of lighting of the exterior lighting about a building quantitatively after analyzing the factors of the result of the experiment of each evaluation.
The fifth step presented the representative image according to the type of lighting of the exterior lighting.
1. Verification of validity of the evaluation tool of the exterior lighting
In the verification of the physic amount implemented prior to sensibility of the evaluation, the rate of total average relative error was 3.76, and the rate of average relative error of each ramp was within 5%. So, the real test and the verification of physic amount of luminance of the simulation test by CG can be valid. The validity of the result of the evaluation of sensibility of simulation using the real test and the CG showed little difference of regard except the item of 「natural」, 「changable」, 「funny」. The validity of the result of the real test and the evaluation of sensibility of pictures told us nothing to regard except the item of 「natural」, 「cozy」, and 「funny」.
2. Analysis on the character of the evaluation according to the type of lighting of the exterior lighting
1) When the exterior lighting is evaluated, I analysed the factors in order to make sure the construction of mentality. As the result of that, the test of the picture was divided to 4 factors, and the test of the CG is split to 3 factors. But there were only changes of the item of evaluation of 4 factors divided to extra factors of the picture test, and the I of an activity axis as a main factor's axis, the Ⅱ of an evaluation axis, and the Ⅲ of a warmth axis are similar and explainable to both the picture and the CG identically. As the result of the analysis of the factor of the CG test, the first factor consists of the item of evaluation such as 「funny」, 「dynamic」, 「gay」, 「changable」, 「active」, 「intense」, 「clear」, 「characteristic」, 「bright」, 「modern」 and 「rising」 and those are called as the factor [funny · dynamic]. The second factor consists of the item of evaluation such as 「natural」, 「stable」, and 「comfortable」, and those are called as the factor [natural · stable]. The item of evaluation like 「grand」 put aside since it is involved in both the first and second factors. The third factor consists of the item of evaluation such as 「mysterious」 and 「warm」 and those are called as the factor of [mysterious · warm].
2) The result of the distribution chart of factor scores in order to analyze the character quantitatively through evaluation by the test, the image of [dynamic · gay] shows the high relative relation of the type of lighting between the linear lighting and the transmitted light in the test of a picture, but in CG test, point lighting and linear lighting have high relative relation. And, down lighting and up lighting have low relative relation. The mixture lighting using the type of lighting more than two things has high relative relation. The image of 「stable」 and 「natural」 has high relative relation with the up lighting and the type of transmitted light in the test of a picture, but in CG test, up lighting, down lighting, and transmitted light have high relative relation. And in the case of partly evaluated low on the up lighting and down lighting, the lighting is caused by being set up on the highest part. And the image of 「stable」 and 「natural」 is judged as influenced on the position lighted. The case of the mixture lighting using more than two things, involving point lighting and linear lighting had low evaluation, but the case of the type of transmitted light, up light, and down light intended to show high evaluation. The image of [mysterious · warm] like the test of a picture influenced more than the type of lighting. The warmer color of light is, the higher relative relation is to the item of most warm color, and as much as the color of light is close to cold type and G type, it has high relative relation with the item of 「mysterious」.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 1.2 연구의 방법 = 2
• 제2장 이론적 고찰 = 5
• 2.1 야간경관조명의 조명방식 = 5
• 2.2 광원 = 6
• 2.3 Lightscape 프로그램의 개요 = 8
• 제3장 평가어휘 선정 및 조명방법의 분류 = 12
• 3.1 어휘의 선정 = 12
• 3.2 건축물의 야간경관조명의 조명방식에 대한 분류 = 13
• 제4장 야간경관조명 평가도구의 유효성 검증 = 16
• 4.1 실험의 목적 = 16
• 4.2 실험의 개요 = 16
• 4.2.1 평가대상 건물의 개요 및 특성 = 17
• 4.2.2 실물 실험장치 = 18
• 4.2.3 사진과 CG의 제작 = 19
• 4.2.4 피험자 = 20
• 4.3 물리량의 측정 및 감성평가실험 = 21
• 4.3.1 실험의 방법 = 21
• 4.4 실험 결과 및 분석 = 22
• 4.4.1 물리량의 검증 결과 = 22
• 4.4.2 감성평가 결과 = 25
• 4.4.3 야간경관조명 평가도구의 유효성 검증 = 27
• 4.5 소결 = 29
• 제5장 야간경관조명의 조명방식에 따른 평가특성분석Ⅰ = 31
• 5.1 실험의 목적 = 31
• 5.2 실험의 개요 = 31
• 5.2.1 피험자의 구성 = 31
• 5.2.2 평가변인 및 평가대상 = 32
• 5.3 평가실험 = 35
• 5.3.1 실험의 방법 = 35
• 5.3.2 평가항목 = 35
• 5.4 실험결과 및 분석 = 35
• 5.4.1 분석방법 = 35
• 5.4.2 인자구조분석 = 36
• 5.4.3 대표 이미지 유형 설정 = 38
• 5.4.4 대표 이미지 유형별 평가변인의 영향분석 = 38
• 5.5 소결 = 43
• 제6장 야간경관조명의 조명방식에 따른 평가특성분석 Ⅱ = 45
• 6.1 실험의 목적 = 45
• 6.2 실험의 개요 = 45
• 6.2.1 피험자의 구성 = 45
• 6.2.2 평가변인 및 평가대상 = 46
• 6.3 평가실험 = 55
• 6.3.1 실험의 방법 = 55
• 6.4 실험결과 및 분석 = 55
• 6.4.1 분석방법 = 55
• 6.4.2 인자구조 분석 = 55
• 6.4.3 대표 이미지 유형 설정 = 57
• 6.4.4 대표 이미지 유형별 평가변인의 영향분석 = 57
• 6.5 소결 = 64
• 제7장 결론 = 66
• 참고문헌 = 69